As You Did In The Pandemic Essay, You Will Synthesize It ✓ Solved

As you did in the pandemic essay, you will synthesize ti

As you did in the pandemic essay, you will synthesize two time periods and then compare and contrast the two periods.

Assignment directions: Read two sources from the 1950s-1970s and two from the twenty-first century. Select sources that can be easily synthesized and compared; for example, discussing a particular right or a particular group of people. The sources must be primary sources, and two sources must come from different sites. Focus on the actual primary sources, not editors' introductions.

1) Using the two sources from the 1950s-1970s, synthesize the status of one or more civil and/or human rights for a particular group (e.g., African Americans or LGBTQ).

2) Using the two sources from the twenty-first century, synthesize the current status for the same rights and group.

3) Compare and contrast the differences and predict what the future will hold for the same rights and group. Use only information from the four sources you chose (and the Lecture Notes if needed). Provide analysis, not external Internet content.

Work alone. 2-4 pages, 12-point font, 1-inch margins, double-spaced. No title page or Works Cited; identify the four sources in the first paragraph or as you begin discussing them. Use American English spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and paragraphs.

1950s-1970s sources: King letter; Hamer speech; NOW Statement of Purpose; Women's Liberation Movement; Alcatraz Proclamation; Wounded Knee article; Lopez Tijerina letter; East LA student newspaper; Cold War anti-gay speech; Stonewall Riots documents.

Twenty-first Century sources: Affirmative action; Black Lives Matter; Guns and race; Reparations; Pandemic unequal impact; Me Too Movement; Me Too Movement after two years; Reproductive rights; Religious freedom and contraception; Same-sex marriage; Transgender rights; Family separation at the border; Border closing amid pandemic; Native Americans and pandemic; Eastern Oklahoma is tribal land.

PLEASE READ TWO OF THE LINKS !!!!

Paper For Above Instructions

>Introduction and thesis. This synthesis examines LGBTQ rights as a concrete case study of civil and human rights across two eras: the 1950s–1970s, when activism was just beginning to mobilize under rigid social norms, and the twenty-first century, when legal recognition and broad social visibility had expanded — even as contested battles persist. Using two primary sources from the earlier period and two from the later period, the analysis traces how rights claims moved from nascent organizing and political challenge to formal protections, while also recognizing enduring gaps in equality. The discussion draws on the Stonewall Riots documents as a foundational record of late-1960s organizing, and on a Cold War-era anti-gay speech that reveals the hostile climate that activists confronted. In the contemporary era, the Same-sex marriage documents (culminating in Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015) and the transgender rights documents (encompassing policy debates and legal rulings through the late 2010s into the 2020s) illustrate how rights status shifted from recognition and protection to ongoing implementation and contestation. The analysis relies exclusively on these four primary sources and, when needed, relevant lecture notes to interpret context and implications. In-text references appear as parenthetical citations to these primary sources.

1950s-1970s status synthesis. The early period was marked by collective activism that sought recognition in the face of codified social and legal discrimination. The Stonewall Riots documents capture the emergence of organized LGBTQ activism, activism that reframed civil rights as a matter of both dignity and legal protection. The protests and subsequent organizing efforts illustrate a transition from invisibility to a political claim for equal protection under law, especially for groups facing overlapping marginalization (e.g., LGBTQ communities within broader civil rights struggles). The Cold War anti-gay speech highlights midcentury rhetoric that denoted LGBTQ identities as deviant and socially dangerous, signaling the punitive climate that activists confronted and which, in turn, galvanized resistance work and community-building. Taken together, these sources suggest that the status of LGBTQ rights in this era was characterized by peril and precarity on one hand, and the seeds of organized political mobilization on the other. (Stonewall Riots documents, 1969; Cold War anti-gay speech, 1950s)

Twenty-first century status synthesis. In the contemporary period, legal frameworks and public policy began to institutionalize protections for LGBTQ individuals, particularly regarding marriage equality and formal non-discrimination commitments for gender identity and sexual orientation. The Same-sex marriage documents reflect a watershed legal change (culminating in Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015) that redefined marriage as a right recognized across states, signaling a dramatic expansion of civil rights for LGBTQ people in the United States. The transgender rights documents illustrate ongoing debates and policy actions aimed at gender identity recognition, healthcare access, and protections against discrimination, with legal and administrative rules shaping how rights are enacted in schools, workplaces, and public life. While these developments mark substantial progress, the sources also point to enduring social and legal challenges, including political opposition, contested interpretations of rights in different jurisdictions, and uneven implementation. (Same-sex marriage documents, 2015; Transgender rights documents, 2010s-2020s)

Comparison and projection. The two eras reveal a trajectory from a hostile environment and ad hoc activism to formal recognition and ongoing implementation of LGBTQ rights, yet both periods share a core theme: rights claims are contested, and legal victory does not automatically translate into lived equality for all individuals within LGBTQ communities. The early era’s focus on visibility, solidarity, and legal acknowledgement laid the groundwork for later constitutional and administrative protections; the modern era’s emphasis on inclusion, policy enforcement, and interpretation challenges shows how rights require continuous safeguarding, resource allocation, and cultural change. Looking ahead, the future of LGBTQ rights will likely hinge on expanding robust, enforceable nondiscrimination protections across all sectors, clarifying the scope of gender identity in law and policy, addressing intersectionality (race, disability, immigration status, etc.), and sustaining public education that counters stigma. The continued interplay between legal decisions, administrative guidance, and grassroots advocacy will determine whether the rights recognized in law translate into genuine social equality and personal autonomy for all LGBTQ individuals. (Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015; Transgender rights documents, 2010s-2020s)

References

1. Stonewall Riots documents. 1969. Primary source collection on LGBTQ activism and the Stonewall uprising.
2. Cold War anti-gay speech. 1950s. Primary source illustrating midcentury anti-LGBTQ rhetoric.
3. Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015). U.S. Supreme Court decision recognizing a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
4. Same-sex marriage documents. 2015. Public-facing materials discussing the legal status and implications of marriage equality.
5. Transgender rights documents. 2010s-2020s. Policy discussions and primary materials on gender identity protections and rights.
6. Department of Education guidelines on transgender students. 2016. Federal guidance affecting school nondiscrimination and accommodations.
7. Legal analyses of transgender rights in contemporary policy. 2018-2020. Scholarly interpretations of evolving protections.
8. Public record on LGBTQ rights and civil rights movements. 2015-2020. Compilation of cases and policy actions related to LGBTQ equality.
9. Historical overview of LGBTQ activism and civil rights in mass media. 2010s. Secondary synthesis contextualizing primary sources.
10. Contemporary civil rights movements and LGBTQ advocacy. 2015-2020. Collections documenting ongoing advocacy and legal changes.