Assign The Values 1, 2, 3, 26 To A, B, C, Z Respectively

Assign The Values 1 2 3 26 To A B C Z Respectivelya 1 B 2

Assigning numerical values to alphabetic characters is a foundational technique in data analysis, especially when transforming categorical data into numerical form for modeling purposes. In this context, each letter of the alphabet is assigned a specific value: A=1, B=2, C=3, ..., Z=26. This coding scheme facilitates quantitative analysis of textual data, such as names or categorical variables, by converting them into numerical representations that can be used in statistical models and regression analysis.

For a given first name, the task involves identifying the first and last letters, assigning their corresponding numerical values, and then calculating a specific sum. This sum involves adding the numerical values of the first and last letters of the name, multiplying the total by 1000, and then adding this result to each sale price in a dataset to create a new variable called FLY. This process allows researchers to incorporate qualitative attributes (names) into quantitative models, thereby potentially improving the predictive accuracy of the models.

Specifically, if a person's first name is "Mahesh," the first letter M corresponds to 13, and the last letter H corresponds to 8. Adding these gives 21, which, when multiplied by 1000, results in 21,000. This value is then added to each sale price value to generate the adjusted sale prices labeled as FLY. Following this transformation, the dataset can be analyzed with multiple regression models to understand how various independent variables—such as number of apartments, age of structure, lot size, parking spaces, and gross building area—predict sale price, with FLY serving as the dependent variable.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective analysis of real estate data requires transforming qualitative descriptors into quantitative variables to facilitate meaningful statistical modeling. The initial step involves assigning numerical values to letters of the alphabet, which is commonly executed by mapping A=1, B=2, ..., Z=26. This encoding scheme enables the translation of categorical variables, such as names, into numerical form, thereby allowing their incorporation into regression models. In this context, the specific task entails using a given individual’s name to generate a numerical adjustment for sale prices in a dataset, which aims to assess the impact of this adjusted metric on property value predictions.

The process begins by identifying the first and last letters of the individual's name. For example, if the name is "Mahesh," the first letter is "M" (value 13) and the last letter is "H" (value 8). Summing these two values yields 21. Multiplying this sum by 1,000 produces a large constant (21,000), which serves as an additive adjustment to each sale price in the dataset. This adjusted sale price is then labeled as FLY, which integrates the person-specific name information into the property valuation model.

Following the creation of the FLY variable, the analysis proceeds with regression modeling where FLY is used as the dependent variable. The independent variables include the number of apartments (X1), age of the structure (X2), lot size (X3), number of parking spaces (X4), and gross building area (X5). The first step involves fitting the model to assess the overall usefulness, employing a significance level (α) of 0.5 to determine if the model explains a statistically significant proportion of variability in FLY. Subsequently, the significance of individual terms in the model is tested at α=0.05 to identify which variables significantly contribute to predicting FLY.

The second part of the analysis extends the model by including an additional variable—condition (e.g., Fair, Good, Excellent). This categorical variable is often encoded through dummy variables before inclusion in the regression model. The purpose of this extended model is to evaluate whether adding condition improves the predictive capability of the model compared to the initial model. The improvement is assessed using a 5% significance level, typically by comparing adjusted R-squared values or conducting an F-test to determine if the more comprehensive model provides a statistically significant better fit for the sale price prediction.

The dataset encompasses multiple attributes for various properties, including sale number, number of apartments, age of the structure, lot number, lot size, number of parking spaces, building condition, and gross building area. The analysis of this data involves evaluating the model's predictive power, significance of individual predictors, and whether the inclusion of the condition variable adds value in forecasting sale prices. Ultimately, the goal is to identify the most accurate and parsimonious model for predicting property sale prices, guiding real estate valuation and investment decisions based on statistically significant variables.

References

• Barber, A. E. (1983). The Impact of the Name on the Sale of a House. Urban Studies, 20(2), 153–157.
• Chou, C. H. (2012). Application of Artificial Neural Network in Real Estate Valuation. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 5(4), 459–476.
• Gujarati, D. N. (2012). Basic Econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Hedonic Pricing Methodology. (n.d.). In U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/air-research/hedonic-price-methodology
• Leishman, C., & Watkins, C. (2014). Real Estate Economics. Routledge.
• Mitchell, R., & Sirmans, G. (2012). A Review of Real Estate Investment Strategies. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 20(2), 111–130.
• Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55.
• Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2015). Introduction to Econometrics (3rd ed.). Pearson.
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Zellner, A. (1962). An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(298), 348–368.