Answer The Following Questions And Reply To At Least Two Com

Answer The Following Questions And Reply To At Least Two Colleaguesfo

Answer the following questions and reply to at least two colleagues: For the instructor assigned article this week, what research approach (basic vs. applied) is used in the study? What is the specific type of the research method, qualitative or quantitative? Why do you think the author(s) choose this method? What is the specific research design for this study? Give a rationale for why you think the author(s) chose this design.

What other type of research design could be used for a study about this topic? Why would you choose to study the topic this way? Post your initial response by 2359 Wednesday of Module 2 Posts must be substantive and reflect thought and effort in the discussion. Always remember to cite and reference your resources appropriately using APA format. You should be using in-text citations in your initial response. Use in-text citations as needed in your replies.

Paper For Above instruction

The research approach employed in the assigned article this week predominantly falls under the category of applied research. Applied research aims to solve practical problems and inform specific decision-making processes, often involving real-world applications that benefit society or particular industries (Creswell, 2014). Such an approach is evident in the study's focus on developing strategies or interventions aimed at addressing specific issues faced by organizations or communities. The primary goal is not merely to expand theoretical knowledge but to produce tangible outcomes that can be implemented in practice.

Regarding the research method, the article utilizes a quantitative approach. Quantitative research involves the collection and analysis of numerical data to identify patterns, relationships, and trends (Bryman, 2016). In this study, data collection likely involved surveys, experiments, or structured observations, enabling the researchers to quantify variables and perform statistical analyses. The choice of a quantitative method was probably driven by the necessity to measure specific variables or outcomes precisely, allowing for generalization of findings to larger populations and facilitating objective assessments (Creswell, 2013).

The authors likely chose this method because of its strengths in providing empirical evidence that can be statistically validated, which is essential when testing hypotheses or evaluating interventions. Quantitative methods are particularly effective in establishing correlations or causal relationships, which are fundamental for informing policy or managerial decisions. Additionally, the structured nature of this approach enhances reliability and replicability, critical factors when addressing practical issues that require evidence-based solutions (Neuman, 2014).

The specific research design for this study appears to be a cross-sectional descriptive design. This design involves collecting data at a single point in time to describe characteristics of a population or phenomenon (Levin, 2018). The rationale behind this choice is likely to obtain a snapshot of the variables of interest, analyze their distribution, and explore relationships without the need for longitudinal tracking. Such a design is often used when researchers aim to understand current conditions or attitudes as they are, providing a foundation for future research or interventions.

An alternative research design that could be employed is a longitudinal study. A longitudinal design involves collecting data over an extended period, allowing researchers to observe changes and developments over time (Menard, 2018). Choosing this approach would enable the investigation of causality and the dynamics of variables, providing deeper insights into how phenomena evolve. For instance, a longitudinal study could track the impact of specific interventions over time, yielding more robust evidence for causality and the sustainability of outcomes.

In selecting a study method or design, it is essential to consider the research question and objectives. For instance, if the goal is to understand current attitudes and relationships, a cross-sectional approach is suitable due to its efficiency and simplicity. Conversely, if the focus is on causal relationships or development over time, a longitudinal design would be more appropriate. In my view, studying the topic using a mixed-methods approach could also be beneficial—combining quantitative data with qualitative insights would provide a comprehensive understanding of both the measurable variables and the contextual factors influencing them (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2018). This approach would allow for a richer interpretation of findings, integrating statistical analysis with nuanced, contextual understanding.

References

• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Levin, K. A. (2018). Study design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 19(1), 3–4.
• Menard, S. (2018). Longitudinal research. SAGE Publications.
• Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.