Assignment 2: Impression Management 702677

Assignment 2 Impression Managementimpression Management Is Something

Impression management is a social process where individuals attempt to control or influence how others perceive them, often to achieve specific goals such as appearing likable, competent, or authoritative. This strategy can be employed consciously or unconsciously and varies depending on the context and the desired outcomes. Understanding when and why individuals use impression management, as well as its potential pitfalls, offers valuable insight into human social behavior.

Typically, I am most likely to use impression management in professional settings, such as during job interviews or important meetings. In these situations, presenting myself as capable, confident, and well-prepared increases my chances of favorable outcomes, like securing a position or establishing credibility. Conversely, I am less inclined to employ impression management in close personal relationships where authenticity tends to be more valued, and attempts at impression management may seem insincere or unnecessary. For example, in casual conversations with friends or family, I prefer to express my genuine thoughts and feelings rather than managing impressions.

The primary difference between these situations lies in their contextual goals and emotional stakes. In professional contexts, impression management aims to project competence, self-control, or confidence, often to influence others' perceptions for career advancement. Personal settings, however, prioritize genuine connection and trust, making authenticity more desirable than strategic impression management. An example of successful impression management occurred during a job interview where I highlighted my skills and experiences confidently. This approach helped me secure the position because the interviewer perceived me as competent and prepared, aligning with the impression I aimed to project.

On the other hand, I experienced a situation where impression management failed. During a team presentation, I attempted to appear more knowledgeable than I genuinely was, hoping to impress colleagues and superiors. However, I became overly defensive when challenged, which led to appearing insecure and lacking credibility. The outcome was a diminished trust in my competence and a perception of superficiality, making the impression worse than if I had been honest about my limitations from the start. This failure occurred because I overestimated the ability to maintain a façade under pressure and underestimated the value of authenticity and humility.

Reflecting on this failed attempt, I believe that adopting a self-handicapping strategy might have improved outcomes. For instance, admitting beforehand that I was somewhat unfamiliar with a particular aspect of the project could have reduced pressure and allowed me to explain my true level of knowledge more honestly. A specific self-handicapping strategy might have been to proactively claim a need for additional research or support, which would have set realistic expectations and reduced the risk of appearing insecure or unprepared.

However, relying on self-handicapping strategies regularly carries risks. It can become a pattern that undermines self-confidence and authenticity, ultimately leading to a diminished perception of competence from others. Over time, individuals may develop a habit of sabotage, which hampers genuine growth and damages trust. Furthermore, excessive self-handicapping may cause chronic stress and anxiety, as the individual continually feels the need to justify or diminish their abilities.

Conclusion

Impression management is a nuanced social skill that can be beneficial when used strategically, especially in contexts where shaping perceptions can lead to positive outcomes. Nonetheless, it must be balanced with authenticity and self-awareness. Recognizing the situations in which impression management is appropriate, and understanding its limitations and potential pitfalls, is essential for maintaining genuine relationships and personal integrity. Employing self-handicapping strategies can sometimes offer short-term relief but risks long-term damage if relied upon excessively. Ultimately, the ability to navigate these social tactics with ethical awareness and self-knowledge can greatly enhance one's interpersonal effectiveness.

References

• Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books.
• Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Development, and Relationships. Brooks/Cole.
• Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34–47.
• Tice, D. M. (1992). Impression management and the self: A theoretical perspective. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research (pp. 11-31). Springer.
• Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A review of self-esteem: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 341–352.
• Hall, J. A., & Mast, M. S. (2008). Social anxiety and impression management. In M. S. Mast & J. A. Hall (Eds.), The Psychology of Social Anxiety (pp. 99-122). Nova Science Publishers.
• Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological Perspectives on the Self (pp. 231–262). Erlbaum.
• Riggio, R. E. (2010). Introduction to nonverbal communication. Routledge.
• Wood, J. T. (2016). Interpersonal Communication: Everyday Encounters. Cengage Learning.
• DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2004). The short-term and long-term effects of impression management. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(5), 673-684.