As Discussed In Chapter 3 Of Your Textbook There Are 095205
As Discussed In Chapter 3 Of Your Textbook There Are Many Different Se
As discussed in chapter 3 of your textbook there are many different sentencing models and just as many goals for imposing various sentences. Below are two scenarios. Scenario #1 Sam is a 40 year old who was convicted of a breaking into a jewelry store in Coral Gables, Florida. During the burglary he successfully took over $1 million dollars worth of jewelry. One month after the crime, Sam was arrested for the crimes of burglary and grand theft. All of the jewelry was successfully recovered and given back to the business owner. Sam was found guilty by a jury in your court room for burglary and grand theft. He has accepted responsibility for his actions. He has no previous criminal history.
Scenario #2 Jennifer was convicted of aggravated assault. Jennifer is an 18 year old who belonged to a local street gang. She was told by the gang leader to scare Ashley, a girlfriend of a rival gang member. One night while out at a night club Jennifer pulled a gun on Ashley to scare her. The gun went off and hit Ashley in the leg. Ashley was transported to the hospital and treated for a serious gun shot wound. She recovered after two months. Jennifer was arrested at the scene and charged with attempted murder. She was plead guilty to a lesser charge, aggravated assault in your court room. She has a few convictions for misdemeanors as a juvenile. Select one of the scenarios to discuss.
Do not add any facts to the scenario. Please answer the questions below based solely on the information you have. What type of sentencing model would you use to sentence the offenders? What actual sentence would you impose (type and time)? What are the "goals of sentencing" that are associated with your decision? Do not use current sentencing strategies to determine your sentence. You are to discuss what you think is appropriate, not what is already in place.
Paper For Above instruction
In choosing an appropriate sentencing model for Jennifer, the focus would be on a rehabilitative approach that aims to address her juvenile background, her gang affiliation, and the circumstances that led to her involvement in the aggravated assault. The rehabilitative model emphasizes transforming the offender’s behavior through education, counseling, and other supportive interventions, rather than solely punishing the offense. Given Jennifer's young age, her history of juvenile misdemeanors, and her involvement in gang activity, a rehabilitative approach aligns with the goal of reducing recidivism by addressing underlying issues such as youth delinquency, peer pressure, and lack of positive social support.
In terms of the actual sentence, I would propose a structured period of community-based supervision combined with targeted rehabilitative programs. Specifically, I would recommend a sentence of probation for three years, during which Jennifer would participate in anger management,gang intervention programs, and vocational training. Additionally, a period of house arrest with electronic monitoring would serve to ensure compliance with the terms of probation while allowing her to maintain connections with her support system. This approach facilitates accountability, provides her with opportunities for personal development, and reduces the negative impacts of incarceration on a juvenile’s future prospects.
The goals of sentencing in this context are primarily rehabilitation, deterrence, and community safety. Rehabilitation aims to reform Jennifer's behavior and integrate her as a positive member of society. Deterrence serves both specific and general purposes: deterring Jennifer from future violent acts and discouraging similar behavior among peers. Protecting the community remains a key concern, especially considering her involvement with a gang and the seriousness of gun violence. The rehabilitative and community-focused sentencing model seeks to balance these goals by promoting positive behavioral change while safeguarding societal interests. It also recognizes the importance of addressing the social and psychological factors that contributed to her actions, rather than solely punishing the offense, adhering to a more humane and constructive justice approach.
References
- Clear, T. (2016). Imprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Worse. Oxford University Press.
Coercion, Capital, and the Welfare State: The Politics of Criminal Justice. University of Chicago Press. Rehabilitation in Criminal Justice. Routledge. Understanding Youth Violence: Probation, Prevention, and Policy. Routledge. Juvenile Justice: An Introduction. Sage Publications. The Juvenile Court and the Politics of Juvenile Justice. Routledge. Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2019 National Report. Office of Justice Programs. The Changing Borders of Juvenile Justice: Transfer and Beyond. Oxford University Press.