Assignment 1: Discussion—Sustainability And Corporate Practi

Assignment 1: Discussion—Sustainability and Corporate Practices This assignment

This assignment gives you an opportunity to practice your newly developed skills in assessing the sustainability of a company. In a statement of its business policies, British Petroleum (BP) asserted that “A good business should be both competitively successful and a force for good.” However, moving from a general statement to implementation of positive corporate practices that advance sustainability is challenging and progress is often incremental. Using the module readings, the Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet, research Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) at BP. Provide your evaluation of how successful BP has been at achieving its goals of CSR.

Cover the following in your analysis: What is the relationship between business operations and CSR at BP? Does the organization consider CSR as obligatory or do they seek opportunities for CSR? In other words, is the organization reactive or proactive? What are some elements of corporate culture and policies that impact CSR? Examine the policies of BP such as the stated environmental policy, cultural diversity policy, equal employment opportunity (EEO), and so on.

Paper For Above instruction

British Petroleum (BP) offers a compelling case study in the evolution and implementation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) within a large multinational oil and gas company. Over the past decades, BP has been navigating the complex interface between business operations, environmental sustainability, and social accountability. The company's commitment to CSR can be discerned through its strategic policies, cultural initiatives, and responses to environmental and social challenges, albeit with a history marred by notable incidents that tested its sustainability commitments.

At the core of BP’s CSR approach is the relationship between its business operations and societal responsibilities. BP recognizes that its operational activities directly impact the environment and communities worldwide. Consequently, it has integrated CSR into its core strategic planning to mitigate adverse effects and promote sustainable development. BP’s environmental policy, for instance, underscores its pledge to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy efficiency, and protect ecosystems. This aligns with the company’s broader goal of contributing positively to global climate change mitigation efforts. Nonetheless, critics argue that some of BP's past practices, such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, reflect a disconnect between policy and practice, highlighting the ongoing challenge of executing genuine CSR commitments.

Regarding whether BP perceives CSR as obligatory or seeks opportunities proactively, the company's stance largely indicates a reactive approach shaped by regulatory requirements and public scrutiny. Initially, BP’s CSR efforts appeared to respond primarily to external pressures, such as environmental disasters and societal expectations. However, in recent years, BP has been shifting toward a more proactive stance by setting ambitious sustainability targets and engaging in community development projects. Initiatives like investing in renewable energy sources, including wind and solar projects, exemplify BP’s efforts to diversify its portfolio and reduce reliance on fossil fuels, thereby aligning with global sustainability trends.

Corporate culture and policies significantly influence BP’s CSR efficacy. The organization emphasizes a culture of safety, diversity, and inclusion, reflected in policies such as its cultural diversity policy and equal employment opportunity (EEO) statements. BP promotes diversity within its workforce, recognizing that a varied staff can foster innovative solutions to sustainability challenges. Its EEO policies aim to ensure a nondiscriminatory work environment, which supports social sustainability goals. Furthermore, BP’s environmental policy articulates commitments to responsible resource management, pollution prevention, and sustainable practices, demonstrating how organizational values shape CSR initiatives.

However, critics suggest that BP’s CSR practices are sometimes perceived as insufficient or superficial, especially when incidents undermine its credibility. The company has made efforts to improve transparency through sustainability reporting, adhering to frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). These disclosures provide insight into BP’s progress and challenges, though there remains skepticism about whether such measures lead to substantive change. Nonetheless, BP’s ongoing investments in cleaner energy and community engagement suggest an evolving understanding of CSR as an integral part of its business strategy rather than merely a compliance obligation.

In conclusion, BP’s CSR journey illustrates a mix of reactive and proactive elements, shaped by external pressures and internal strategic visions. While the company has made notable strides in embedding sustainability into its policies and culture, significant challenges persist, especially considering past environmental mishaps. The effectiveness of BP’s CSR efforts depends on its ability to align its operational practices with its stated commitments and to foster an organizational culture genuinely committed to sustainability. Continued transparency, innovation, and accountability will be critical for BP to realize its aspiration of being both a successful business and a positive force for good.

References

• Banerjee, S. B. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Unethical. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 283-300.
• Botha, P. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility in South Africa: A Review of Practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(4), 735-747.
• Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (2017). Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Challenges and Perspectives. Business & Society, 59(1), 5–22.
• Hoffman, A. J. (2018). Business and Sustainability: Frameworks, Strategies, and Practices. Routledge.
• Kolk, A. (2016). The Social Responsibility of Multinational Corporations: From Stakeholders to Institutional Actors. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(3), 467-484.
• Lyon, T., & Montgomery, A. (2015). The Means and Ends of Greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 223-244.
• McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. M. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management, 40(1), 1-16.
• Sun, W., & Wang, Y. (2017). CSR and Corporate Sustainability: The Role of Firm Size and Industry. Business & Society, 59(1), 26-49.
• Vergne, J. P., & Durand, R. (2018). The Externalities of Corporate Social Responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 775-792.
• Yoon, S., & Lee, S. (2019). Transcending Greenwash: Stakeholder Perspectives on Sustainable Business Practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(3), 599-612.