Apa Format Cover Page 12 Font Double Space Cites References

Apa Format Coverpage 12 Font Duble Space Cites Refe

Requirements : Apa format ,coverpage 12 font duble space , cites , references a must!!!! Pase read directions throughly and complete as directed. Morality and Social Responsibility Philosophical perspectives and theories on morality contribute to an understanding of the deep-rooted human need to question the role human beings play in society. Whether your views align with those of Aristotle, Kant, or Mill, you can explore the reasons behind your inherent motivation to act responsibly. At the outset of your life, you develop habits of thought based on what you are exposed to, where you live, with whom you live, and your experiences.

In this Application Assignment, you critically examine these experiences as well as theoretical perspectives on morality and assess how they impact your moral and cultural identity. You also assess how these experiences influence your concept of social responsibility. To prepare for this Assignment: Read the articles by Brink (2014), Johnson (2014), and Kraut (2014) in this week’s resources. Summarize the key points of each theory. Does one theory resonate with you more than another?

Why or why not? Make connections to your own culture. Consider whether these three theories are reflected in your own culture. Review the Cultural Genogram: Dimensions of Culture document in this week’s Resources. Think about the ways different dimensions of culture inform your moral identity (e.g., how your national, ethnic, and/or gender identity informs your moral identity).

Consider how different dimensions of culture inform your concept of social responsibility. To complete this Assignment: Write a 2-page analysis connecting the three theories of morality to your own cultural identity. Explain how the theories align or do not align with your cultural identity. Include how cultural identity impacts social responsibility. Provide at least three references using proper APA format.

Required Resources Readings Loeb, P. R. (2010). Soul of a citizen: Living with conviction in challenging times (rev. ed.). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin.

Chapter 1, “Making Our Lives Count†(pp. 21–41) Chapter 2, “We Don’t Have to Be Saintsâ€(pp. 42–63) Brink, D. (2014). Mill’s moral and political philosophy. In E.

N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2014 ed.). Retrieved from The golden rule . (1991). In A. Wilson (Ed.), World scripture: A comparative anthology of sacred texts (pp.

114–115). St. Paul, MN: Paragon House. Used by permission of Paragon House. Johnson, R. (2014).

Kant’s moral philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2014 ed.). Retrieved from Kraut, R. (2014).

Aristotle’s ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2014 ed.). Retrieved from Document: Cultural Genogram: Dimensions of Culture (Word document) Media Laureate Education (Producer). (2015a).

Exploring the foundations of social responsibility [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 4 minutes.

Paper For Above instruction

The exploration of morality through philosophical perspectives offers profound insights into how individuals conceive of their responsibilities within society. This paper critically examines three prominent theories of morality—Aristotle’s virtue ethics, Kant’s deontological ethics, and Mill’s utilitarianism—and analyzes their relevance and resonance within my own cultural identity, as well as their influence on my understanding of social responsibility. By integrating these perspectives with my personal experiences and cultural background, I aim to articulate how moral theories shape my worldview and sense of ethical duty.

Aristotle’s virtue ethics emphasizes the development of moral character and virtues such as courage, temperance, and wisdom. Aristotle posits that a good life is achieved through the cultivation of virtues, which are cultivated through habituation and deliberate practice (Kraut, 2014). In my culture, virtues such as respect, filial piety, and community responsibility align with Aristotle’s focus on character. Growing up in a culture that esteems communal harmony and moral integrity, I have internalized virtues similar to Aristotle’s conception, emphasizing personal moral development as central to ethical living.

Kant’s moral philosophy centers on the concept of duty and the categorical imperative, which mandates acting according to principles that could be universalized (Johnson, 2014). Kant advocates for moral actions derived from rationality and adherence to moral law rather than consequences. From my cultural perspective, Kant’s emphasis on duty resonates with societal expectations that prioritize moral consistency and integrity. For instance, in my cultural context, honesty and respect for authority are regarded as moral imperatives, reflective of Kantian principles that uphold universal moral duties regardless of circumstances.

Mill’s utilitarianism focuses on maximizing overall happiness and minimizing suffering (Brink, 2014). This consequentialist approach evaluates the morality of actions based on their outcomes. In my cultural setting, the collective well-being often takes precedence, aligning with Mill’s emphasis on societal happiness. For example, community decisions often aim to enhance collective welfare, illustrating the influence of utilitarian thinking on social responsibility in my environment. While Mill’s theory promotes a pragmatic approach to morality, it occasionally clashes with Kantian ideals that emphasize duty over outcome.

Reflecting on these theories, I find that Aristotle’s virtue ethics most closely resonates with my cultural identity. Growing up in a community where moral character and interpersonal virtues are central, I have internalized virtues that promote social cohesion and personal integrity. The emphasis on character and habituation aligns with my cultural experiences, fostering a sense of moral responsibility rooted in virtue cultivation. However, elements of Kantian duty also influence my perception of moral integrity, especially the importance of consistent moral principles in maintaining ethical standards.

Furthermore, these moral theories significantly shape my understanding of social responsibility. Aristotle’s focus on virtues encourages active engagement in fostering community well-being, while Kant’s emphasis on duty underscores the importance of acting according to moral principles regardless of outcomes. Mill’s utilitarianism advocates for actions that benefit the greatest number, often informing community and societal decisions aimed at maximizing happiness. My cultural identity integrates these perspectives, emphasizing virtues such as respect and responsibility, while also recognizing the importance of principles and collective welfare.

In conclusion, the interplay between these moral theories and my cultural identity enhances my comprehension of social responsibility. While Aristotle’s virtue ethics resonates most deeply, the perspectives of Kant and Mill contribute uniquely to shaping my ethical outlook. My cultural background informs my moral character and sense of duty, guiding me to act responsibly toward others and society. Understanding these diverse philosophical perspectives enriches my ability to navigate moral complexities and fosters a commitment to contributing positively to my community and beyond.

References

• Brink, D. (2014). Mill’s moral and political philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2014 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill-moral-political/
• Johnson, R. (2014). Kant’s moral philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2014 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/
• Kraut, R. (2014). Aristotle’s ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2014 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics/
• Loeb, P. R. (2010). Soul of a citizen: Living with conviction in challenging times. St. Martin’s Griffin.
• World scripture: A comparative anthology of sacred texts (1991). In A. Wilson (Ed.), Paragon House.
• Exploring the foundations of social responsibility [Video file]. (2015). Laureate Education.