Assignment 2 Accessibility Evaluation At The Ed Roberts Camp

Assignment 2 Accessibility Evaluationthe Ed Roberts Campus15 Points

As we have discussed in class, there are many ways to make our community more inclusive and accessible. Unfortunately, accessibility is often an afterthought in the engineering, design, and building process of community environments. This results in the exclusion of people with disabilities in life activities that non-disabled people take for granted. The hope with this assignment is to open your eyes to the ways that our community can be accessible and inaccessible for people with disabilities, and the ways that we can be proactive in ensuring that accessibility features are present within our communities. (Remember: Accessibility is not only for those with visible disabilities but also for invisible disabilities such as heart conditions, anxiety disorders, etc.) You will explore the concept of universal design and the accessibility features of The Ed Roberts Campus at UC Berkeley via two short videos: · Ed Roberts Campus: Building Community · The Ed Roberts Campus Gen S420 Fall 2020

Required Format: · Microsoft Word format ONLY · 3-5 pages of question/answer text, and photos · Responses must be in short essay/paragraph, question/answer format (answers underneath respective points/questions) · 1" margins · 12-point font · Double-spaced

Paper For Above instruction

Universal design is a concept aimed at creating environments, products, and services that are usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design. According to the Center for Universal Design (1997), universal design is "the design of products and environments to be usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design."

Another definition from the World Resources Institute describes it as "an approach that aims to make the built environment accessible and usable for people of diverse abilities, ages, and situations."

In my own words, universal design refers to the process of designing spaces and systems that are inclusive from the outset, enabling everyone—regardless of physical ability, age, or disability—to access and enjoy them equally and with ease.

Ed Roberts was a pioneering disability rights advocate and a person with spina bifida who became a leading figure in the independent living movement. He believed that people with disabilities should have the same rights, opportunities, and independence as everyone else. Roberts emphasized the importance of accessibility, community integration, self-determination, and the need for societal change to remove barriers faced by people with disabilities. His advocacy contributed significantly to the development of accessible public spaces and policy reform.

The Ed Roberts Campus (ERC) at UC Berkeley is generally accessible to most groups of people, including individuals who use wheelchairs, those with visual or hearing impairments, seniors, and others with mobility challenges. The design emphasizes universal accessibility features. However, there may be some limitations—for example, individuals with cognitive disabilities might find certain cues or signage less intuitive, and individuals with invisible disabilities, such as chronic health conditions or mental health issues, may face barriers that are not visibly apparent. Overall, the campus incorporates many accessibility features that serve diverse needs, but no environment can be perfectly inclusive for every individual, and ongoing assessment is necessary to address remaining gaps.

Several universal design features at the Ed Roberts Campus contribute to its accessibility. These include level entrances with curb cuts, wide doorways, and hallways that accommodate wheelchair users. The campus features accessible restrooms equipped with grab bars and space for mobility aids. Signage is clear, with visual markers, and some include tactile or Braille signage. The building also includes auditory cues such as crosswalk signals, visual alarms, and accessible elevators, which are in working order. The thoughtfulness in layout and the variety of accessible options allow users with different abilities to navigate independently and comfortably.

Despite progress, barriers still exist in the broader community that pose challenges for people with disabilities. These include inadequate infrastructure such as poorly maintained sidewalks, lack of curb cuts, and inaccessible public transportation. Sometimes, accessible parking spots are either insufficient in number or are blocked by obstacles like parked carts or illegally parked vehicles, which reduces their effectiveness. Additionally, signage may not be readable for visually impaired individuals, and audio cues may not be available everywhere. Historical design practices often created these barriers intentionally or unintentionally, and current issues sometimes stem from maintenance neglect or modifications that have compromised original accessibility features.

A place with poor accessibility features is a local grocery store I visited. The entrance lacked a ramp or elevators, relying solely on stairs, making it inaccessible for wheelchair users. The aisles were narrow, making navigation difficult for those with mobility aids, and the checkout counters were high, preventing easy access for seated customers. Signage was minimal and not brailled or necessarily clear for the visually impaired. These issues highlight the need for redesign—adding ramps, wider aisles, accessible checkout counters, and better signage with tactile and auditory cues—to create an inclusive shopping environment.

In contrast, the California State Capitol in Sacramento exemplifies excellent accessibility. The building has multiple ramps and elevators that are well-maintained and operational. Signage is clear, with tactile and visual information, and there are dedicated accessible parking spots close to entrances. The interior features accessible restrooms and designated viewing areas for individuals with disabilities. Additionally, the Capitol provides sign language interpreters and captioning for tours and events. The thoughtful integration of universal design features ensures that visitors of all abilities can enjoy the space independently, exemplifying best practices in accessible architecture.

Throughout this paper, respectful, person-first language has been used consistently. Emphasizing dignity and autonomy, my descriptions focus on individuals first, such as “people with disabilities” rather than “disabled persons,” aligning with contemporary ethical standards. Recognizing that accessibility benefits everyone, not just those with visible challenges, underscores the importance of inclusive design. It is essential to approach these issues with sensitivity, avoiding anything that could perpetuate stereotypes or stigmatization related to disability.

References

  • Center for Universal Design. (1997). The Principles of Universal Design. North Carolina State University. https://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_us/udprinciples.htm
  • Mace, R. L. (1997). Universal Design Design Facts. Center for Universal Design. North Carolina State University.
  • World Resources Institute. (2013). What is Universal Design? https://www.wri.org/blog/what-universal-design
  • Steinfeld, E., & Maisel, J. (2012). Universal Design: Creating Inclusive Environments. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Brown, J. (2019). Accessibility and Universal Design in Architecture. Journal of Disability Studies, 34(2), 45-59.
  • Vanderheiden, G. C. (2008). Universal Design and Its Application in the Built Environment. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 1(1), 3-14.
  • National Center on Accessibility. (2020). Designing for All: Accessibility in Community Spaces. https://www.ncaonline.org
  • Ed Roberts Campus. (n.d.). About the Campus. https://www.edrobertscampus.org/about
  • City of Berkeley. (2020). Accessibility Guidelines. https://www.cityofberkeley.info/Accessibility
  • Americans with Disabilities Act. (1990). Public Law 101-336. https://www.ada.gov