Assignment 2: Estimating Cash Flows Assume Your Company I

Assignment 2 Estimating Cash Flowsassume That Your Company Is Conside

Assume that your company is considering the replacement of an automated milling machine with one of the new machines offered by three different manufacturers. Each of the three machines under consideration is expected to have an economic life of five years and will result in greater daily production capacity and therefore increased sales volume. The increased volume will require an increase in working capital during the first year to a level that will remain constant until the end of the five years. The decision of which specific machine to select will depend on a net present value analysis. The old machine has reached the end of its estimated useful life and can be sold at the salvage value that was projected when the machine was first installed.

Listed below are factors that may be essential for inclusion when estimating project cash flows. The factors may be required to correctly calculate either the initial investment, the operating cash flows, or the terminal value that would be analyzed to determine the net present value of the project. It is also possible that certain factors could be used in more than one of the three categories of cash flow. Another possibility is that the factor listed is not relevant to cash flow estimation for this specific scenario. Your task is to identify whether the factor would be included in the calculation for the initial investment, or the operating cash flow, or the terminal value, or is not relevant to this decision.

You must also explain whether failure to appropriately include the factor in the calculation would result in overstating or understating the net present value of the project.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of capital budgeting involves critical analysis of various factors that influence the valuation of an investment project. In the context of replacing an existing milling machine with new equipment, it is essential to delineate which factors affect initial investment, operational cash flows, and terminal value, and how their inclusion or exclusion impacts the net present value (NPV) estimation. Correct classification ensures accurate decision-making and optimal allocation of resources.

Initial Investment Factors

The purchase price of the capital asset is fundamental to the initial investment calculation. It represents the upfront capital outlay required to acquire the new milling machine. Failure to include this factor would significantly underestimate the initial cash outflow, leading to an overstated NPV, thereby presenting a potentially misleading attractiveness of the project.

Cost of shipping and installing the new equipment is also integral to initial investment. This cost enhances the acquisition expenditure and, if omitted, results in an understated initial investment, consequently overstating the project's NPV. Accurate inclusion of these costs provides a truthful depiction of the initial cash flow repercussions of the investment.

The total company sales revenue, while indicative of performance, is usually considered in operating cash flows rather than initial investment but may indirectly influence initial valuation if sales figures impact working capital calculations.

The interest on the loan used to finance the asset purchase, although relevant for financing decision-making, is typically excluded from NPV calculations because NPV assesses the project's operational viability independent of financing structure. Including interest payments could distort the analysis, leading either to overstating or understating NPV depending on treatment.

Incremental initial depreciation expense does not impact the cash flow directly but affects taxable income and thus taxes paid; however, it is incorporated in the operating cash flow model, not initial investment.

Operating Cash Flow Factors

The incremental annual depreciation expense influences the taxable income and cash taxes paid, thus affecting operating cash flows positively through depreciation tax shields. Failure to include depreciation would underestimate operating cash flows and underestimate NPV.

Total net income before tax and incremental net income before tax are vital for calculating the cash flows from operations. Omitting these figures would distort the expected profitability and cash flow estimates, leading to inaccurate NPV calculations.

Cash realized from the sale of the old machine at its estimated salvage value is relevant in the initial investment calculation since it provides the salvage proceeds subtracted from the initial outlay, but may also have tax implications influencing operating cash flows.

Increase in working capital during the first year is critical since it represents an initial cash outflow, necessary for preparing the production capacity increase. Ignoring this would overstate the project’s cash inflows, overstating NPV.

Decrease in working capital is typically expected at project termination when the investment is recovered. Its inclusion affects terminal cash flows rather than operating cash flow, but must be modeled accurately.

Investment tax credit can be a significant incentive, reducing the initial investment, and thus increasing NPV if included appropriately.

Future sales revenue is a driver of operating cash flows, as increased revenue leads to higher cash inflows from operations. Neglecting sales growth would underestimate the benefits of the project, understating NPV.

Terminal Value Factors

The salvage value of the new machines at the end of five years represents the residual value. Proper inclusion reflects the salvage proceeds, which increase the terminal cash flow and, if omitted, understates NPV.

Cost of shipping and installing during initial acquisition is not a factor at terminal valuation unless reinstallation costs are necessary at the end of the project, which is typically not the case here.

The remaining book value of depreciable assets at project end can be relevant if considering tax implications of residual book value.

Although not explicitly listed, macroeconomic factors like inflation or market conditions could influence residual value estimation but are not directly listed as factors.

Conclusion

Proper classification and inclusion of these factors in the appropriate categories are crucial to obtaining an accurate NPV. Omitting relevant costs or benefits leads to distorted valuations—either overstated or understated—that can mislead strategic decision-making. Recognizing the role each factor plays ensures a thorough and precise financial evaluation of replacing machinery, supporting optimal capital investment choices.

References

• Berk, J., & DeMarzo, P. (2020). Corporate Finance (5th ed.). Pearson.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R., & Jordan, B. D. (2019). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2019). Financial Management: Theory & Practice (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Damodaran, A. (2015). Applied Corporate Finance. Wiley.
• Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2019). Principles of Corporate Finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Higgins, R. C. (2012). Analysis for Financial Management (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ross, S., & Westerfield, R. (2018). Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2-3), 187-243.
• Copeland, T., Weston, J. F., & Shastri, K. (2021). Financial Theory and Corporate Policy. Pearson.
• Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.