Assignment 2: Discussion—Financial Analysis Access An Overvi

Assignment 2: Discussion—Financial Analysis Access an overview of your c

Choose three ratios from each category (liquidity, solvency, and profitability). Calculate the financial ratios for each of your companies. Describe what the results of your calculations reveal about each of your three companies when compared with one another. Answer the following questions with clear explanations as to how you arrived at the answers: Which company is more liquid? Which company has the strongest net income? Which company has the strongest solvency? Which company is most profitable? Which company would be the most solid financial investment? Why? Be sure to cite any sources using APA style.

By the end of the module, provide substantive responses to at least two other students' initial posts, as well as any posts to you by your instructor. Be sure to post to the Discussion Area on two different days to meet your weekly attendance requirement.

Paper For Above instruction

Financial ratio analysis is an essential tool for evaluating the financial health of companies. It provides insights into liquidity, solvency, and profitability, which are crucial for investors, managers, and stakeholders to make informed decisions. In this analysis, I will select three ratios from each of these categories, calculate them for three companies, and interpret the results to determine their financial strengths and weaknesses.

Liquidity Ratios

Liquidity ratios measure a company's ability to meet its short-term obligations. The three common liquidity ratios include the current ratio, quick ratio, and cash ratio. These ratios help assess whether a company has sufficient liquid assets to cover its immediate liabilities.

Current Ratio

The current ratio is calculated as current assets divided by current liabilities. A higher current ratio indicates better liquidity. For example, Company A has current assets of $500,000 and current liabilities of $250,000, resulting in a current ratio of 2.0. Company B has current assets of $600,000 and current liabilities of $300,000, also resulting in a current ratio of 2.0. Company C has current assets of $400,000 and current liabilities of $200,000, with a current ratio of 2.0. All three companies demonstrate similar liquidity levels based on this ratio.

Quick Ratio

The quick ratio, or acid-test ratio, is calculated as (current assets - inventories) divided by current liabilities. Suppose Company A has inventories worth $100,000, then its quick ratio is (500,000 - 100,000) / 250,000 = 1.6. Company B's inventories are $200,000, resulting in a quick ratio of (600,000 - 200,000) / 300,000 = 1.33. Company C's inventories are $50,000, leading to a quick ratio of (400,000 - 50,000) / 200,000 = 1.75. Therefore, Company C demonstrates the strongest liquidity when considering the quick ratio.

Cash Ratio

The cash ratio is calculated as cash and cash equivalents divided by current liabilities. Assume Company A has $50,000 in cash, Company B has $70,000, and Company C has $30,000. Their cash ratios are 0.2, 0.23, and 0.15, respectively, indicating that Company B has the most immediate cash available to cover liabilities.

Solvency Ratios

Solvency ratios assess a company's ability to meet its long-term obligations. Key ratios include debt-to-equity, debt ratio, and interest coverage ratio.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

This ratio is calculated as total liabilities divided by shareholders' equity. Assuming Company A has total liabilities of $200,000 and equity of $300,000, its debt-to-equity ratio is 0.67. Company B has liabilities of $400,000 and equity of $600,000, resulting in a ratio of 0.67 as well. Company C has liabilities of $250,000 and equity of $250,000, resulting in a ratio of 1.0. Lower ratios indicate less leverage and higher solvency. Therefore, Companies A and B are more solvent than Company C.

Debt Ratio

The debt ratio is total liabilities divided by total assets. Suppose Company A has total assets of $500,000; its debt ratio is 0.4. Company B's total assets are $1,000,000 with liabilities of $400,000, resulting in a debt ratio of 0.4. Company C has total assets of $500,000 and liabilities of $250,000, leading to a debt ratio of 0.5. Again, lower ratios suggest stronger solvency, favoring Companies A and B.

Interest Coverage Ratio

This ratio measures earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) divided by interest expense. If Company A has EBIT of $80,000 and interest expense of $10,000, its ratio is 8.0. Company B has EBIT of $150,000 and interest expense of $25,000, resulting in 6.0. Company C's EBIT is $50,000 with interest expenses of $5,000, giving a ratio of 10.0. These indicate that Company C has the most robust ability to service its debt.

Profitability Ratios

Profitability ratios evaluate a company's ability to generate profit. The three ratios include net profit margin, return on assets (ROA), and return on equity (ROE).

Net Profit Margin

The net profit margin is net income divided by revenue. Assuming Company A reports net income of $50,000 on revenue of $200,000, the margin is 25%. Company B reports $100,000 net income on $400,000 revenue, also 25%. Company C reports $20,000 net income on $100,000 revenue, resulting in a 20% margin. Companies A and B are equally profitable in terms of net profit margin.

Return on Assets (ROA)

ROA is calculated as net income divided by total assets. For Company A, ROA is $50,000 / $500,000 = 10%. For Company B, it’s $100,000 / $1,000,000 = 10%. For Company C, it’s $20,000 / $500,000 = 4%. Companies A and B are more efficient in generating income from their assets.

Return on Equity (ROE)

ROE is net income divided by shareholders' equity. Company A's ROE is $50,000 / $300,000 = 16.7%. Company B's ROE is $100,000 / $600,000 = 16.7%. Company C's ROE is $20,000 / $250,000 = 8%. Companies A and B again show superior performance relative to Company C.

Comparative Analysis and Investment Decision

Based on the calculated ratios:

  • The most liquid company appears to be Company C, given its superior quick ratio and cash ratio.
  • Both Companies A and B show equal and strong profitability and asset efficiency metrics, whereas Company C ranks lower in profitability ratios.
  • In terms of solvency, Companies A and B have lower debt-to-equity and debt ratios, indicating they are more financially stable long-term.
  • Company C exhibits strong debt servicing capability with a high interest coverage ratio but faces liquidity concerns.

Given this, although Company C demonstrates excellent solvency and liquidity on certain measures, Companies A and B show a more balanced profile with solid profitability and lower leverage, suggesting they may be the most solid investments overall.

Investment decisions should consider not only financial ratios but also industry position, growth potential, and market conditions. Nevertheless, based purely on financial health metrics, Companies A and B represent more stable and promising investment options due to their strong profitability, manageable leverage, and consistent liquidity.

References

  • Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of Financial Management (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Wild, J. J., Subramanyam, K. R., & Halsey, R. F. (2014). Financial statement analysis (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Penman, S. H. (2013). Financial statement analysis and security valuation (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Fraser, L. M., & Ormiston, A. (2016). Understanding Financial Statements (10th ed.). Pearson.
  • White, G. I., Sondhi, A. C., & Fried, D. (2003). The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements (3rd ed.). Wiley Publishing.
  • Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2016). Corporate Finance (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Gibson, C. H. (2013). Financial Reporting and Analysis (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Palepu, K. G., & Healy, P. M. (2013). Business Analysis & Valuation: Using Financial Statements (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Higgins, R. C. (2012). Analysis for Financial Management (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Revsine, L., Collins, W. W., Johnson, D. J., & Mittelstaedt, F. H. (2015). Financial Reporting & Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

Related Assignments