Assignment 2: Problem Solving When Faced With A Probl 918567

Assignment 2 Problem Solvingwhen Faced With A Problem What Do You D

Assignment 2: Problem Solving When faced with a problem, what do you do to solve it? This assignment asks you to apply a six-step to problem solving process to a specific problem scenario. You will write a paper that presents a synthesis of your ideas about solving the problem using this systematic approach. As Voltaire said, "No problem can withstand the assault of sustained thinking." Scenario 1: You have worked at your company for eleven (11) years. You have returned to college to earn a Bachelor’s degree in order to increase your chances for a promotion. You are nearly finished with your degree, when a supervisor’s position in a competing company becomes available in another state. The start date is in two (2) weeks, during your final exam period for your courses. The position offers a $15,000 per year salary increase, a car allowance, and relocation expenses. Your former supervisor works for the company and is recommending you for the position based on your outstanding job performance; if you want the job, it’s yours.

All of the other supervisors at this level in the company have Master’s degrees, so you know that you would be expected to earn your Bachelor’s degree and continue on to a Master’s degree. Your present company offers tuition reimbursement, but the new company does not.

Paper For Above instruction

When faced with a complex problem that involves significant personal and professional implications, a systematic problem-solving approach can be invaluable. The six-step problem-solving process provides a structured framework to evaluate options, weigh consequences, and make informed decisions. Applying this framework to the scenario of potentially accepting a new job offer amid academic commitments requires careful analysis of each step: identifying the problem, gathering information, generating alternatives, weighing evidence, choosing a solution, and implementing the decision.

The first step involves clearly identifying the core problem: Should I accept the new job offer that conflicts with my final exam schedule and my ongoing academic pursuits? This dilemma is compounded by the substantial benefits offered by the new company—salary increase, car allowance, and relocation expenses—versus the fact that my current employer supports my educational advancement through tuition reimbursement, which the new employer does not provide.

Next, gathering relevant information is crucial. I must consider the timeline of the job start date versus my exam schedule and the importance of completing my degree. Understanding the long-term career pathway is essential, especially since most supervisors in the new company possess Master’s degrees, aligning with my future academic plans. Additionally, I need to assess the financial impact—lost tuition reimbursement eligibility could translate into significant out-of-pocket expenses—and the cultural or professional implications of switching companies.

Generating alternatives involves considering various options: possibly negotiating a later start date with the new employer after exams, requesting a deferred start, or seeking temporary flexible arrangements during exams. Alternatively, I might decide to prioritize completing my degree first, thereby strengthening my qualifications before transitioning to a higher position. A third option involves accepting the offer but planning to take unpaid leave or requesting a flexible schedule during exams. Each alternative carries specific advantages and disadvantages that must be carefully weighed.

Weighing the evidence entails analyzing the long-term benefits of each choice. Acceptance of the new position could accelerate career advancement and increase earning potential, but may temporarily delay academic progress and incur additional costs due to the lack of tuition reimbursement. Conversely, prioritizing education offers the benefit of completing my degree without added financial burden or stress, potentially making me more competitive in the future. I must also consider the professional relationships, my personal values, and the opportunity cost associated with each decision.

The next step involves choosing the best solution based on the gathered information. After thorough reflection, I might decide to negotiate with the new employer for a deferred start or a flexible arrangement that allows me to complete my exams. Alternatively, I might choose to honor my academic commitments and turn down the offer, recognizing that completing my degree is a strategic investment that will yield long-term benefits. This decision should align with my career goals, personal circumstances, and values.

Finally, implementing the decision requires action. If I choose to negotiate a later start date, I would contact the employer promptly, explain my situation, and propose a reasonable plan. If I decide to prioritize my studies, I would inform the employer respectfully, thank them for the opportunity, and plan my academic schedule accordingly. This step also involves preparing for potential future opportunities that may arise from each choice, including maintaining professional relationships and ensuring minimal disruption to my career trajectory.

In conclusion, the systematic application of the six-step problem-solving process enables a thoughtful and strategic approach to complex decisions involving career and education. By carefully analyzing the problem, exploring alternatives, weighing evidence, and making a deliberate choice, I can navigate the challenge in a way that aligns with my long-term goals and personal values. The discipline and clarity gained from this process provide a strong foundation for effective decision-making in any professional context.

References

• De Bono, E. (2016). Six Thinking Hats. Penguin Books.
• Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.
• Gardner, H. (2011). Creating Minds: An Anatomy of Creativity Seen Through the Lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. Basic Books.
• Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). The Decision-Making Process. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 13(1), 1-8.
• Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths, and Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence-Based Management. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Shah, S. F. A., & Jansen, B. J. (2017). Decision-Making and Problem-Solving in Digital Media. Journal of Media Psychology, 29(2), 74-84.
• Simon, H. A. (2013). The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd ed.). MIT Press.
• Thompson, L. L. (2015). Making the Team: A Guide for Managers. Pearson.
• Udegbe, B. V. (2015). Decision-making and problem-solving strategies. Journal of the Nigeria Society of Educational Psychologists, 13(1), 28-40.
• Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and Decision-Making. University of Pittsburgh Press.