Are You Ready To Write Your First Discussion? 288499
Prepareas You Prepare To Write Your First Discussion For This Week C
Prepare: As you prepare to write your first discussion for this week, complete the following: Read An Introduction to Logic and Syllogisms Watch Syllogism, Mood, and Figure Review the grading rubric for this discussion Reflect: Before drafting your initial post, take time to reflect on the rhetorical situation and the appeal to logos in your paper. Have you given logic and reason enough emphasis? Are you concerned about fallacies in your work? Think about your argument, its claims, and the supporting evidence. Have you developed a logical argument supported by credible evidence? Write (due Thursday, Day 3): Utilize your outline to make a list of every claim and all supporting evidence for your argument thus far, keeping an eye on the appeal to logos. Each claim should be written by you in your own words and should introduce a part of your unique argument. Paraphrase or summarize your supporting evidence and include a proper APA-style in-text citation. You may include multiple pieces of evidence for each claim. List your thesis statement, claims, and evidence in the following format: Thesis statement: Write your single-sentence thesis statement here. Claim: Write your first claim in a complete sentence here. Evidence: Paraphrase or summarize your source and cite it here (Sample, 2015). Evidence: Paraphrase or summarize additional sources that support this claim and cite them here as 2., 3., 4., and so on (Sample, 2015). Evidence: If you feel the need to use a quote, “add it to the list with proper quotation marks and the appropriate in-text citation containing the page, section, or paragraph number in the original source” (Sample, 2015, p. 22). Claim: Write your second claim in a complete sentence here. Evidence: Paraphrase or summarize your source here (Sample, 2015). Evidence: Continue to paraphrase and summarize your sources for each claim (Sample, 2015). Claim: Continue to write your claims in complete sentences. Evidence Evidence In 200 to 300 words, compare your claims and evidence to the common fallacies described in “An Introduction to Logic and Syllogisms." Describe any fallacies you locate and describe how you will remove those fallacies this week. Describe how your claims logically support your thesis statement as well-supported premises. Be sure to use the correct vocabulary when discussing fallacy: Slippery slope, hasty generalization, post hoc ergo propter hoc, either/or, ad hominem, etc. End your post with any questions or concerns you have regarding the appeal to logos, the use of supporting evidence, the role of claims in an argument, or fallacies. Please review the Week Three Discussion 1 Initial Post Template before writing your response.
Paper For Above instruction
The process of constructing a logical and persuasive argument begins with careful preparation, critical reflection, and meticulous organization. This week’s discussion requires a comprehensive analysis of your argumentative claims and supporting evidence, emphasizing the appeal to logos, or logical reasoning, to ensure your argument is credible and effective. The prerequisite readings, including "An Introduction to Logic and Syllogisms" and supplementary videos on syllogism, mood, and figure, serve to deepen your understanding of logical structures, fallacies, and valid reasoning patterns.
To start, the preparatory phase involves a thorough engagement with the assigned texts. "An Introduction to Logic and Syllogisms" offers foundational knowledge about constructing valid syllogisms, recognizing logical forms, and understanding common fallacies. Watching the videos on syllogisms further clarifies how logical arguments are structured through mood and figure, which is crucial for evaluating and strengthening one's reasoning skills. These resources collectively lay the groundwork for crafting a solid argument.
The next step involves reflects critically on your rhetorical situation and your use of logos. An effective analysis examines whether your claims are well-justified through credible evidence and whether fallacies may undermine your argument. It is essential to assess if your reasoning relies solely on sound logic or if it inadvertently employs common fallacies such as slippery slope, hasty generalization, false dichotomy, ad hominem, or post hoc ergo propter hoc, which can weaken your credibility.
When creating your initial post, utilize your outline to systematically list each claim, paraphrased or summarized supporting evidence, and proper APA citations. Ensure that each claim is distinct, and that your evidence logically supports the claim, contributing to the overall argument's coherence and strength. The format should include a clear thesis statement, followed by claims and supporting evidence, expressed in your own words, with appropriate citations to establish credibility. This structured presentation allows for clarity and persuasiveness.
In your comparison of claims and evidence against common fallacies, critically evaluate whether any of your reasoning is fallacious. For example, if a claim relies on hasty generalization based on insufficient data, identify this fallacy and describe how you will discard or revise it. Similarly, for other fallacies like post hoc or false dilemma, propose strategies to eliminate them by strengthening your evidence, reframing your claims, or introducing nuanced alternatives.
Finally, articulate how your claims support your thesis, functioning as well-supported premises within your logical framework. Use precise vocabulary related to fallacies throughout your analysis. Conclude your post with questions or concerns about the role of logos in your argument, the adequacy of your supporting evidence, or potential fallacies. This reflection enhances your awareness of the logical quality of your argument and guides your writing process in upcoming drafts.
References
(Include credible sources such as scholarly articles, textbooks on logic, and academic publications formatted in APA style).