Assignment 1: Law Of Demand—States That The

Assignment 1 Law Of Demandthe Law Of Demand States That The Demand Fo

The Law of Demand states that the demand for a product is inversely related to the price of such product. Therefore, the demand for a product is considered downward sloping. This implies that quantity demanded increases when price decreases. Is this always true? In your answer, provide at least three examples of products for which quantity demanded remains unchanged regardless of a change in price. Also, provide at least three examples of products for which quantity demanded increases in response to an increase in price. Also, include a discussion of the factors of demand that may account for such examples and justify your conclusions.

Paper For Above instruction

The law of demand, a fundamental principle in economics, asserts that, ceteris paribus, there is an inverse relationship between the price of a good and the quantity demanded by consumers. This phenomenon is typically represented by a downward-sloping demand curve, indicating that as prices fall, consumers tend to purchase more of the good, and vice versa. However, this relationship does not always hold universally across all products and scenarios. This essay explores cases where the demand may remain unaffected by price changes and where demand can paradoxically increase as prices rise, analyzing the underlying factors influencing such behaviors.

Examples of Products with Demand Unaffected by Price Changes

Firstly, a notable example includes essential medications such as life-saving drugs. For critically ill patients, the demand for vital pharmaceuticals remains relatively constant regardless of price fluctuations because substitutes are unavailable, and the need is urgent. For example, insulin for diabetics must be purchased regardless of price, which renders demand inelastic.

Secondly, some addictive goods like cigarettes or certain recreational drugs also exhibit demand that remains relatively stable across price changes. Many consumers addicted to such substances continue their consumption despite price hikes due to dependency, thereby making demand inelastic in the short term.

Third, luxury or status-symbol items such as high-end designer handbags often show demand that does not significantly decline with price increases. For affluent buyers, demand for such goods is driven more by status, prestige, or brand loyalty than by price, making their demand fairly inelastic within the upper income brackets.

These examples demonstrate scenarios where demand remains largely unchanged in response to price variations, mainly due to the critical, addictive, or status-related nature of the products involved.

Examples of Products with Demand Increasing as Price Rises

Conversely, some products exhibit a phenomenon known as the Giffen effect, where demand increases as prices rise, defying the basic law of demand. An example could be specific staple foods in impoverished communities, such as potatoes or rice, where a price increase may lead to higher demand because households allocate more of their limited income to these essential items, or because the perceived quality or status is associated with higher prices.

Another case includes Veblen goods, luxury items such as designer watches or high-status automobiles, where higher prices may enhance the item's prestige. Consumers might perceive higher prices as a sign of exclusivity and quality, which can motivate increased demand. For instance, a limited edition luxury watch's desirability may grow with its price, reinforcing its status symbol.

Similarly, certain collectibles or art pieces demonstrate increased demand as prices rise because their higher valuation boosts their desirability among collectors or investors, driven by the perception of scarcity and prestige associated with expensive artworks.

The demand for these items increases due to factors such as perceived prestige, social status, or inelastic supply, which can reverse the typical demand-price relationship.

Factors Influencing Demand Behavior

The divergence from the traditional law of demand can be attributed to various demand factors. Inelastic demand is often driven by necessity, addiction, or lack of substitutes, which makes consumers less responsive to price changes. For essential medicines and addictive goods, consumers have no feasible alternative, rendering their demand insensitive to price variations.

In the case of Veblen goods and luxury items, demand is influenced heavily by social and psychological factors. The perception that higher prices signify better quality or status increases demand among certain consumer segments. The concept of conspicuous consumption, introduced by Thorstein Veblen, emphasizes that individuals may buy more expensive items to display wealth, thereby increasing demand with rising prices.

Moreover, certain market conditions such as limited supply, high brand loyalty, and consumer perception of quality can also explain why demand for some products does not follow the typical downward-sloping curve.

In conclusion, while the law of demand holds broadly across most goods and markets, exceptions exist due to product nature, consumer behavior, and social factors. Recognizing these cases is crucial for accurate economic analysis and effective marketing strategies.

References

• Baumol, W. J., & Blinder, A. S. (2015). Economics: Principles and Policy. Cengage Learning.
• Perloff, J. M. (2017). Microeconomics: Principles and Policy. Pearson.
• Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class. Macmillan.
• Frank, R., & Bernanke, B. (2007). Principles of Economics. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Krugman, P., & Wells, R. (2018). Microeconomics. Worth Publishers.
• Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics. Macmillan.
• Hirschman, A. O. (1945). National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. University of California Press.
• Lebergott, S. (1950). The Demand for Fuel and Motor Oil in World War II. Economica.
• Varian, H. R. (2014). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach. W.W. Norton & Company.
• Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan.