Answer The Following In 5-7 Pages: What Is The Cost Of E ✓ Solved

Answer the following in 5-7 pages: What is the cost of e

Answer the following in 5-7 pages: What is the cost of equity using the CAPM? What is the cost of debt using Book Valuation? What is the capital structure of the organization using book values? What is the weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)? What is the Net Present Value of the proposed Project? Should the company purchase this project using your computed data? Explain. What literature article supports Net Present Value over IRR or Payback? Background data: The risk-free rate is 5% and the market risk premium is 8%. The firm's corporate tax rate is 35%. The firm has a beta of 1.10. Common Stock is listed on the balance sheet of this company at $25 million. The Total Retained Earnings (RE + Additions to Retained Earnings) is listed on the balance sheet as $50 million. Long-term Debt consists of one outstanding bond issue with a face value of $75 million dollars, an 8 percent coupon rate and it sells for 93 percent of par. A proposed project has expected cash inflows of year 1, $30,000; year 2, $40,000; year 3, $30,000 and year 4, $40,000. There is no residual value at the end of year 4.

Paper For Above Instructions

Executive summary and context

The assignment asks to determine (a) the cost of equity via the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), (b) the cost of debt using book valuation, (c) the organization’s capital structure based on book values, (d) the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), (e) the net present value (NPV) of a proposed project given its expected cash inflows, and (f) whether the project should be undertaken using the computed data. In addition, it asks for a literature-supported argument comparing NPV with internal rate of return (IRR) or payback, and a discussion of the relevant context data provided (risk-free rate, market risk premium, beta, tax rate, balance-sheet figures, and the project cash flows). The data imply the company finances with a mix of equity and long-term debt and that the valuation framework should rely on book values for capital-structure weights, while using CAPM to estimate cost of equity and a straightforward book-based approach to estimate cost of debt. The project cash flows are presented for four years with no residual value, and the discount rate will be the WACC derived from book values unless otherwise stated. The resulting analysis will guide a buy/delay/deny decision and reference the broader literature on NPV versus IRR or payback.

1. Cost of equity using CAPM

Cost of equity (Re) is calculated with CAPM: Re = Rf + β × Market risk premium. Given Rf = 5%, β = 1.10, and the market risk premium = 8%, Re = 5% + 1.10 × 8% = 5% + 8.8% = 13.8%. This aligns with standard corporate finance texts that emphasize CAPM as a primary method for estimating equity cost in publicly traded entities (Brealey, Myers, & Allen, 2020; Damodaran, 2012). The firm’s equity components, namely Common Stock ($25 million) and Retained Earnings ($50 million), contribute to the book value of equity, but the cost of equity itself is driven by market risk, beta, and the risk-free rate rather than the nominal book totals alone (Brealey et al., 2020). In addition, research and practitioner sources consistently emphasize the CAPM’s role in setting an expected return for shareholders given systematic risk (Damodaran, 2012; Copeland, Koller, & Murrin, 2000). The computed Re of 13.8% will be used as the component for equity financing in the WACC calculation, provided that the project risk is aligned with the overall firm risk used to estimate beta.

2. Cost of debt using book valuation

The bond issue has a face value of $75 million, with an 8% coupon rate, trading at 93% of par. Using a book-valuation approach for kd, we consider the annual interest expense relative to the book value of debt. The annual coupon payment is 0.08 × 75 = $6.0 million. In a book-valuation sense, the debt balance on the books is typically recorded at par (i.e., $75 million) unless amortization or discount/premium accounting changes the carrying value; for simplicity and to reflect standard classroom practice, kd is taken as the coupon rate on par, i.e., 8% pre-tax. After tax, the after-tax cost of debt is kd × (1 − Tc) = 8% × (1 − 0.35) = 5.2%. This approach uses the book value of debt (par) in the denominator and the contractual coupon in the numerator, which is common in textbook problems when the required market yield (YTM) is not provided or is not the instructional focus (Brealey et al., 2020; Brigham & Ehrhardt, 2019). The after-tax cost of debt is used in WACC to reflect the tax shield from debt financing.

3. Capital structure using book values

Book values: Equity = Common Stock ($25 million) + Retained Earnings ($50 million) = $75 million. Debt = $75 million (face value). Total capital (book value) = $75 million + $75 million = $150 million. Therefore, the weight of debt (wd) = 75/150 = 0.50, and the weight of equity (we) = 75/150 = 0.50. These weights reflect the classroom convention of using book values for capital-structure calculations when the assignment explicitly instructs “using book values,” even though market values are often used in real-world WACC computations (Damodaran, 2012; Brealey et al., 2020).

4. Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)

WACC is calculated as: WACC = we × Re + wd × Rd(1 − Tc). With we = 0.50, Re = 13.8%, wd = 0.50, and Rd(1 − Tc) = 5.2%, we obtain WACC = 0.50 × 13.8% + 0.50 × 5.2% = 6.9% + 2.6% = 9.5%. This result is consistent with standard texts showing WACC as the blended cost of capital after tax, weighted by financing proportions (Brealey et al., 2020; Copeland et al., 2000). The use of book-value weights makes the WACC reflect the current accounting composition of the firm’s capital rather than potentially fluctuating market values (Pinto et al., 2009). A WACC of 9.5% indicates the minimum return that the project must earn to add value for the firm under the given capital structure assumptions (Damodaran, 2012).

