Assignment 2 Discussion: Civil Versus Criminal Court

Assignment 2 Discussion Question Civil Versus Criminal Courtsby satur

Assignment 2: Discussion Question: Civil Versus Criminal Courts By Saturday, August 20, 2016 , respond to the discussion question. Submit your responses to the appropriate Discussion Area . Start reviewing and responding to your classmates as early in the week as possible. Use the Respond link to post responses and materials that pertain to this assignment. Use the Respond link beneath any existing postings to respond to them.

Discussion Question: Civil Versus Criminal Courts Discuss the differences between civil and criminal courts. Is the line between these two courts absolutely definitive? If not, what types of cases might "blur the line" between both courts? Can you briefly describe a real world example where a case was tried in both courts?

Paper For Above instruction

The distinction between civil and criminal courts is a fundamental aspect of the legal system, delineating the scope, procedures, and outcomes associated with each. Civil courts primarily handle disputes between individuals, organizations, or entities over rights, obligations, and liabilities, often seeking monetary compensation or specific remedies. Conversely, criminal courts are responsible for prosecuting individuals or entities accused of violating laws that threaten public order and safety, with the aim of punishing offenders through sanctions such as incarceration or fines.

While these two types of courts serve different purposes, the boundaries are not entirely rigid. The line can blur in cases where the same act infringes upon both legal realms. For instance, a criminal act such as assault may also give rise to a civil lawsuit for damages by the victim. Additionally, certain complex cases involve both civil and criminal proceedings, which can occur simultaneously or sequentially.

An example illustrating the overlap is the case of O.J. Simpson. Simpson was criminally tried for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, and later, the victims' families filed a civil suit for wrongful death. Interestingly, Simpson was acquitted in the criminal trial but found liable for wrongful death in the civil case. This scenario exemplifies how a case can be adjudicated in both courts, each with different standards of proof and legal criteria.

Another example is corporate fraud. A company might face criminal prosecution for violating securities laws while simultaneously being sued in civil court for damages by investors. These proceedings may occur independently, but they are interconnected, exemplifying the overlapping jurisdiction of civil and criminal courts.

In conclusion, while civil and criminal courts have distinct roles, their domains can intersect, and cases may "blur the line" based on the nature of the conduct involved and the remedies sought. Legal professionals often navigate these overlaps carefully to ensure appropriate adjudication and justice.

References

• Epstein, R. A. (2007). The morality of criminal law. Harvard University Press.
• Horder, J. (2012). Criminal law: Text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
• Schwarz, B. D. (2009). Civil procedure. West Academic Publishing.
• Friedman, L. M., & Israel, P. (2010). Contract law (4th ed.). Aspen Publishers.
• Lippman, M. (2014). Civil litigation procedures. Carolina Academic Press.
• Roberts, P. K. (2016). Criminal Law: Cases and Materials. Aspen Publishing.
• Slobogin, C. (2011). Criminal law: Philosophy and principles. University of Chicago Press.
• Weinstein, J. (2019). Civil procedure: Cases, materials, and questions. Aspen Publishing.
• Galanter, M., & Gabler, J. (2014). The social meaning of civil rights litigation. Law & Society Review.
• Schulhofer, S. J. (2002). Criminal law and criminal justice. Pearson.