Anth 305 Sheila R. Tully Final Research Paper Guidelines

Anth 305 Sheila R Tullyfinal Research Paper Guidelinesdetails

You will be required to write a 6-8 page academic research paper following the specified formatting and content guidelines. The assignment involves formulating a research question related to anthropology, developing a theoretical framework, conducting a literature review, presenting specific evidence, and providing a comprehensive analysis. The paper should include an introduction with research methods and a roadmap, a clearly stated thesis, a well-organized body with contextual and comparative analysis, and a conclusion summarizing key findings and implications. Proper citation and formatting, including at least six scholarly sources, are mandatory. The paper must logically connect each component, demonstrating critical thinking and scholarly engagement. Additionally, students may choose between topics related to anthropological research or personal reflections on COVID’s impact, with an emphasis on analysis and social context. Regular consultation, draft revision, and peer review are encouraged to produce a polished final submission.

Paper For Above instruction

The final research paper for Anthropology 305 offers students an opportunity to engage deeply with a chosen anthropological question or social issue, employing rigorous research methods and critical analysis to produce a scholarly article. This assignment emphasizes the integration of theoretical perspectives, comprehensive literature review, and evidence-supported argumentation. It requires adherence to specific formatting standards—6 to 8 pages, Times New Roman font, double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, and Chicago citation style. Students must include at least six academic sources, excluding assigned readings, and ensure proper citation of all references, in-text and bibliographic.

The core of the assignment involves identifying a clear research question or thesis related to anthropology. In the context of a research-based paper, students should develop a compelling research question, such as exploring the role of identity, race, gender, memory, or ritual within a specific cultural setting. The introduction should contextualize the issue, describe research methods (e.g., ethnography, comparative analysis, qualitative or quantitative data), and outline the paper’s structure. A strong theoretical framework is vital, incorporating relevant definitions and concepts that underpin the analysis.

The literature review synthesizes existing anthropological scholarship pertinent to the research question, highlighting key themes and debates. Students are expected to demonstrate how their work expands or diverges from prior research, addressing gaps or offering new perspectives. Incorporating evidence—statistics, comparisons, ethnographic examples—strengthens the argument, providing concrete support for claims made within the paper.

The analysis section is central to the paper, requiring students to interpret their evidence critically. This involves situating findings within broader socio-political, economic, or historical contexts, as well as examining cross-cultural similarities and differences. Comparative analysis might include variations across geographic regions, demographic groups, or temporal periods. Applying specific theoretical frameworks—for instance, intersectionality, agency, personhood—enhances analytical depth. Exploring social roles, cultural values, and meanings reveals nuanced insights into the studied phenomenon.

The conclusion synthesizes the main arguments, restates the thesis, and discusses the significance and implications of the research. It may pose new questions or suggestions for future studies, emphasizing the ongoing importance of anthropological inquiry. Transition sentences between sections should create a cohesive narrative flow, demonstrating logical progression of ideas.

Students are encouraged to consult with instructors and peers, utilize drafts and revisions, and engage in peer review forums to refine their work. Proper academic integrity, formatting, and citation practices are essential for success in this assignment, which aims to develop scholarly writing, critical thinking, and research skills relevant to anthropology.

References

• Eriksen, Thomas Hylland. (2010). Small places, large issues: An introduction to social and cultural anthropology. Pluto Press.
• Geertz, Clifford. (1973). “Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture.” The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.
• Marcus, George E. & Fischer, Michael M. J. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. University of Chicago Press.
• Ortner, Sherry B. (2016). “Unpacking the knapsack of culture.” Ethnographic Discourse, Power, and Practice. University of California Press.
• Robben, Antonius C.G.M. & Sluka, Jeffrey A. (2007). Ethnographic fieldwork: An anthropological reader. University of California Press.
• Foucault, Michel. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage Books.
• Lambek, Michael. (2010). “Personhood and intersectionality in anthropology.” Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 263–279.
• Malinowski, Bronislaw. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. Routledge.
• Comaroff, John L. & Comaroff, Jean. (1992). “Ethnicity, conflict, and the politics of difference in South Africa.” Anthropological Quarterly, 65(3), 171-189.
• Hymes, Dell. (1962). “The ethnography of speaking.” Directions in Sociolinguistics. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.