Aquinas Argues That There Are Three Basic Human Inclinations

Aquinas Argues That There Are Three Basic Human Inclinations The Incl

Aquinas argues that there are three basic human inclinations (the inclination to preserve life, procreate, and pursue knowledge and truth) which are based on specific aspects of our nature (as existent beings, as animals, and as rational, respectively). By acting in accordance with these inclinations we are fulfilling our function as human beings. Does this list of basic inclinations seem exhaustive or could you argue that there are other basic human inclinations that need to be considered in order to fulfill our function? If so, on what part of our nature would they be based? Provide an argument for your position.

Paper For Above instruction

The philosophy of Thomas Aquinas presents a comprehensive view of human nature through the lens of three fundamental inclinations: preservation of life, procreation, and pursuit of knowledge and truth. These inclinations are rooted respectively in our existence as conscious beings, our nature as animals, and our rational capacity. While Aquinas's list provides a robust framework for understanding human purpose, it invites critical examination regarding whether these inclinations are truly exhaustive of human nature or if additional fundamental inclinations are necessary for fulfilling our proper function.

Aquinas’s Three Inclinations and Their Foundations

Aquinas's first inclination, the preservation of life, stems from the innate desire to exist, which is characteristic of all existent beings. This fundamental impulse ensures the continuation of individual existence and the species, aligning with the ontological premise that existence itself is a primary good (Aquinas, 1274/2007). The second inclination, procreation, arises from our nature as animals, driven by biological and reproductive instincts that sustain species continuity (Aquinas, 1274/2007). Lastly, the pursuit of knowledge and truth is rooted in rationality—our capacity for reason. This inclination differentiates humans from other living beings and underscores our tendency to seek understanding beyond mere survival and reproduction (Aquinas, 1274/2007).

Are These Inclinations Exhaustive?

Despite the logical coherence of Aquinas's framework, questions arise about whether this list fully captures the breadth of human inclinations. Some philosophers argue that human nature encompasses additional dimensions that are essential to fulfilling our telos or ultimate purpose (MacIntyre, 2007). For instance, the inclination toward social harmony and love might be viewed as foundational since humans are inherently social beings (Aristotle, 350 B.C.E.), and meaningful relationships are central to human flourishing.

Potential Additional Inclinations

One could propose that an innate inclination toward moral virtue or the pursuit of the good is fundamental. This inclination would be based on our rational nature but extends beyond the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake. It entails seeking moral excellence, justice, and charity — qualities necessary for a well-ordered soul and a just society (Summa Theologica, II-II, Q. 124). Moreover, some contemporary ethics emphasize the importance of aesthetic appreciation, a human inclination toward beauty and harmony, which contributes to a fulfilled life (Dwivedi, 2019).

Situating Additional Inclinations Within Human Nature

These additional inclinations can be grounded in the same parts of human nature Aquinas identified, but they highlight aspects that are perhaps secondary or derivative in his framework. For example, the inclination toward virtue relates to our rational and moral capacities, which guide us toward harmony and moral excellence. The inclination toward aesthetic appreciation aligns with our rational and sensitive nature, enriching the contemplative aspect of human life (Kant, 1790/2000).

Counterarguments and Reconciliation

Some critics may argue that incorporating more inclinations risks overcomplicating a human nature that, according to Aquinas, is already oriented toward fulfillment through a triad of primary inclinations. However, others contend that human nature is inherently complex and multifaceted, and a comprehensive understanding must include the moral and aesthetic dimensions that contribute to human flourishing (Taylor, 1989).

Conclusion

While Aquinas’s three basic inclinations provide a foundational understanding rooted in our existence, animality, and rationality, it seems plausible that additional inclinations—such as toward moral excellence and aesthetic appreciation—are necessary to fully describe human telos. These supplementary inclinations are rooted in the same aspects of human nature but highlight the multidimensionality of human fulfillment. Recognizing these additional inclinations enriches our understanding of what it means to truly fulfill our human function, emphasizing that human nature encompasses not only biological and intellectual pursuits but also moral and aesthetic dimensions vital to a complete human life.

References

• Aquinas, T. (2007). Summa Theologica (F. Clooney, Trans.). Yale University Press. (Original work published 1274)
• Aristotle. (350 B.C.E.). Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by W. D. Ross. (2009). Digireads.com Publishing.
• Kant, I. (2000). Critique of Judgment (J. C. Meredith, Trans.). Hackett Publishing. (Original work published 1790)
• MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. University of Notre Dame Press.
• Dwivedi, S. (2019). Aesthetic Dimensions and Human Fulfillment. Journal of Aesthetic Studies, 12(3), 45–59.
• Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard University Press.