Assignment 2: Lasa Project Planning Developing The Project P

Assignment 2 Lasa Project Planning Developing The Project Plan

Assignment 2: LASA – Project Planning – Developing the Project Plan and Determining Critical Path Using the District4WarehouseMove WBS.xls provided, create a Microsoft project plan for the District 4 Warehouse Move project. Use the PDF document, Project Plan Check – District4Move, to check your work to be sure you have created your starting project plan correctly. Microsoft Project is required for this task. If you have not yet downloaded OpenProj, please click here and follow the directions to do so now. Note: you will need to insert a column to include your WBS codes, then you will need to sequence the tasks to show tasks by work package.

It may help to review the Microsoft tutorial, Sequencing tasks in a project: Based upon the details in the WBS and the project case, determine which tasks need to be completed first and which tasks are dependent upon other tasks to be completed prior to starting. Using this information identify predecessors in your project plan’s predecessor column. Complete the predecessor column by entering the line number of tasks that must be completed in order for each task to start. This will create your project timeline. Note: This is a critical step in the process to developing your critical path.

It may help to review the Microsoft tutorial, Creating relationships between tasks: Using the View Network Diagram functionality within MS Project, determine the critical path for this project. In a MS Word document, list the activities that are on the critical path. Considering the risks identified in the risk table below, identify which risks would be most likely to increase your project timeline. Justify your responses. Submit both your completed project plan and your MS Word document. District 4 Production Warehouse Move Project - Risk Table 1 Permits are not received per the schedule 2 Finish work contractors walk off the job half way through 3 Framing and drywall contractors are running behind schedule and can only produce half their crew as scheduled 4 Work benches are poor quality and 1/3 will have to be rebuilt.

Paper For Above instruction

The District 4 Warehouse Move project presents a complex logistical challenge that requires meticulous planning to ensure timely and efficient execution. Creating an accurate and detailed project plan in Microsoft Project involves understanding task dependencies, sequencing activities correctly, and identifying the critical path to focus on tasks that directly influence project duration. This paper discusses the process of developing this project plan, determining dependencies, and analyzing risks that could impact the project timeline.

To begin, a comprehensive Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) provided in the Excel file served as the foundation for the project plan. Utilizing Microsoft Project, the first step involved inserting a WBS code column for proper task identification and organization within work packages. Then, tasks were sequenced in logical order, considering dependencies outlined in the WBS and project case. For example, site preparation could not commence until permits were obtained, and moving tasks depended on the completion of construction and setup activities.

Establishing task predecessors is vital for creating an accurate project timeline. By examining the WBS details and the project's contextual information, I assigned predecessor line numbers to each task in Microsoft Project, ensuring that activities only begin once preceding tasks are completed. This step is crucial in revealing the project's flow and identifying the critical path. The critical path includes tasks that, if delayed, would directly impact the project’s completion date. Using the Network Diagram view in MS Project, I was able to visualize task relationships and confirm the critical path. These tasks include permit acquisition, site clearance, and the actual warehouse relocation activities.

Moreover, identifying risks that could extend the project schedule is essential for risk mitigation. The risk table provided highlights four primary risks: delays in permit acquisition, workers walking off the job, subcontractors falling behind schedule, and issues with workbench quality. After analyzing these risks, it is evident that delays in permit approval and subcontractor performance are likely to have the most significant impact on project duration. Permits are a prerequisite for numerous activities; any delay here would cascade through the schedule, pushing back subsequent tasks such as site setup and relocation. Similarly, subcontractor delays, especially in framing and drywall, threaten to extend the timeline considerably.

For example, if permits are not received on time, construction activities and initial site preparations would be pushed back, delaying the entire project schedule. This can result in increased labor costs, resource misallocation, and potential contractual penalties. Likewise, if framing and drywall contractors are unable to meet their schedule, rework and adjustments will be necessary, leading to further delays. Conversely, risks such as poor-quality workbenches, though disruptive, are less likely to influence the overall project completion unless they cause significant rework or material delays.

In conclusion, developing an effective project plan for the District 4 Warehouse Move involves precise task sequencing, clear identification of dependencies, and focus on critical path activities. Recognizing the most impactful risks allows project managers to prioritize mitigation strategies, such as expedited permit processing or contingency plans for critical subcontractor delays. By thoroughly analyzing these components, the project team can better ensure that the warehouse relocation completes on schedule, minimizing unforeseen delays and associated costs.

References

• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
• Larson, E., & Gray, C. (2018). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
• PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Project Management Institute.
• Wideman, R. M. (2002). Project and Program Risk Management. Project Management Journal, 33(1), 4-16.
• Heldman, K. (2018). Project Management Jump Start. John Wiley & Sons.
• Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme. John Wiley & Sons.
• Chin, G. (2011). Agile Project Management: How to Succeed in the Face of Changing Project Requirements. AMACOM.
• Gido, J., & Clements, J. (2018). Successful Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2017). Project Management: A Managerial Approach. Wiley.
• Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.