Argosy University School Of Education Rubric Class 2 E6037 M

Argosy Universityschool Of Education Rubriclasa 2 E6037 Making Decisio

Analyze a specific site related to education, identifying key data and understanding the problem or situation. Connect this data to student learning outcomes and make informed, data-driven decisions. Evaluate leadership skills, strategies, and theories/models relevant to professional development and instructional decisions. Develop a timeline of activities to implement your decisions within a school year. Create a professional presentation that clearly communicates your analysis, decisions, and plan, engaging the audience effectively and integrating outside information where appropriate.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of making data-driven decisions in an educational setting is critical for fostering student growth and improving instructional practices. This paper explores the systematic analysis of a specific school site, emphasizing data collection, understanding the problem, applying leadership skills, evaluating relevant theories, and developing an actionable timeline for professional development. By integrating these components, educational leaders can effectively implement change and support continuous student achievement.

Understanding the specific context of a school site is foundational to effective decision-making. In this analysis, the site selected is a mid-sized urban elementary school facing challenges related to literacy achievement gaps among diverse student populations. The site’s demographic includes a high percentage of English Language Learners (ELLs), students from low-income families, and a culturally diverse community. Recognizing these factors helps contextualize the problem and guides data collection efforts.

The core issue identified at this site is the persistently low reading proficiency rates, which are below district and state benchmarks. To address this, a comprehensive analysis of available data is necessary, including standardized test scores, formative assessments, attendance records, and teacher observations. Key data points reveal that students from ELL backgrounds and those in lower socioeconomic strata are disproportionately represented among those performing below expectations. Understanding these disparities informs targeted interventions.

Connecting data to student learning outcomes involves examining how specific factors such as language barriers, resource availability, and instructional strategies influence achievement. For example, analysis indicates that most struggling readers lack consistent access to quality literacy programs and that classroom instruction varies significantly across grade levels. This understanding emphasizes the importance of standardizing effective practices and providing targeted professional development for teachers.

Leadership plays a vital role in implementing data-driven strategies. Effective leaders utilize specific skills and strategies including fostering a school culture of continuous improvement, engaging stakeholders, and facilitating collaboration among staff. Leadership skills such as developing trust, communicating a clear vision, and using data to inform instruction are essential. Strategies applied at the site include forming professional learning communities (PLCs), implementing data meetings, and providing coaching to support literacy initiatives tailored to the diverse student body.

Understanding and applying relevant theories and models enhances professional development and instructional decision-making. For instance, the use of the Data-Driven Decision Model (DDDM) enables educators to analyze data thoroughly and select interventions grounded in evidence. Additionally, the Response to Intervention (RTI) framework supports tiered instruction to meet the needs of struggling learners systematically. These models inform the development of targeted strategies that are responsive to the specific needs highlighted by the data.

An effective timeline is crucial for organizing activities targeted at improving literacy outcomes. The proposed plan spans a school year with phased implementation: initial data analysis and professional development in the first two months; curriculum alignment and resource allocation in months three and four; targeted interventions and coaching throughout the middle months; and ongoing monitoring and adjustments during the final months. This timeline ensures systematic progress and accountability, with specific milestones and review sessions to measure efficacy.

The professional presentation of this plan aims to engage stakeholders through clear, organized communication. Visual aids such as PowerPoint slides will highlight key findings, data visualizations, and strategic steps. The presentation will integrate outside research and best practices in literacy instruction, emphasizing how data-informed strategies can transform the educational experience. Audience participation will be encouraged through discussion prompts, fostering collective ownership of the improvement process.

In conclusion, effective school decisions are rooted in comprehensive data analysis, understanding of the contextual challenges, application of leadership strategies, and alignment with theoretical frameworks. Developing a detailed timeline and engaging presentation ensures that all stakeholders are informed, motivated, and prepared to implement change that supports student growth. By adopting this systematic approach, educational leaders can foster an environment of continuous improvement and targeted professional development that addresses the unique needs of their student population.

References

• Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.
• Dufour, R., Dufour, R., & Eaker, R. (2008). Professional Learning Communities at Work: Best Practices for Enhancing Student Achievement. Solution Tree Press.
• Gersten, R., et al. (2005). Teaching Reading to Diverse Learners. The Guilford Press.
• Likert, R. (1967). The Human Organization: Its Management and Value. McGraw-Hill.
• Marzano, R. J. (2003). What Works in Schools: Translating Research into Action. ASCD.
• O’Connor, R. E. (2007). Using Data to Improve Student Achievement. Routledge.
• Slavin, R. E. (2009). Best Evidence Synthesis: An Analysis of the Use of Data for Educational Decision-Making. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 299-305.
• Stiggins, R. (2005). From Formative Assessment to Assessment FOR Learning: A Path to Success in Standards-Based Schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-328.
• Twombly, S. B., et al. (2012). Using Data to Make Educational Decisions. Routledge.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Harvard University Press.