Assignment 2 Operations Decision Due Week 6 And Worth 548948
Assignment 2 Operations Decisiondue Week 6 And Worth 300 Pointsusing
Using the regression results and the other computations from Assignment 1, determine the market structure in which the low-calorie frozen, microwavable food company operates. Use the Internet to research two (2) of the leading competitors in the low-calorie frozen, microwavable food industry, and take note of their pricing strategies, profitability, and their relationships within the industry (worldwide). Write a six (6) page paper in which you:
Outline a plan that will assess the effectiveness of the market structure for the company’s operations. Note: In Assignment 1, the assumption was that the market structure [or selling environment] was perfectly competitive and that the equilibrium price was to be determined by setting QD equal to QS.
You are now aware of recent changes in the selling environment that suggest an imperfectly competitive market where your firm now has substantial market power in setting its own “optimal” price.
Given that business operations have changed from the market structure specified in the original scenario in Assignment 1, determine two (2) likely factors that might have caused the change. Predict the primary manner in which this change would likely impact business operations in the new market environment.
Analyze the major short run and long cost functions for the low-calorie, frozen microwaveable food company given the cost functions below. Suggest substantive ways in which the low-calorie food company may use this information in order to make decisions in both the short-run and the long-run. TC = 160,000,000 + 100Q + 0.Q2 VC = 100Q + 0.Q2 MC= 100 + 0.Q
Determine the possible circumstances under which the company should discontinue operations. Suggest key actions that management should take in order to confront these circumstances. Provide a rationale for your response. (Hint: Your firm’s price must cover average variable costs in the short run and average total costs in the long run to continue operations.)
Suggest one (1) pricing policy that will enable your low-calorie, frozen microwavable food company to maximize profits. Provide a rationale for your suggestion. (Hints: In Assignment 1, you determined your firm’s market demand equation. Now you need to find the inverse demand equation. Having found that, find the Total Revenue (TR) function for your firm (TR = P x Q). Then, derive the Marginal Revenue (MR) function. Use the profit maximization rule MR = MC to determine your optimal price and output level, and compare these with your previous values.)
Determine whether your price higher is or lower based on the previous calculations.
Outline a plan, based on the information provided, which the company could use to evaluate its financial performance. Consider all key drivers of performance, such as profit or loss in both the short term and long term, and how each factor influences managerial decisions. (Hints: Calculate short-run profit using the generated price and output levels; optionally compare with previous profit calculations from Assignment 1.)
Calculate long-run profit using the output level from part 5 and the cost data, assuming a very competitive selling environment. Explain why this assumption is valid.
Recommend two (2) actions to improve profitability and stakeholder value, and outline a brief plan to implement these actions.
Use at least five (5) credible academic resources in this assignment. Follow proper APA formatting for citations and references. Include a cover page with the assignment title, your name, professor’s name, course title, and date. The cover page and references are not included in the page count.
Paper For Above instruction
The operational landscape of the low-calorie frozen, microwavable food industry has been evolving significantly, impacted by shifts in consumer preferences, technological innovations, and competitive dynamics. Based on the regression results and prior analysis from Assignment 1, this paper assesses the market structure in which a hypothetical firm operates, explores changes in market conditions, and formulates strategic recommendations for sustained profitability.
Market Structure Assessment
Initially, the firm was assumed to operate in a perfectly competitive market, with equilibrium prices determined by the intersection of demand (Q_D) and supply (Q_S). However, recent industry developments suggest a move towards an imperfectly competitive market where the firm possesses significant market power, enabling it to influence pricing decisions. To evaluate this shift, a comprehensive analysis of industry competitors, their pricing strategies, and profitability is essential. Two leading competitors, prepared through online industry reports and financial disclosures, exhibit differentiated pricing strategies—one employing a premium pricing model targeting health-conscious consumers and another engaging in price competition to capture price-sensitive segments.
Factors Causing Market Changes and Impact
Two plausible factors have catalyzed this transition: first, technological advancements in freezing and packaging have allowed better product differentiation, reducing direct price competition; second, increased consumer awareness and demand for low-calorie, health-oriented foods have shifted industry power towards firms capable of branding and market segmentation. This change is likely to impact operations by increasing pricing latitude, shifting focus towards marketing and brand positioning, and emphasizing product innovation over mere cost competition.
Cost Analysis and Decision Strategies
The cost functions, TC = 160,000,000 + 100Q + 0.Q^2, VC= 100Q + 0.Q^2, and MC= 100 + 0.Q, provide insights into the company's operational efficiencies. In the short run, the firm should continue operations as long as the price exceeds average variable costs, which here equals 100Q/Q = 100. In the long run, survival depends on covering total costs, including the fixed cost of 160 million. If the market price declines below the average total cost, discontinuation may be warranted. To avoid losses, management should explore cost reduction strategies, product differentiation, or targeting niche markets.
Pricing Policy and Profit Maximization
Understanding demand elasticity is crucial. Assuming the firm’s demand equation is known, deriving the inverse demand function allows calculation of total revenue (TR = P x Q) and marginal revenue (MR). Setting MR = MC helps identify the profit-maximizing output and price. If prior, the firm was a price taker, now with market power, it can set higher prices. For example, if the inverse demand curve yields a price of $20 at an output of 10,000 units, the firm could increase prices to maximize profits while maintaining sales volume.
Performance Evaluation and Strategic Recommendations
Regular financial monitoring involves analyzing profit margins, revenue streams, and cost structures. In the short term, profit is assessed by subtracting total costs from total revenue at current output levels. Long-term profitability hinges on operating efficiency and market positioning. Recommendations include enhancing branding to sustain pricing power and diversifying product lines to mitigate risks. Implementing dynamic pricing models and investing in marketing are practical steps to boost stakeholder value.
Conclusion
The evolving market landscape necessitates a strategic shift from purely competitive to more market power-enabled operations. By integrating cost analysis, demand estimation, and strategic pricing, firms can adapt effectively, ensuring competitive advantage and profitability in the low-calorie frozen food sector.
References
- Porter, M. E. (2008). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press.
- Varian, H. R. (2014). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach. W. W. Norton & Company.
- McConnell, C. R., Brue, S. L., & Flynn, S. M. (2018). Microeconomics: Principles, Problems, & Policies. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Pratt, J., & Zeckhauser, R. (2014). Public Policy and Economics. Routledge.
- Teece, D. J. (2010). Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 172–194.
- Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2012). Building the Resilient Supply Chain. Kogan Page.
- Oster, S. M. (2015). Modern Competitive Strategy. Routledge.
- Adner, R. (2006). Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98–107.
- Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Harvard Business School Press.
- Kiesling, E., & Kallus, B. (2018). Price Competition in the Market with Cost Uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(2), 723-735.