Answer One Of The Following Questions Below In A Minimum Of

Answer One Of The Following Questions Below In a Minimum Of 300 Words

Answer one of the following questions below in a minimum of 300 words in apa format with at least two references and cite them as well. United States references only 1. What was the relationship between America’s economic interests abroad and the expansionist impulse of the late nineteenth century? 2. Why should a rebellion in Cuba – an internal affair of Spain’s – become a cause for war with the United States? 3. What were the causes of World War I? What made it a “world†war? 4. What was President Wilson’s vision of the postwar word, and how did he specifically propose to achieve it? How did European leaders react to Wilson’s ideas? Why did the U.S. Senate refuse to ratify the peace treaty?

Paper For Above instruction

The late nineteenth century marked a pivotal period in American history, characterized by a surge of expansionist ambitions driven by economic interests and nationalistic fervor. The relationship between America’s economic pursuits abroad and its expansionist impulse was intrinsically linked, as economic motives largely influenced foreign policy decisions during this era. This essay examines the interplay between economic motivations and expansionism in the United States during the late 1800s, exploring how economic interests propelled American imperialism and shaped foreign relations.

During the late nineteenth century, the United States experienced rapid industrialization and economic growth, which created a need for new markets and raw materials. American businesses sought to expand their influence beyond domestic borders to access these resources and markets, fueling an expansionist impulse. This drive was evident in initiatives such as the annexation of Hawaii, the acquisition of the Philippines, Guam, and Puerto Rico following the Spanish-American War, and efforts to open trade with China through spheres of influence (Holt, 2012). These pursuits aligned with the broader concept of Manifest Destiny, but on a global scale, advocating for American dominance in hemispheric and international affairs.

The economic interests of American corporations and financiers played a crucial role in shaping foreign policy. For instance, the influence of anti-Imperialist sentiments intertwined with economic motives, highlighting the desire to secure resources, secure investments, and access strategic locations. The push for imperialism was also reinforced by the belief that control over colonies would bolster economic growth and stabilize American influence worldwide (Ninkovich, 1990). Notably, the Open Door Policy in China exemplified this intertwining of economic goals with diplomatic strategy, aiming to ensure American access to Chinese markets without colonizing the nation outright.

This expansionist impulse was also driven by competition with European powers, who had long established global empires. The United States sought to assert its economic and strategic interests to compete effectively, which in turn fueled imperialistic actions that aligned with economic motives. Therefore, American expansionism in the late nineteenth century was not merely about territorial acquisition but was motivated fundamentally by economic interests that aimed to secure markets, resources, and strategic advantages in an increasingly interconnected global economy.

References

• Holt, T. (2012). The Theory and Practice of American Imperialism. Routledge.
• Ninkovich, A. (1990). The United States and Imperialism. Blackwell Publishing.