Assignment 2: Ethical Decision-Making—Personal Experiences

Assignment 2 Ethical Decision Making—Personal Experiences

Each of us faces ethical decisions on a daily basis. In this assignment, you will explore an ethical decision you have made in your life. Tasks: Present an ethical choice that you have made in your life, preferably related to IT. Discuss the situation, enumerate the alternatives that you had to choose from, and guide us through your thought process as you arrived at your decision. Review the same decision in light of the various ethical theories reviewed in this module.

Would you have arrived at the same decision in all cases? How would an alternative ethical theory have changed the decision? If an alternative ethical theory would have resulted in a different decision, would the decision be still morally justifiable?

Paper For Above instruction

Everyday ethical decisions shape our personal and professional lives, particularly in fields like Information Technology (IT) where choices can impact privacy, security, and societal trust. Reflecting on a personal experience of ethical decision-making in an IT context provides deeper insight into the complex considerations involved. This paper explores such a decision, analyzes the thought process behind it, evaluates it through various ethical frameworks, and considers how different theoretical approaches might alter the outcome.

The ethical decision I wish to analyze pertains to a situation where I was involved in managing a project that required handling sensitive user data. The dilemma arose when I discovered a flaw in the system that could potentially compromise user privacy but addressing it would delay the project and incur additional costs. I had to choose between immediately reporting the vulnerability and risking project delays, or concealing the issue to meet project deadlines, which could jeopardize user trust and violate privacy principles.

The alternatives faced were: (1) Report the flaw transparently, risking project delays and additional expenses; (2) Conceal the flaw and proceed with the launch; or (3) Delay the launch until the flaw could be adequately addressed, balancing project timelines with ethical responsibility. My initial thought process involved assessing the importance of user privacy, the obligations towards stakeholders, and the potential consequences of each option. I recognized that transparency aligned with ethical standards regarding honesty and responsibility, whereas concealment could lead to ethical violations and damage trust.

Applying ethical theories to this decision reveals different perspectives. From a deontological standpoint, which emphasizes duty and adherence to moral rules, reporting the flaw is the morally correct action, as honesty and responsibility are paramount regardless of consequences. Kantian ethics would similarly support transparency, as it respects the inherent dignity of users and the moral duty to be truthful. Conversely, utilitarianism would evaluate the decision based on the outcomes; concealing the flaw might result in a successful project launch, benefitting stakeholders economically and professionally, but at the risk of harm if the vulnerability leads to data breaches later.

Considering the utilitarian approach, if the short-term benefits of concealing the flaw outweigh the long-term harms, one might consider it justifiable—though this is ethically problematic. It raises critical questions about the morality of sacrificing future trust for immediate gains. Personally, I believe that even from a utilitarian perspective, transparency ultimately maximizes overall well-being, especially if potential breaches could cause significant suffering and damage organizational integrity.

Had I applied a virtue ethics perspective, emphasizing moral character and integrity, my decision would unequivocally lean towards honesty and responsibility. Virtues such as honesty, courage, and responsibility support openness about vulnerabilities. This approach not only aligns with ethical conduct but also cultivates a culture of trust and accountability within the team and organization.

If I had relied on consequentialist reasoning alone, I might have favored concealing the flaw to avoid immediate setbacks. However, I believe that moral justifiability extends beyond immediate consequences; it involves consistency with moral principles. As such, even if the decision could be justified differently under alternative ethical theories, I am convinced that transparency and accountability are morally essential, reinforcing trust and safeguarding users’ rights.

This experience underscores the importance of applying multiple ethical perspectives to make well-rounded decisions. While outcome-based approaches like utilitarianism are tempting, they risk justify ethically questionable actions if solely relied upon. A balanced ethical assessment, incorporating deontological and virtue ethics considerations, leads to decisions that uphold moral integrity and foster organizational trustworthiness.

References

• Beuchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Bowden, V. J. (2014). Ethical Decision Making in Information Technology. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(3), 427-436.
• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Gert, B. (2013). Morality: Its Nature and Justification. Oxford University Press.
• Johnson, D. G. (2014). Computer Ethics. Routledge.
• Kidder, R. M. (2005). How Good People Make Tough Choices. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Ross, W. D. (1930). The Right and the Good. Oxford University Press.
• Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
• Turner, D. (2020). The Ethical Challenges of Data Privacy and Security. Ethics and Information Technology, 22(2), 191-204.
• Valentine, S. R., & Fleischer, S. (2014). Ethical Decision Making in IT. Journal of Information Systems, 28(1), 59-75.