Article Review Guidelines: A Common Misperception In Researc

Article Review Guidelinesa Common Misperception In Research Is That Al

A common misperception in research is that all published articles have merit, and findings should be taken as truth. The reality is that some articles get published despite poorly designed studies and/or erroneous conclusions. Part of your role as a young scientist-practitioner is to learn how to discern when a study is good and what conclusions you can glean from a study. This is especially germane in sports psychology, in which the rigor of empirical research is far behind other fields. The purpose of these article review assignments is to provide you with some general heuristics to help you critically consume scholarly research.

In this course, the three article reviews will build upon one another, with each subsequent review requiring more critical analysis and writing. You will pick a topic area in sports psychology that interests you. All three of your articles will be on your chosen topic, with the goal of the last article review assignment resulting in a brief scholarly research paper.

Article Review #1 requires you to watch the video “Understanding Statistics and Journal Articles in Research With Literature Reviews.” This video provides an overview of how to access, evaluate, understand, and summarize scholarly journal articles. After watching, choose one peer-reviewed article related to your topic area. In your review, describe in your own words the following sections of the article, as highlighted in the video:

  • Introduction
  • Method
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Parameters

Your assignment should be between 300 and 400 words and encapsulate all aspects as per the grading rubric. Ensure that you follow APA guidelines in your writing.

Paper For Above instruction

The critical evaluation of scholarly articles is an essential skill for young researchers and practitioners, especially within the domain of sports psychology. The article review assignment outlined herein aims to cultivate such skills by guiding students through the systematic analysis of peer-reviewed research. In particular, the first assignment focuses on understanding and articulating the core components of a scholarly article: the introduction, method, results, discussion, and parameters. Selecting an appropriate article, students can assess the rigor and relevance of research within sports psychology, fostering critical appraisal skills necessary for evidence-based practice.

Before engaging with an article, students are advised to view the instructional video “Understanding Statistics and Journal Articles in Research With Literature Reviews.” This resource provides a comprehensive overview of how to access scholarly articles, interpret statistical and methodological information, and summarize findings effectively. Equipped with this foundational knowledge, students are then tasked with choosing a peer-reviewed article related to their topic of interest in sports psychology. The selection process encourages the exploration of current research and facilitates exposure to diverse investigative approaches.

Once an article is selected, the student must critically analyze and describe its core sections. The introduction should be summarized to illustrate the research gap and the study's purpose. The method section needs to be explained, highlighting the study design, participants, procedures, and measures used. The results segment involves interpreting key findings, including statistical outcomes and significance levels. The discussion should be summarized to understand how the authors interpret their findings, relate them to existing literature, and acknowledge limitations. Lastly, the parameters—such as sample size, variables measured, and statistical thresholds—must be identified to assess the study’s scope and applicability.

Writing between 300 and 400 words, students should synthesize their understanding succinctly, demonstrating critical engagement with the article's content. Proper APA formatting is required to ensure academic integrity and clarity. This exercise not only enhances comprehension of research articles but also cultivates an analytical mindset that is essential for evaluating the literature critically. Ultimately, this foundational review prepares students for subsequent, more complex analyses in future assignments, culminating in a scholarly research paper that contributes to their developing expertise in sports psychology research methodology.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
  • Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications.
  • Gray, D. E. (2018). Doing research in the real world. Sage Publications.
  • Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2018). Practical research: Planning and design. Pearson.
  • Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage Publications.
  • Thompson, B. (2012).Sampling. In The ABCs of educational research (pp. 155-164). Routledge.
  • Wang, T., & Brown, T. (2020). Critically appraising research articles in sports science. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 9(2), 123-131.
  • Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
  • Zhang, D., et al. (2017). An overview of research methods in sports psychology. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 12(1), 5-15.

Related Assignments