Assignment 2 Problem Solving Due Week 9 And Worth 150 Points ✓ Solved

Assignment 2 Problem Solvingdue Week 9 And Worth 150 Pointswhen Face

Assignment 2: Problem Solving Due Week 9 and worth 150 points. When faced with a problem, what do you do to solve it? This assignment asks you to apply a six-step problem solving process to a specific problem scenario. You will write a paper that presents a synthesis of your ideas about solving the problem using this systematic approach. As Voltaire said, "No problem can withstand the assault of sustained thinking." Choose one (1) of the problem scenarios as a topic choice for your paper (Note: Your professor must approve your topic choice before you begin work on the assignment.)

Scenario 1: You have worked at your company for eleven (11) years. You have returned to college to earn a Bachelor’s degree in order to increase your chances for a promotion. You are nearly finished with your degree, when a supervisor’s position in a competing company becomes available in another state. The start date is in two (2) weeks, during your final exam period for your courses. The position offers a $15,000 per year salary increase, a car allowance, and relocation expenses. Your former supervisor works for the company and is recommending you for the position based on your outstanding job performance; if you want the job, it’s yours. All of the other supervisors at this level in the company have Master’s degrees, so you know that you would be expected to earn your Bachelor’s degree and continue on to a Master’s degree. Your present company offers tuition reimbursement, but the new company does not.

Scenario 2: Your child comes home from school with an assignment sheet for a school project. He / she is very excited about the project and begins work immediately, doing research on the Internet and gathering materials. You read over the assignment sheet and notice that your child is not including all of the required items in the project, and you have some ideas for how to improve the quality of the presentation. You recently read an article in a parenting magazine about the importance of a child developing responsibility for his/ her own learning. You recall the many ways in which your parents took over your school projects. You, on the other hand, want to encourage your child’s confidence in his / her ability to complete a project independently. The next day, you are at the grocery store when you see a parent of a student in your child’s class. That parent has spent over $30 in supplies for the science project and is taking a day off of work to put the pieces of the project together.

Scenario 3: You have two jobs—one during the week from 9:00 am to 6:00 pm, and one on Saturday from 3:00 pm to 11:00 pm. You are taking two classes—one that meets from 6:00 to 10:00 pm, and one class online. You have two kids—one who plays soccer, and one who is in band. You have two elderly parents who no longer drive. You have two siblings—one who lives two (2) miles away, and one who lives in another state. You have two (2) papers due in your classes the same week that one (1) of your children has a soccer tournament, and the other child has a band concert. You are coaching the soccer team, and you are in charge of fundraising for the band. You have a goal to complete your degree in two (2) years. Your doctor tells you that your blood pressure, your cholesterol, and your weight are too high and recommends several medications that cost you nearly $200 per month after your insurance co-pay.

Scenario 4: You are a sales representative for a company that encourages staff to log time in the field and away from the office. You are expected to begin and end your day at the office. You notice that each day when you arrive and return another co-worker is already there, and you wonder whether this person spends most of his / her time at the office. At your weekly sales meeting, you are informed of your co-workers’ outstanding sales performance. You suspect that this co-worker is spending more time flattering the boss instead of working leads in the field, and as a result is getting the best client referrals. Your own sales numbers have steadily decreased since this other sales representative was hired.

Scenario 5: Professor’s Choice – problem scenario presented by your professor.

Scenario 6: Student’s Choice – Problem scenario presented by you.

Review the six-step problem solving process outlined in the webtext, based on the article “The Problem Solving Process”. The steps are: Step One: Define the problem; Step Two: Analyze the problem; Step Three: Generate options; Step Four: Evaluate options; Step Five: Make your decision; Step Six: Implement and reflect.

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

  1. Define the problem in the scenario that you have chosen.
  2. Analyze the problem in the scenario.
  3. Generate options for solving the problem in the scenario.
  4. Evaluate the options for solving the problem.
  5. Decide on the best option for solving the problem.
  6. Explain how you will implement the decision made and reflect on whether this option was the most effective.

The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing: Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph. Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences. Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA Style format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. Submit the paper draft to Turnitin.com and then submit the originality report with the draft to Blackboar.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Effective problem solving is essential in navigating complex personal and professional scenarios. Applying a systematic six-step process can enhance decision-making and lead to more effective outcomes. This paper examines Scenario 1, where an employee faces a career decision involving a job opportunity in a different state while completing their degree. By defining, analyzing, generating options, evaluating these options, and finally deciding, the individual can approach the problem with clarity and strategic insight.

Defining the Problem

The core issue involves weighing the advantages and disadvantages of accepting a new job offer in another state against the ongoing completion of a college degree. Key considerations include the immediate benefits of the new position, such as salary increase, relocation support, and career advancement potential, versus the lack of tuition reimbursement and support from the current employer. The problem is further complicated by the timing of final exams and graduation requirements, which intersect with the job start date.

Analyzing the Problem

The analysis involves assessing personal goals, career aspirations, financial implications, and educational commitments. The prospective job offers significant benefits that align with long-term career goals, especially given the supervisor’s recommendation and the potential for advancement. Conversely, finishing the degree provides foundational qualifications expected by employers, and the current company’s tuition reimbursement program offers financial support that the new company does not. The timing of exams and graduation further complicates the decision, necessitating a careful evaluation of schedule management and academic responsibilities.

Generating Options

Several options emerge: (1) accept the job offer and delay graduation; (2) negotiate a later start date for the new position; (3) complete the degree before accepting the offer; (4) discuss flexible arrangements with the new employer, such as remote work or delayed relocation; or (5) decline the offer and remain with the current company until graduation.

Evaluating Options

Option 1 (accepting the job offer and delaying graduation) provides immediate career advancement but risks prolonging educational goals. Option 2 (negotiating a later start) could align schedules but may not be feasible given the two-week notice. Option 3 (completing the degree before accepting) ensures educational achievement but delays career growth. Option 4 (flexible arrangements) offers a compromise but requires employer flexibility. Option 5 (staying with current employer) guarantees job security but limits career progression. The best option depends on weighing these trade-offs against personal priorities.

Choosing the Best Option

Considering the benefits and drawbacks, negotiating a delayed start date with the prospective employer appears optimal. This allows completion of the degree, maintaining educational support, and still positions the individual for career growth. Additionally, securing a formal agreement to delay the start can ensure commitments are clear, reducing potential conflicts.

Implementation and Reflection

To implement this decision, the individual should contact the prospective employer promptly to discuss the possibility of a delayed start date, emphasizing the importance of completing educational obligations and how this benefits both parties through maximum preparedness. Reflecting on this choice, it presents a strategic balance between immediate gains and long-term educational and career objectives. While there are risks in negotiating delays, effective communication and clear commitments can mitigate these concerns, making this approach the most effective based on the analysis.

In conclusion, applying the six-step problem solving process enables a structured, thoughtful approach to complex decisions, ensuring that choices align with personal and professional goals while considering all relevant factors.

References

  • Johns, G. (2010). Managing talent development in organizations. Routledge.
  • Kepner, C. H. (1994). The interpersonal skills workbook. Center for Creative Learning.
  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall.
  • Plsek, P. E. (2001). Change the way you change. Harvard Business Review, 79(6), 122-132.
  • Polya, G. (2004). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Basic Books.
  • Simon, H. A. (1977). The new science of management decision. Prentice-Hall.
  • Waxman, S. (2003). Problem solving skills: Techniques to improve your decision making. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(2), 54-61.
  • Webtext on The Problem Solving Process. (n.d.)
  • Voltaire. (n.d.). Quoted in various publications on problem-solving philosophies.