Assessment And Revised Office Memo On Cleaning

Assessment and Improved Revision of Office Memo on Cleaning

The original memo, authored by Albertina Sindaha, Operations Manager, is intended to address staff responsibilities regarding cleanliness in the workplace. However, it suffers from issues related to tone, clarity, and professionalism. The tone comes across as exasperated and somewhat confrontational, which may create defensiveness or resentment among staff, hindering the message's effectiveness. Furthermore, the memo's structure is abrupt and disorganized, making it difficult for readers to quickly grasp expectations and actions required.

Several barriers could impede successful communication of the memo's core message. First, the negative tone may alienate employees, reducing motivation to comply. Second, the lack of explicit positive reinforcement or recognition of prior efforts might reduce engagement. Third, inconsistent emphasis on responsibilities versus consequences could generate confusion or resistance. Lastly, the memo does not specify clear, actionable steps or provide a schedule for accountability, which could lead to non-compliance or procrastination.

To enhance effectiveness, the revised memo should employ a tone that is respectful, motivating, and clear, while firmly outlining expectations and consequences. It should structure the information logically—beginning with appreciation for cooperation, followed by specific tasks, deadlines, and support options. By promoting a collaborative approach and maintaining professional language, management can foster a more positive environment conducive to compliance and accountability.

Paper For Above instruction

The initial memo from Albertina Sindaha demonstrates a common challenge in workplace communication: balancing assertiveness with professionalism. While the directive aims to address the issue of cleanliness, the tone inadvertently undermines the message's potential effectiveness. Analyzing the memo’s tone reveals that it is laced with frustration and mild threats (“if you can't do a better job... I will have to make a cleaning schedule”), which can be perceived as intimidating or demotivating rather than encouraging. Such language risks creating an adversarial atmosphere, reducing employees' willingness to cooperate voluntarily and fostering resentment instead of shared responsibility.

Effective communication in workplace management requires words that motivate, clarify, and foster cooperation. The tone must be respectful yet firm, emphasizing collective responsibility rather than assigning blame. Moreover, clear instructions are essential to prevent ambiguity, with specific expectations, deadlines, and available resources outlined explicitly. For instance, instead of a vague call to action like “do something about the counters,” a more structured approach would specify which tasks should be completed and by when.

A primary barrier to successful communication in the original memo is the lack of positive reinforcement. Employees are more likely to heed requests if their efforts are acknowledged or incentivized. The memo also overlooks potential support mechanisms such as providing cleaning supplies or scheduling mini-team cleaning sessions, which could make the responsibility seem less burdensome.

Improvements can be achieved by adopting a more constructive and organized approach. The revised memo begins by appreciating staff's efforts and emphasizing shared goals, then explicitly lists tasks with clear deadlines. It encourages teamwork and offers support, such as reminding staff of the availability of cleaning supplies and suggesting flexible schedules if needed. Lastly, it concludes with a polite reminder of the importance of maintaining a clean workplace for everyone’s comfort and safety, coupled with the understanding that cooperation is a collective effort.

For example, the revised memo might state: “Dear Team, I appreciate your ongoing efforts to keep our office clean. To maintain a pleasant work environment, I’d like to kindly remind everyone of the upcoming cleaning responsibilities this Friday. Please ensure that the copy machine area is tidy, with waste baskets emptied and supplies organized. Additionally, the lunchroom should be cleaned, including counters, refrigerator, sinks, and coffee machines. Food items left in the refrigerator by Friday afternoon should be discarded if not claimed, as expired food can cause unpleasant odors. The office supply shelves should also be organized. Let's work together to complete these tasks by end of day, and please don’t hesitate to reach out if you need supplies or assistance. Maintaining cleanliness benefits us all and contributes to a positive workplace atmosphere. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.”

References

• Guffey, M. E., & Loewy, D. (2018). Business Communications: Process and Product (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Technique Talk: The Politics and Ethics of Representation in Qualitative Research. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 276-290.
• Rosenberg, L. (2020). Workplace Communication: Building Relationships, Managing Conflicts. Routledge.
• Reynolds, S. (2019). The Power of Positive Communication in Business. Harvard Business Review, 97(4), 48-55.
• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
• Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2018). Interpersonal Communication Competence. SAGE Publications.
• Thill, J. V., & Bovee, C. L. (2019). Excellence in Business Communication (9th ed.). Pearson.
• Nelson, T. (2017). Communicating in the Workplace: Strategies for Success. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Hargie, O. (2016). Skilled Interpersonal Communication: Research, Theory and Practice. Routledge.
• Anderson, P. F., & Nishiguchi, T. (2021). Leadership and Organizational Effectiveness. Journal of Business Research, 130, 123-132.