As A Crime Scene Investigator, You Respond To A Homicide Sce

As A Crime Scene Investigator You Respond To A Homicide Scene At A Co

As a Crime Scene Investigator (CSI) called to a homicide scene at a convenience store and gas station, a meticulous forensic approach is essential to gather evidence pertinent to fingerprint analysis and overall scene processing. The scene, seized previously and secured by law enforcement officers, presents a complex environment with multiple items that could contain latent impressions vital for identifying the perpetrator or connecting the scene to the suspect(s) or victim. In this report, I analyze the specific items present at the scene for latent impression processing, detail the protocols to be employed, and discuss procedures to determine involvement or witness status of the people present. Additionally, I outline the appropriate evidence packaging procedures specific to fingerprint evidence, ensuring compliance with proper forensic standards.

Processing Scene Items for Latent Impressions

Among the eight items present at the scene, careful consideration must be given to their fixed or movable nature, as well as their potential to retain latent prints. The items are: the lottery ticket, the revolver, the cardboard carton, the crumpled map with directions, the six-pack container, the spent bullet, the spilled cigar box of bills, and the cigarette butt outside the store.

Fixed, Non-moveable Items and Processing Protocols

The primary fixed and non-moveable item is the wall behind the counter where the spent bullet is embedded. Since this surface is part of the structure, it cannot be moved without risking damage to potential latent prints or evidence. Latent impression processing here would involve non-invasive methods such as dusting with magnetic or fluorescent powders, allowing visual enhancement under UV light, or using superglue fuming if appropriate. These techniques would help visualize any latent prints on the wall or embedded bullet, providing valuable evidence connecting a suspect or witness to the scene.

The other non-moveable element is the store's counter itself. While some sections of the counter may be movable, the overall structure is fixed. Latent prints on the counter surface—such as on its top or sides—would be processed similarly with powders or chemical reagents compatible with surface materials. The process involves meticulous dusting, lifting, and preservation of prints on lifting tape or other suitable mediums.

Items to be Processed and Rationale

• Lottery Ticket: A paper item with a blood-like impression. Its surface is non-porous, making it suitable for dusting with fine aluminum or carbon powders. Latent prints on the ticket's surface can be lifted with tape and preserved for analysis.
• Revolver: The firearm has reddish-brown spots and fibers on its surface; it is movable. To process for fingerprints, the firearm should be carefully examined and dusted with soft powder (e.g., black powder) on accessible surfaces such as the grip, trigger, and barrel. The fibers and spots can be collected using tape lifts if visible, but the firearm itself is best processed on-site using non-abrasive dusting techniques to preserve prints.
• Cardboard Carton: Ripped open, possibly has latent prints on its surface. Processing involves dusting the surface with appropriate powders, and lifting prints onto tape for comparison.
• Map and Directions on Notebook Paper: Since paper has a porous nature, chemical processing like superglue fuming or small particle reagent (SPR) may be suitable, especially for latent prints not visible to the naked eye.
• Six-Pack Container of Bottles: Cardboard, may hold latent prints on its surface. The cardboard can be processed via dusting with fingerprint powder and lifted for examination.
• Spent Bullet Embedded in Wall: Typically not suitable for fingerprint processing; its primary evidentiary value relates to ballistic analysis rather than latent prints.
• Cigar Box of Bills: The spilled bills may contain latent prints if handled or touched. Processing involves dusting and lifting. However, the bills' porous nature might limit the effectiveness of chemical enhancement techniques.
• Cigarette Butt: Outside the store, the cigarette butt can harbor latent prints on its surface; due to its non-porous nature, fingerprint powder and tape lifting are appropriate.

Processing Protocols and Location

Each item would be processed on-site initially when possible, following standard protocols: dusting with appropriate powders, chemical enhancement methods (superglue fuming for non-porous surfaces, SPR, or ninhydrin for porous materials), and lifting with adhesive tape. Items like the revolver and cigarette butt might be taken to the forensic laboratory for further processing with advanced techniques, such as cyanoacrylate fuming or alternate light source examinations, to maximize evidence recovery. The lab environment ensures controlled conditions, reducing contamination risk and allowing meticulous analysis.

Determining Involvement or Witness Status

Establishing whether individuals present are involved in the homicide or are mere witnesses requires collecting information without conducting interrogations, as per boundaries set in the investigation. Visual observations of each individual’s behavior, interactions, and proximity to evidence can provide initial clues. For instance, employees might have handled or touched some items, leaving latent prints, and knowing who was present at the time is crucial. Surveillance footage, if available, can confirm identities and actions during the incident.

Interview strategies could include discreet questioning by detectives to ascertain roles, alibis, and timelines while I, as the CSI, focus on evidence collection and analysis. Cross-referencing fingerprints lifted from the scene with law enforcement databases or known profiles can establish the involvement of specific persons—either as suspects or witnesses. Witnesses or individuals with extensive contact with items like the gun or money are prioritized for fingerprint comparison.

Evidence Packaging for Latent Prints

All latent print evidence must be properly preserved to prevent contamination, degradation, or loss. Items such as the lottery ticket, cardboard carton, and paper documents should be placed in paper, unsealed evidence containers, such as paper envelopes or cardboards, to avoid moisture buildup. Items like the revolver—if lifted successfully for prints—should be wrapped in anti-static, padded containers or specimen bags designed for firearm evidence, with latent prints secured on adhesive tape in a paper carrier to prevent smudging. For porous items like paper, storage in a paper bag or envelope is appropriate. Items must be labeled with case numbers, date, location, and handler initials. Evidence submission forms should accompany each item to maintain chain of custody and facilitate laboratory analysis.

Conclusion

Processing at a homicide scene requires rigorous adherence to forensic protocols to maximize evidence recovery, particularly latent prints, which can be crucial in identifying perpetrators and linking suspects to the crime. Each item’s material characteristics inform the choice of processing techniques, and careful evidence handling ensures integrity and admissibility in court. Combining physical evidence analysis with observational and investigative strategies forms a comprehensive approach to solving the crime and upholding justice.

References

• Houck, M. M., & Siegel, J. A. (2015). Fundamentals of Forensic Science. Academic Press.
• Kirk, R. G., & Guynn, R. M. (2018). Forensic Science: An Introduction to Scientific and Investigative Techniques. CRC Press.
• Saferstein, R. (2011). Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Science. Pearson.
• Harries, A. (2020). Crime Scene Investigation and Evidence Collection. CRC Press.
• Pollard, A. M., & Tedeschi, J. S. (2018). Forensic Evidence: Science and the Law. CRC Press.
• Budowle, B., et al. (2017). Forensic DNA Evidence Collection, Preservation and Analysis. Elsevier.
• National Institute of Justice. (2010). Crime Scene Evidence Collection & Preservation. U.S. Department of Justice.
• Marshall, J., et al. (2022). Fingerprint Evidence: An Identification and Classification Overview. Wiley.
• Amorim, J., et al. (2019). The Role of Latent Prints in Modern Forensic Investigations. Forensic Science International.
• Fisher, B. A. J. (2009). Techniques of Crime Scene Investigation. CRC Press.