Assignment 11: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay Part I Pr 390785

Assignment 11 Conflicting Viewpoints Essay Part I Prewriting Due

Assignment 11 Conflicting Viewpoints Essay Part I Prewriting Due

Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay - Part I Prewriting Due Week 2 and worth 30 points When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking by playing the "Believing Game." The Believing Game is about making the effort to "believe" - or at least consider - the reasons for an opposing view on an issue. The assignment is divided into two (2) parts. In Part I of the assignment (due Week 2), you will first read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes: "The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful" at Next, you will review the Procon.org Website in order to gather information.

Then, you will engage in prewriting to examine your thoughts. Note: In Part II of the assignment (due Week 4), you will write an essay geared towards synthesizing your ideas. Part I - Prewriting: Follow the instructions below for this prewriting activity. Use complete sentences and adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling. 1.

Select one (1) of the approved topics from the Website and state your position on the issue. 2. From the Procon.org Website, identify three (3) premises (reasons) listed under either the Pro or Con section - whichever section opposes your position. 3.For each of the three (3) premises (reasons) that oppose your position on the issue, answer these "believing" questions suggested by Elbow: a.What's interesting or helpful about this view? b.What would I notice if I believed this view? c.In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?" The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing: •Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph. •Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences. •Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: •Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA Style format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. •Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student's name, the professor's name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires the development of a prewriting activity focused on engaging with conflicting viewpoints about a societal issue, using critical thinking strategies outlined in the concept of the "Believing Game." The first part involves selecting an issue from a provided website—Procon.org—and stating one's position on that issue. Subsequently, the student must examine strong, opposing premises from the con side of that issue, for three reasons supporting their opposition. Critical reflection on each premise involves answering three questions: what is interesting or helpful about this view, what would be noticeable if one believed this view, and under what conditions might this view be true. The process aims to foster open-minded engagement, understanding alternate perspectives, and preparing for a synthesized argument in a subsequent essay. The activity must include an introduction, body paragraphs addressing each premise with supporting details, and a conclusion, with proper adherence to English writing conventions. Formatting must include a cover page, double-spacing, Times New Roman size 12 font, and APA citations and references. The goal is to deepen understanding of both sides of an issue through thoughtful analysis, preparing for future writing that integrates multiple viewpoints.

References

  • Elbow, P. (2013). Vibration, volume 1: Essays. Oxford University Press.
  • Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts & Tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
  • Procon.org. (2023). [Select the specific URL of the issue chosen for reference].
  • Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2012). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life. Pearson.
  • Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.
  • Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Harvard University Press.
  • Facione, N. C. (2013). Think Critically. Pearson Education.
  • Mitchell, M. (2011). Critical Thinking (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Beyer, B. (2014). Critical Thinking. The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
  • Norris, S. (2015). An Introduction to Critical Thinking. Routledge.

Related Assignments