Assessment Tasks 1: Literature Review Value 40 Length
Assessment Tasksassessment 1 Literature Reviewvalue 40length 1500
Assessment Tasksassessment 1 Literature Reviewvalue 40length 1500
ASSESSMENT TASKS Assessment 1: Literature Review Value: 40% Length: 1500 words + reference list Format: Double-line spacing, size 12 font single sided, black and white print. Reference Style: Harvard Business Requirements: -editting of the softcopy work that is done. Especially those highlighted parts that are directly copied down frim the internet. Please help me to repharse it in your own words.
Paper For Above instruction
This assignment requires preparing a comprehensive literature review that critically examines existing scholarly works related to a specific topic within your field of study. The review should systematically analyze, synthesize, and evaluate previous research findings, theories, and debates to establish a clear understanding of the current state of knowledge on the chosen subject. The purpose is to identify gaps, contradictions, and areas for future research, while demonstrating your ability to interpret and engage with academic literature critically.
The literature review should be approximately 1500 words in length, excluding references, and adhere to the formatting guidelines specified: double-line spacing, 12-point font size, printed single-sided on white paper. Proper citation and referencing must follow the Harvard Business style to ensure academic integrity and consistency. A well-organized structure with logical flow throughout the review is essential, beginning with an introduction that outlines the scope and objectives, followed by thematic or chronological analysis of the sources, and concluding with a synthesis of key findings and implications for further research.
An important aspect of this assignment involves editing the submitted soft copy. This includes refining the writing for clarity, coherence, and academic rigor, with particular attention to the sections where content has been directly copied or paraphrased from online sources. These highlighted parts should be thoroughly rephrased in your own words to eliminate plagiarism and demonstrate genuine engagement with the material.
In summary, your submission should reflect critical thinking, analytical insights, and meticulous editing, ensuring the final work is polished, well-structured, and academically sound in accordance with the Harvard referencing style.
References
- Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. Sage Publications.
- Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson.
- Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2016). The craft of research. University of Chicago Press.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
- Ridley, D. (2012). The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students. Sage Publications.
- Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the research imagination. Sage Publications.
- Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii.
- Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2016). The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success. Corwin Press.
- Galvan, J. L. (2017). Writing Literature Reviews. Routledge.
- Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing.