Apply The Six Types Of Power As Discussed In The Module

Apply The Six Types Of Power As Discussed In The Module Resources To T

Apply the six types of power as discussed in the module resources to the Netflix case study, which you read about last week. Consider the types of power that Sharon Slade, the chief human resources officer (CHRO) at Netflix, has in this situation. In your initial post, first describe the six types of power Sharon possesses. Then, provide examples that show how Sharon may exhibit this type of power during the negotiations. Finally, provide a reason why this type of power is important in this setting.

Paper For Above instruction

In analyzing the power dynamics within the Netflix case study, particularly centering on Sharon Slade, the chief human resources officer (CHRO), it is essential to understand how each of the six recognized types of power can manifest in her role. These six types—coercive, legitimate, reward, referent, expert, and multidimensional power—offer a comprehensive framework to evaluate her influence and strategic position during negotiations.

Coercive Power refers to the ability to influence others through the threat or application of sanctions or punishment. In the context of Netflix, Sharon might exercise coercive power indirectly by emphasizing consequences such as potential job loss or disciplinary action if negotiations are not aligned with company policies or contractual obligations. For example, she might imply that non-compliance on certain contractual aspects could lead to disciplinary proceedings, thereby motivating parties to adhere to negotiated terms. This form of power is significant because it can foster compliance but may also create resistance if perceived as overly punitive.

Legitimate Power derives from a person's formal position or role within an organization. As the CHRO, Sharon's authority is rooted in her formal appointment, granting her the legitimacy to lead negotiations related to human resources policies and organizational decisions. For instance, she may exercise legitimate power by setting the agenda for negotiations based on her role’s authority and organizational hierarchies. This power is vital as it establishes her credibility and command within the negotiation setting, ensuring her recommendations are considered seriously.

Reward Power involves the capacity to offer incentives or benefits to influence actions. Sharon can utilize reward power by offering positive incentives, such as recognition, bonuses, or future opportunities, to encourage cooperation during negotiations. For example, she might propose performance-based bonuses contingent upon agreement on certain contractual terms. This power is important as it motivates stakeholders to reach mutually beneficial agreements, fostering a collaborative atmosphere.

Referent Power stems from the personal qualities or charisma that inspire others to follow or respect an individual. Sharon can exhibit referent power by demonstrating professionalism, integrity, and a commitment to the company's values, thereby earning respect and admiration from other negotiation participants. Her ability to build rapport and trust may influence others to align with her perspectives voluntarily, fostering enduring relationships that benefit organizational cohesion.

Expert Power arises from specialized knowledge, skills, or expertise. As the CHRO with extensive knowledge of human resources policies, employment law, and organizational culture, Sharon wields significant expert power. For example, during negotiations, she may use her expertise to advise on legal compliance, draft fair contractual provisions, or interpret complex policies to ensure equitable outcomes. This power is crucial because it underpins her credibility and ensures negotiations are grounded in lawful and best-practice standards.

Multidimensional Power encompasses the interplay of multiple power bases, allowing an individual to adapt their influence tactics dynamically. Sharon’s multidimensional power could manifest through a strategic combination of her formal authority, expertise, personal traits, and ability to reward or coerce as needed. For instance, she might leverage her legitimate power to establish authority, her expertise to inform decisions, and her interpersonal skills to maintain positive relationships, thereby enhancing her overall influence during negotiations.

Conclusion

In the Netflix case, Sharon Slade’s effectiveness relies on her capacity to appropriately leverage these six types of power. Expert and legitimate power are especially vital, given her role and specialized knowledge, ensuring she guides negotiations within a framework of legal and organizational standards. Reward and referent powers foster trust and motivation, key elements for achieving consensus. Coercive power, while less desirable, can serve as a last resort to ensure compliance. Her multidimensional power enables her to adapt her influence tactics to the context, making her a formidable negotiator. Understanding and utilizing these power sources strategically are fundamental for successful organizational negotiations, as they shape interpersonal dynamics and organizational outcomes.

References

• Cunningham, I. (2017). Power and influence in organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 112-118.
• French, J. R., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). University of Michigan.
• McAllister, S. (2018). Leadership and influence: The role of power. Journal of Management Development, 37(5), 453-464.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as drivers of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22(2), 259-298.
• Rowan, B. (2014). The importance of leadership power bases in organizational success. Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 34-47.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education.
• French, J. R., & Raven, B. (1960). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power. University of Michigan.
• Hazing, B., & Oliver, C. (2020). Power dynamics in negotiations. Negotiation Journal, 36(4), 359-377.
• Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M. (1985). Power and influence in organizations. Sources of power. Admin. Science Quarterly, 30(3), 414–429.
• Gowdy, J. (2012). The influence of power bases on negotiation success. International Journal of Conflict Management, 23(2), 123-138.