Applying The Communication Process This Assignment Serves As

Applying The Communication Processthis Assignment Serves As A Bridge Be

This assignment serves as a bridge between the early chapters of our course, which cover what communication is, why it is important to study, how it influences our identity, and how we interact in different situations, and the later chapters that focus on formal presentations. The task involves analyzing President Obama's 2014 State of the Union address using the elements of the communication process (the Transactional Communication Model).

First, watch the 2014 State of the Union address. A link to the video and transcript will be provided. If the link doesn’t work, search for “2014 State of the Union Address” online. Next, review Chapter 1 of our textbook, which discusses the transactional communication model. Then, analyze Obama's speech by identifying each part of the communication model in the context of this speech. For example, consider the context or occasion, such as the formal setting in which the speech takes place, the audience (Congress and the nation), and how the speech is also broadcast on media to the entire world. Comment on details like the time of day, location, and why the speech is held at that specific time and place, and how these factors influence both the speaker and the audience.

Your analysis should include a detailed examination of how each element of the communication model interacts in this situation, especially focusing on the message, the sender and receiver, and the feedback loop. Be sure to clearly define who the intended recipient of the message is. Finally, post your thorough analysis to the assignment area. You may attach a document or type directly into the box.

Paper For Above instruction

The 2014 State of the Union address delivered by President Barack Obama offers a rich example to analyze within the framework of the communication process. This speech exemplifies the transactional nature of communication, involving multiple elements such as the speaker (sender), the audience (receiver), message, context, and feedback. By examining these components, we can better understand how effective communication occurs in a formal setting and how various elements influence the message's delivery and reception.

Context and Occasion: The State of the Union address is a formal event held annually in the United States. It takes place in the chamber of Congress, specifically in the House of Representatives, and is broadcast nationwide and globally. It usually occurs in the evening, around primetime hours, to ensure maximum viewership. The occasion is significant because it marks the beginning of the legislative year, and the speech summarizes the past accomplishments while outlining future goals. The formal setting and timing emphasize its importance and influence both the speaker's tone and the audience's reception. The fact that the speech is televised nationally and internationally makes it a highly strategic communication event, aiming to reach a broad and diverse audience.

Sender and Receiver: President Obama, as the sender, carefully crafted his speech to communicate with various receivers: the American public, Congress, international viewers, and future historians. Each group interprets the message differently based on their perspectives and interests. The receiver's role is active, as they interpret, respond, or react to the speech, intentionally or unconsciously. The multimedia broadcast allows feedback to occur indirectly through public opinion, media commentary, and political responses.

Message and Channels: The message includes political achievements, policy proposals, and national priorities. Obama employed both verbal language and nonverbal cues such as gestures and facial expressions to enhance his message’s clarity and emotional appeal. The channels include spoken words, televised visuals, and written transcripts available afterward, which serve to reinforce the message and ensure clarity and accessibility.

Feedback and Noise: Feedback in this context is indirect—public reactions, media coverage, and congressional responses indicate whether the message was understood and accepted. Noise factors could include political polarization, media bias, or misinterpretation of messages, which might distort or block the intended meaning. The strategic timing of the speech and its delivery style aim to minimize misunderstandings and maximize clarity.

In conclusion, President Obama's 2014 State of the Union address illustrates the complex and dynamic nature of communication within the transactional model. Every element, from context to feedback, plays a critical role in ensuring the message achieves its purpose. The formal occasion, combined with powerful verbal and nonverbal communication, demonstrates how leaders craft messages that resonate across different audiences, emphasizing the importance of understanding each component of the communication process for effective public speaking and message dissemination.

References

• Beebe, S. A., Beebe, S. J., & Redmond, M. V. (2017). Interpersonal communication: Relating to others. Pearson.
• DeVito, J. A. (2019). The interpersonal communication book. Pearson.
• McQuail, D. (2010). Mass communication theory. Sage.
• Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2017). Theories of human communication. Wadsworth Publishing.
• Schramm, W. (1954). How communication works. Journal of Communication, 4(3), 3-9.
• Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (2011). Pragmatics of human communication. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.
• Ramirez, M., & Witz, E. (2012). Media and political communication. Journal of Political Studies, 15(2), 45-60.
• Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 173–199.
• Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Doubleday.