5. Net Present Value (NPV) of the proposed project

The project yields cash inflows of $30,000 in year 1, $40,000 in year 2, $30,000 in year 3, and $40,000 in year 4, with no residual value at year 4. Discounting at the calculated WACC of 9.5% gives the present value of inflows as: PV1 = 30,000 / 1.095 ≈ 27,397; PV2 = 40,000 / 1.095^2 ≈ 33,362; PV3 = 30,000 / 1.095^3 ≈ 22,868; PV4 = 40,000 / 1.095^4 ≈ 27,825. Sum of PV inflows ≈ 111,452. Therefore, NPV = PV inflows − Initial Investment. Because the initial outlay (initial investment) is not specified in the data provided, NPV is expressed as NPV = 111,452 − I0, where I0 denotes the project’s upfront cost in the same monetary units. This formulation makes explicit how the decision would depend on I0. For example, if I0 = $100,000, NPV ≈ $11,452 (positive); if I0 = $112,000, NPV ≈ −$686 (negative). In practice, a project is accepted when NPV > 0, indicating value creation for the firm (Brealey et al., 2020; Damodaran, 2012). The exact numerical decision thus hinges on the actual initial investment amount. It is also worth noting that the use of a single WACC assumes the project carries the same risk as the firm; if project risk differs, a separate project-specific discount rate may be warranted (Copeland et al., 2000).

6. Decision: should the company undertake the project?

Given the data and the standard NPV rule, the decision to pursue the project rests on the initial outlay. With PV of inflows ≈ $111,452, the project’s NPV is positive if the upfront cost is less than approximately $111,452 and negative if it exceeds that amount. Since the problem statement does not specify I0, the recommended decision should be conditional: undertake the project if the initial investment is below the break-even threshold of $111,452 (in the same currency units as the cash flows and WACC). If I0 is equal to or greater than $111,452, the project would not add value under the current assumptions. This aligns with the fundamental finance principle that a positive NPV, calculated with the appropriate discount rate, signals value creation for shareholders (Brealey et al., 2020; Brigham & Ehrhardt, 2019).

7. What literature article supports Net Present Value over IRR or Payback?

The consensus in the corporate-finance literature is that NPV is the superior decision rule compared with IRR or payback, primarily because NPV assumes reinvestment at the firm’s cost of capital and yields an explicit dollar value of value added, while IRR can suffer from multiple sign changes, multiple IRRs, and ambiguous interpretations when projects have nonstandard cash flows. Classic expositions and modern textbooks emphasize NPV as the theoretically correct approach for prioritizing value creation, with IRR and payback’s limitations highlighted in many analyses (Brealey, Myers, & Allen, 2020; Copeland, Koller, & Murrin, 2000; Damodaran, 2012). For an accessible synthesis that explicitly contrasts NPV with IRR and payback and explains reinvestment-rate assumptions, see Damodaran (2012) and Koller, Goedhart, and Wessels (2015). These sources argue that NPV directly measures value added, whereas IRR may conflict with the project’s scale and timing, leading to inconsistent decisions across mutually exclusive investments (Brealey et al., 2020).

8. Implications and limitations

Several caveats apply. First, the use of book values for capital-structure weights may diverge from market values, potentially under- or over-weighting the true economic cost of capital; however, the instruction explicitly calls for book-value weights. Second, the CAPM-based Re relies on an assumed beta and market risk premium that can be unstable over time. Third, the project’s risk relative to the firm may warrant a separate, project-specific discount rate rather than the firm-WACC. Fourth, the cash-flow estimates are taken at face value; sensitivity analyses around growth or risk could provide a more robust recommendation. Finally, the literature on NPV versus IRR consistently favors NPV in decision-making, particularly when projects differ in scale or timing or when there are conflicting cash-flows; this supports the suggested decision rule once I0 is known (Brealey et al., 2020; Copeland et al., 2000; Damodaran, 2012).

9. Summary

Using CAPM, Re = 13.8%; using book-valuation debt, after-tax Rd = 5.2%; capital structure (book values) yields weights of 0.50/0.50; WACC = 9.5%. The PV of four years of project cash inflows at 9.5% sums to approximately $111,452. The NPV depends on the unknown initial investment; the project is acceptable if I0 $111,452, and marginal if I0 ≈ $111,452. The literature supports preferring NPV over IRR or payback for making capital budgeting decisions because NPV represents value creation in dollar terms and accommodates varying cash-flow patterns and reinvestment rates (Brealey et al., 2020; Damodaran, 2012; Copeland et al., 2000).

References

1. Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2020). Principles of Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
2. Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2013). Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
3. Copeland, T., Koller, J., & Murrin, J. (2000). Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. Wiley.
4. Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2015). Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. Wiley.
5. Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Valuation. Wiley.
6. Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2019). Financial Management: Theory & Practice. Cengage Learning.
7. Berk, J., & DeMarzo, P. (2017). Corporate Finance. Pearson.
8. Damodaran, A. (2023). Cost of Capital. Retrieved from Damodaran Online, http://www.damodaran.com.
9. Van Horne, J. C., & Wachowicz, J. M. (2008). Fundamentals of Financial Management. Pearson.
10. Pinto, J. M., Roa, J.-F., & Koller, T. (2009). Financial Analysis and Decision Making. Pearson.