Argumentative Essay In Week Three Assignment You Enga 332674

Argumentative Essayin The Week Three Assignment You Engaged In A Case

In the Week Three Assignment, you engaged in a case analysis of a current business problem using some of the components of an argumentative essay. In this written assignment, you will write a complete argumentative essay as described in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Foster, Hardy, & Záºà±iga y Postigo, 2015). This essay will include a revised and polished version of your Week Three Assignment, an objection to your thesis, a rebuttal, and concluding remarks.

The strongest possible objection to your thesis. After the final paragraph of your Week Three Case Analysis Assignment, start a new paragraph that introduces the strongest possible objection to your thesis. The considerations for this are detailed in Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Záºà±iga y Postigo, 2015). Make sure to employ the appropriate language to introduce the objection, such as “some may object to my thesis as follows” or “according to [so and so] the thesis presented here fails to account for X” [whatever he or she finds problematic]. You can find other language to do this, of course, but the key point here is to make sure that you indicate that someone else is speaking when presenting this objection. It is also important to remember that you do research to discover good objections and not merely objections that are weak and thus easily rebutted.

Look for peer-reviewed journal articles in the Ashford University Library, full-text articles in Google Scholar, or articles in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Present the opposing position fairly and in detail. This may take more than one paragraph. A rebuttal. This is a refutation of the objection that you have just presented. Start this in a new paragraph following the objection paragraph(s). Once again, follow the indications of Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Záºà±iga y Postigo, 2015). You may point out an error in the objection. Or you may show that, while it is an important objection, it does not apply squarely to your argument, or does not account for facts that make it irrelevant. Above all, make sure to maintain philosophical decorum in your rebuttal.

Toward this end, you should apply the principles of charity and of accuracy, first introduced in the Week One course material. See “Confronting Disagreement” in Section 9.4 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Záºà±iga y Postigo, 2015). Closing remarks. End your argumentative essay with a paragraph of closing remarks. Provide some reflections of what you have attempted to achieve by means of your essay. You could, for example, explain how your essay sheds light on the broader controversy that it addresses. Or you could point out how your essay addresses a frequently ignored point or the unpopular side in the controversy. You could also reflect on the related matters in the broader controversy that would be useful to examine by others. Do not merely summarize what you have done in the body of your essay, and do not add new information here that would support or contradict your essay since the body of the essay should have addressed all the relevant points. See “Closing Your Essay” in Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Záºà±iga y Postigo, 2015).

Paper For Above instruction

The purpose of this essay is to develop a comprehensive and critical argumentative analysis of a current business problem, following the guidelines provided by Hardy, Foster, & Záºà±iga y Postigo (2015). The process involves revising and refining the initial case analysis, thoroughly presenting and defending a central thesis, exploring a well-researched objection to this thesis, providing a reasoned rebuttal, and concluding with reflective insights on the broader significance of the discussion. This structured approach aims to exemplify critical thinking, logical coherence, and scholarly rigor within the scope of an academic essay.

The initial step involves revising the Week Three case analysis, ensuring clarity, precision, and depth in articulating the primary argument. The thesis must be concise yet comprehensive, capturing the core stance on the identified business problem. The subsequent step is to introduce the strongest conceivable objection, sourced from reputable academic literature, media reports, credible online databases such as Google Scholar, or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. This objection should accurately and fairly present the opposing viewpoint, including the reasoning and evidence underpinning it. Demonstrating a nuanced understanding of the opposing position is essential for the intellectual integrity of the essay.

Following the presentation of the objection, the essay must contain a well-structured rebuttal that critically evaluates and counters the objection. This involves identifying potential errors, logical fallacies, or irrelevancies in the objection. Alternatively, the rebuttal can highlight factors or evidence that diminish the force of the opposition, reaffirming the validity of the original thesis. Throughout, maintaining philosophical decorum, civility, and adherence to principles of charity and accuracy—introduced in the initial course materials—is crucial for an ethically sound and professionally credible discussion.

The concluding section should briefly reflect on the significance of the analysis, including how the essay contributes to understanding the broader controversy, highlights often overlooked issues or unpopular perspectives, or suggests directions for future inquiry. It should avoid merely summarizing the essay content or introducing new evidence, focusing instead on insights gained and implications for scholarly or practical engagement with the problem.

The overall length of the essay should be between 1500 and 1700 words, excluding cover pages and references. It must include proper APA citations and a detailed reference list comprised of reputable academic sources such as peer-reviewed journal articles, scholarly books, and authoritative online resources. The paper should be written in a clear, engaging, and scholarly style, optimized for SEO and accessible to a broad academic audience, with properly structured sections and rich, relevant citations throughout.

References

• Foster, H., Hardy, R., & Záºà±iga y Postigo, J. (2015). With good reason: A guide to critical thinking. Stanford University Press.
• Additional peer-reviewed journal articles, scholarly books, and reputable online resources cited appropriately.