Argument Essay: Write A 1000-Word Response To Activity 5

Argument Essaywrite A 1000 Word Response Toactivity 5 In Doing So

Write a 1000-word response to Activity #5. In doing so, consider the Saint Leo University Core Value of Integrity emphasized in this course. This assignment asks you to address qualities of leadership. 5. What is the relationship between integrity and leadership? Please include in your writing your own definition of Integrity and whether those in leadership roles are assumed to have (or demonstrate) integrity. There is below the Saint Leo Core Value: Core Values: Integrity: The commitment of Saint Leo University to excellence demands that its members live its mission and deliver on its promise. The faculty, staff and students pledge to be honest, just and consistent in word and deed. Excellence: Saint Leo University is an educational enterprise. All of us, individually and collectively, work hard to ensure that our students develop the character, learn the skills and assimilate the knowledge essential to become morally responsible leaders. The success of our University depends upon a conscientious commitment to our mission, vision and goals.

Paper For Above instruction

The relationship between integrity and leadership is fundamental to fostering trust, credibility, and ethical conduct within any organization or community. Integrity, defined as the adherence to moral and ethical principles, honesty, and consistency in actions, is often regarded as a cornerstone of effective leadership. Leaders who demonstrate integrity inspire confidence among followers, set moral standards, and create an environment where ethical behavior is valued and encouraged. Conversely, a lack of integrity can lead to mistrust, organizational failure, and damaged reputations. This essay explores the intertwined relationship between integrity and leadership, presents a personal definition of integrity, and discusses whether individuals in leadership roles are expected to or should demonstrate integrity.

My personal definition of integrity encompasses honest and transparent conduct, unwavering commitment to moral principles, and consistency between words and actions. Integrity involves doing what is right, even when no one is watching, and taking responsibility for one’s decisions and behaviors. It also includes a dedication to fairness, respect for others, and a willingness to admit mistakes and rectify wrongdoings. This comprehensive understanding aligns with the core values of Saint Leo University, emphasizing honesty, justice, and moral responsibility as essential components.

In the context of leadership, integrity is not merely an asset but an essential quality that underpins effective and ethical management. Leaders serve as role models and decision-makers; their actions influence organizational culture, employee morale, and stakeholder trust. Leaders who demonstrate integrity establish a moral compass that guides their decisions and inspires others to act ethically. When leaders act with honesty and consistency, they foster an environment of trust, which is crucial for teamwork, collaboration, and the achievement of shared goals.

There is a strong correlation between integrity and leadership effectiveness. Leaders with integrity tend to be more credible and persuasive because their followers trust their words and actions. Trust is a fundamental element of leadership; it facilitates open communication, cooperation, and loyalty. For example, ethical leaders who prioritize transparency and fairness can better navigate crises, motivate employees, and sustain organizational success over the long term. Conversely, a leader lacking integrity may initially appear charismatic or authoritative but ultimately erodes trust and respect when unethical behaviors or dishonesty are uncovered.

Furthermore, integrity enhances a leader’s moral authority. It provides a foundation for making difficult decisions rooted in ethical principles rather than personal gain or expediency. Such leaders are more likely to uphold justice, show accountability, and consistently align their actions with organizational values. In doing so, they reinforce the importance of integrity across the organization, cultivating a culture where ethical conduct is the norm and unethical behavior is challenged and corrected.

Importantly, there is an expectation—though not always a reality—that those in leadership roles possess or demonstrate integrity. Society, organizations, and institutions like Saint Leo University assume leadership figures to be morally upright, honest, and consistent. This expectation stems from the recognition that leadership, by its very nature, involves significant influence and responsibility. Leaders often hold positions of power, making decisions that impact many people’s lives, livelihoods, and well-being. As a result, integrity becomes a necessary attribute to ensure that their influence is used ethically and responsibly.

However, it is essential to acknowledge that not all leaders inherently possess integrity at all times. Some may demonstrate integrity temporarily or selectively, influenced by circumstances, personal interests, or external pressures. Therefore, leadership development programs and ethical training emphasize the importance of cultivating integrity continuously. Leaders are encouraged not only to demonstrate integrity consistently but also to be accountable when lapses occur, fostering a culture of transparency and continuous ethical growth.

Educational institutions like Saint Leo University strive to instill these values in future leaders by emphasizing the importance of moral responsibility, honesty, and justice. The university’s core value of integrity underscores that its members—faculty, staff, and students—must uphold these principles in their words and deeds. This collective commitment to integrity ensures that leadership within the academic community models these values, serving as a foundation for ethical decision-making and responsible leadership.

Moreover, integrity is crucial in contemporary leadership challenges such as navigating ethical dilemmas, ensuring social responsibility, and fostering inclusive environments. Leaders are increasingly scrutinized for their actions in areas like corporate social responsibility, diversity and inclusion, and environmental sustainability. Demonstrating integrity in these domains involves making choices that align with moral principles and the public good rather than short-term gains. Ethical leadership enhances organizational reputation and trustworthiness, essential assets in today’s interconnected and transparent world.

In conclusion, integrity and leadership are inherently linked qualities that reinforce each other. Integrity acts as the moral backbone of effective leadership, fostering trust, credibility, and ethical decision-making. Leaders are expected to embody integrity to serve as role models and uphold organizational and societal values. While integrity should be a constant attribute, continuous effort is necessary to maintain and demonstrate it, especially in complex and challenging situations. Organizations like Saint Leo University exemplify the importance of integrity in leadership by promoting it as a fundamental core value, emphasizing that true leadership is grounded in honesty, justice, and moral responsibility. As future leaders develop these qualities, they contribute to a more ethical, trustworthy, and responsible society and organizational environment.

References

• Brenkert, G. G. (2010). Leadership, ethics, and organizations: An introduction. Routledge.
• Craig, R. (2018). The importance of integrity in leadership. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/02/the-importance-of-integrity-in-leadership
• DuBrin, A. J. (2015). Leadership: Research Findings, Practice, and Skills. Cengage Learning.
• Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. Harper & Row.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.
• Paul, R. W. (2003). Value conflicts and ethical decision making in leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2), 137-152.
• Robinson, S. P., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555-572.
• Shapiro, D. L., & Stefkovich, J. A. (2016). Ethical Leadership and Decision Making in Education: Applying Theoretical Perspectives to Complex Dilemmas. Routledge.
• Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2017). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to Do It Right. Wiley.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson Education.