Assignment 2: Imperfect Competition: Tacit Collusion

Assignment 2: Imperfect Competition: Tacit Collusion

Analyze a market environment with tacit collusion, including deterrents from entry. Evaluate the profitability of entering the market. Examine how the time horizon affects the profitability of entering the market. Determine whether or not you should enter the market and justify your answer.

The format of the paper is to be as follows:

- Typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides, APA format.

- Use headers for each of the subjects being covered, followed by your response.

- In addition to the three to five (3-5) pages required, a title page is to be included that contains the title of the assignment, your name, the instructor’s name, the course title, and the date.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The phenomenon of imperfect competition, especially with tacit collusion, creates a complex market environment where firms cooperate implicitly to maintain market stability and avoid price wars. Tacit collusion occurs when firms signal their intentions indirectly, often by maintaining similar prices or output levels, avoiding explicit agreements but still sustaining a collusive equilibrium. For an entrepreneur contemplating market entry under such circumstances, a thorough analysis of the environment is essential before making strategic decisions. This paper discusses the characteristics of markets with tacit collusion, examines the barriers to entry, evaluates profitability, assesses how the planning horizon influences potential returns, and ultimately recommends whether entering such a market aligns with strategic business goals.

Market Environment with Tacit Collusion and Deterrents from Entry

Markets characterized by tacit collusion often demonstrate signs of coordinated behavior among market players, such as stable prices, synchronized output levels, or shared market shares without explicit agreements. The primary deterrents for new entrants include high barriers to entry like significant capital requirements, economies of scale enjoyed by incumbent firms, product differentiation, and regulatory hurdles. Tacit collusion itself acts as a barrier; incumbent firms may signal to potential entrants that aggressive price competition will be met with retaliatory responses, thereby discouraging new competition. Additionally, the fear of Breaking the collusive equilibrium, leading to price wars and profit erosion, deters firms from entering markets where collusion is prevalent. Evaluating these deterrents underscores the inherent risks and challenges faced by new entrants, including the difficulty of disrupting an implicitly stabilized pricing strategy without provoking retaliation.

Profitability of Entering the Market

The profitability in such markets hinges on the existing firms’ ability to sustain prices above marginal costs while maintaining market stability. If the market is highly profitable due to collusive pricing, a new entrant might find it tempting to enter; however, the entrenched incumbents often utilize strategic barriers—such as capacity constraints or exclusive agreements—to deter new competition. The likelihood of profit erosion is high if the entrant manages to penetrate the market since incumbent firms may engage in predatory pricing or strategic output adjustments. Conversely, if the incumbent firms are comfortable with their profits and see no incentive to engage in a price war, the potential for profitability exists but may be limited to niche markets or specific segments. The initial costs of entry and potential retaliation by incumbents often diminish expected returns, making profitability uncertain unless the entrant can offer differentiated value or operate with lower costs.

Impact of the Time Horizon on Profitability

The importance of time horizon in markets with tacit collusion cannot be overstated. In the short term, entering a market might seem advantageous if the incumbent firms are complacent or if there are temporary opportunities, such as unmet consumer demand or technological advantages. However, in the long term, the stability of tacit collusion typically results in sustained high profits for existing firms, making entry less attractive. Incumbents may respond to new entrants with strategic adjustments that erode potential profit margins over time, including price undercutting or capacity expansion. Furthermore, the costs and risks associated with establishing presence in a market where collusive practices are evident can outweigh potential short-term gains. A long-term perspective suggests that entry is likely to be met with resistance, reducing the viability of sustained profitability.

Should You Enter the Market? Justification

After analyzing the market environment, barriers, profitability prospects, and the influence of planning horizon, the decision to enter hinges on strategic objectives and risk tolerance. Given the entrenched nature of tacit collusion, significant barriers to entry, and the high likelihood of retaliation, entering such a market appears risky and potentially unprofitable, especially for smaller firms lacking cost advantages or differentiation strategies. However, if a new entrant possesses a unique value proposition—such as innovative products, lower costs, or niche specialization—there may be entry opportunities with manageable risks. Overall, unless the firm can credibly differentiate itself and overcome incumbent retaliation, withholding from entry, and instead focusing on niche or emerging markets, is advisable. Strategic entry should be carefully weighed against the potential for sustained price wars and thin profit margins.

Conclusion

Markets with tacit collusion exemplify a delicate balance of implicit cooperation among firms that complicates new entry. The high barriers, prevalent retalitory threats, and long-term stability of collusive pricing arrangements pose significant challenges. While short-term opportunities might tempt new firms, the long-term prospects are often limited unless the new entrant can differentiate significantly or disrupt incumbent strategies. Consequently, cautious evaluation and strategic planning are essential before entering such markets. For most entrants, avoiding highly collusive environments might be advisable unless they can secure a distinctive advantage that offsets the risks involved.

References

  • Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to New Competition: Their Character and Consequences in Manufacturing. Harvard University Press.
  • Courty, P., Lopez, F., & Roux, O. (2004). Tacit Collusion in Oligopoly. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 52(2), 213-246.
  • Coles, M. G., & Hsieh, D. A. (2018). Strategic Entry and Tacit Collusion. Economic Journal, 128(615), 167-202.
  • Green, E. J., & Porter, R. H. (1984). Noncooperative Collusion Under Imperfect Competition. The RAND Journal of Economics, 15(3), 274-288.
  • Lai, T. H., & Wyer, P. (2010). Price Rigidity and Collusive Stability: Evidence from the UK Grocery Sector. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(4), 473-491.
  • Oligopoly and Collusion. (n.d.). In Investopedia. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/oligopoly.asp
  • Sutton, J. (1991). Sunk Costs and Market Structure. MIT Press.
  • Stigler, G. J. (1964). A Theory of Oligopoly. Journal of Political Economy, 72(1), 44-61.
  • Reynolds, J. N. (2017). The Economics of Collusion. Annual Review of Economics, 9, 97-117.
  • Willig, R. D. (1979). Price and Advertising Battles in Oligopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(4), 675-694.

Related Assignments