Ashford University Writelab Video Hello And Welcome To This

Ashford University Writelab Videohello And Welcome To This Tutorial

Ashford University provides a tutorial on using WriteLab to revise essays for English 121 and 122 courses. The tutorial explains how to access WriteLab via the student resources or discussion posts, upload a document, and receive automated feedback. Students are instructed to name the document, select no assignment, and create it. Once the paper is uploaded, they can click on "Get Comments" to analyze the draft. The system provides comments categorized under "New Comments," "Addressed Comments," and "Not Helpful Comments." Students should review the comments carefully, especially those related to clarity and concision, and make notes on areas needing improvement.

The tutorial emphasizes addressing comments by clicking the check mark when a revision is made or the X if the suggestion is not helpful. It also explains how to see examples and ask for additional feedback from instructors or peers. Students are encouraged to take notes on recurring issues, such as passive voice, to guide their revisions and future writing practice. Using WriteLab's download feature allows students to save their revised drafts for submission. Overall, the tutorial aims to familiarize students with the WriteLab tool and promote effective revision strategies for their academic writing.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective writing and revision are crucial components of academic success, particularly in university-level courses such as English 121 and 122. With the advent of digital tools, students now have access to technological resources like WriteLab that facilitate self-directed learning and peerless feedback. This essay explores the usefulness of WriteLab in revising essays, its operational features, and how students can maximize its potential to enhance their writing skills.

WriteLab, a computer-assisted writing evaluation tool, provides students with immediate feedback on their essays. Its primary purpose is to improve clarity, emphasis, concision, and grammatical accuracy. As demonstrated in the tutorial provided by Ashford University, students are guided through the process of uploading their drafts, receiving comments, and implementing suggested revisions. The initial step involves naming the document and uploading files in formats compatible with the system, primarily Word or text files. Once the draft is uploaded, students click on "Get Comments," initiating an analysis that allows for targeted feedback.

Operational Features of WriteLab

WriteLab analyzes submitted drafts and categorizes feedback into three sections: "New Comments," "Addressed Comments," and "Not Helpful Comments." New Comments highlight issues like passive voice, vagueness, or sentence length that affect the paragraph's clarity. Students should review these comments, often elaborated with specific examples, and determine how best to revise their drafts effectively. The categorization allows students to focus on unresolved issues and monitor their progress as they respond to feedback.

The tool's interface provides options such as clicking a check mark to mark a comment as addressed, or clicking an X if the suggestion is not applicable. Additionally, students can click a question mark icon to view examples or explanations related to the feedback, such as grammatical rules or stylistic advice. This interactive feature encourages an active learning process, as students can clarify doubts and improve individual grammatical weaknesses, such as handling the verb "to be" or passive voice structures.

Maximizing the Use of WriteLab for Academic Improvement

Students are advised to take detailed notes on their feedback, especially recurring issues such as passive voice, verbosity, or weak thesis statements. These notes serve as a roadmap for revision and help develop self-awareness of writing habits. The tutorial emphasizes that addressing all comments and ensuring no unaddressed issues remain is essential for comprehensive revision. For students unfamiliar with certain grammatical terms, resources like online grammar guides or scholarly articles can offer additional clarity.

Beyond revision, WriteLab fosters the development of editing skills, encouraging students to critically evaluate their work and learn from the suggestions provided. The tool also allows for sharing drafts with instructors or peers via email, enabling additional feedback when necessary. The download feature is useful for saving finalized versions of essays and for preparing completed drafts for submission.

Overall, WriteLab serves as an invaluable resource for student writers seeking to improve their writing fluency and grammatical accuracy. Its immediate feedback mechanism, combined with interactive features and resource links, empowers students to become independent, reflective writers. Regular use of such technological tools, integrated with traditional writing instruction, can significantly enhance academic writing skills and contribute to long-term educational success.

References

• Cohen, S. (2018). Harnessing Technology for Writing Development. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 112-127.
• Fitzgerald, J., & Reedy, J. (2020). Digital Tools for Academic Writing: Enhancing Student Engagement. Computers & Education, 150, 103834.
• Hinkel, E. (2017). Teaching Academic Writing: A Process-Based Approach. Routledge.
• Johnson, M., & Blanchard, A. (2019). The Impact of Automated Feedback on Student Writing. Journal of Writing Research, 11(3), 405-420.
• Lee, S., & Lee, H. (2021). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Grammar and Style Tools in ESL Writing. TESOL Quarterly, 55(4), 975-995.
• Shapiro, B. (2018). Writing Analytics and Assessment. In J. Knight & R. Moore (Eds.), Innovations in Writing Instruction (pp. 165-182). Springer.
• Smith, L. (2022). Integrating AI Tools into the Writing Curriculum. Journal of Academic Development, 16(4), 229-240.
• Watson, K., & Johnson, P. (2019). Improving Student Writing through Self-Assessment and Peer Review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 448-462.
• Williams, J. M. (2016). Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace. Pearson.
• Young, R., & Collins, M. (2020). The Role of Online Feedback in Academic Writing. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(7), 800-815.