Apple Juice Or Sugar Water In The Early 1980s Beech Nut A.Ma

Apple Juice Or Sugar Waterin The Early 1980s Beech Nut A Maker Of Ba

Apple Juice or Sugar Water? In the early 1980s Beech-Nut, a maker of baby foods, was in grave financial trouble as it tried to compete with Gerber Products, the market leader. Threatened with bankruptcy if it could not lower its operating costs, Beech-Nut entered an agreement with a low-cost supplier of apple juice concentrate. The agreement would save the company over $250,000 annually when every dollar counted. Soon one of Beech-Nut’s food scientists became concerned about the quality of the concentrate. He believed it was not made from apples alone but contained large quantities of corn syrup and cane sugar. He brought this information to the attention of top managers at Beech-Nut, but they were obsessed with the need to keep costs down and chose to ignore his concerns. The company continued to produce and sell its product as pure apple juice. Eventually, investigators from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) confronted Beech-Nut with evidence that the concentrate was adulterated. The top managers issued denials and quickly shipped the remaining stock of apple juice to the market before their inventory could be seized. The scientist who had questioned the purity of the apple juice had resigned from Beech-Nut, but he decided to blow the whistle on the company. He told the FDA that Beech-Nut’s top management had known of the problem with the concentrate and had acted to maximize company profits rather than to inform customers about the additives in the apple juice. In 1987 the company pleaded guilty to charges that it had deliberately sold adulterated juice and was fined over $2 million. Its top managers were also found guilty and were sentenced to prison terms. The company’s reputation was ruined, and it was eventually sold to Ralston Purina, which installed a new management team and a new ethical code of values to guide future business decisions. In the discussion, answer the following questions; 1.- Why is it that an organization’s values and norms can become too strong and lead to unethical behavior? 2.- What steps can a company take to prevent this problem—to stop its values and norms from becoming so inwardly focused that managers and employees lose sight of their responsibility to their stakeholders?

Paper For Above instruction

The case of Beech-Nut illustrates how organizational values and norms can become so internally fortified that they inadvertently foster unethical behavior. Values and norms are fundamental to shaping organizational culture; however, when they become overly rigid or misaligned with broader ethical standards, they can lead to environment where unethical actions are rationalized or overlooked. This phenomenon often occurs in organizations under intense pressure to meet financial targets or competitive demands, where there is a strong emphasis on results over process. In such contexts, employees and managers may develop a conformist attitude, prioritizing organizational success regardless of the means, especially if the organizational culture implicitly encourages cost-cutting or deception as acceptable shortcuts to achieving goals.

One of the primary reasons organizational values might become too strong is due to a phenomenon known as moral licensing. When employees or managers believe that their role within the organization confers moral superiority or exempts them from standard ethical considerations, they may justify unethical behaviors. For example, in the Beech-Nut case, the management believed that maintaining profitability justified their actions, despite violating legal and ethical standards. Similarly, organizational norms can become so ingrained that employees perceive unethical behavior as a norm or acceptable within their work environment, especially if such behaviors have historically gone unpunished or unnoticed.

To prevent organizational values and norms from becoming inwardly focused to the point of promoting unethical conduct, companies need to adopt comprehensive ethics-management strategies. First, establishing a strong and visible ethical culture is essential; this includes top management explicitly communicating the importance of ethics and integrity as core organizational values. Leaders should exemplify ethical behavior, thereby setting a standard for employees. Second, implementing formal ethical training and continuous ethics education helps reinforce the importance of responsible decision-making aligned with stakeholder interests. An effective ethics program involves clear reporting channels for unethical behavior, coupled with protections for whistleblowers, which encourages employees to raise concerns without fear of retaliation.

Third, organizations must regularly review and update their values and standards to ensure they remain relevant and aligned with societal expectations and legal requirements. Embedding ethical considerations into performance appraisals and incentive systems also discourages cutthroat behaviors aimed solely at short-term gains. Additionally, fostering an organizational climate where transparency and accountability are valued can reduce the likelihood of unethical practices. Such a culture encourages employees to scrutinize actions and decisions critically, thus discouraging conformity to unethical norms.

Moreover, organizations should integrate stakeholder perspectives into their decision-making processes. Engaging stakeholders—customers, suppliers, communities, and regulators—ensures that the organization remains sensitive to external ethical expectations and societal norms. This stakeholder-centric approach acts as a safeguard, grounding organizational values in external accountability rather than internal pressure alone. Finally, promoting ethical leadership at all levels and encouraging open dialogue about ethical dilemmas can cultivate an environment where ethical considerations are always at the forefront.

In sum, while organizational values and norms are vital for guiding behavior, an overemphasis on internal conformity can lead to misconduct. It is incumbent upon organizations to cultivate a balanced ethical climate—anchored in transparent, stakeholder-oriented values—that prioritizes integrity over expedience. By adopting proactive measures such as ethics training, stakeholder engagement, and leadership exemplification, companies can safeguard against the risks of inward-focused norms and foster a sustainable, ethical organizational culture.

References

• Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2017). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to Do It Right. John Wiley & Sons.
• Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2019). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases. Cengage Learning.
• Jones, T. M. (2013). Ethical Decision Making and Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 573-585.
• Kerns, C. D. (2003). Building an Ethical Organization: An Empowered Old West Town. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 27-41.
• Kaptein, M. (2011). Understanding unethical behavior by unraveling ethical culture. Human Relations, 64(6), 843-869.
• Donaldson, T., & Werhane, P. H. (2008). Ethical dilemma of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 203-230.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Kidder, R. M. (2005). How Good People Make Tough Choices: Resolving the Dilemmas of Ethical Living.
• Moore, C., & Gino, F. (2015). Ethics and the Pursuit of Excess. Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 60-67.
• Thakur, S., & Kshirsagar, P. (2020). Developing Ethical Leadership in Organizations: A Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 162, 227-242.