Assignment 2 Project Schedule Changes You Have Kicked 884491

Assignment 2 Project Schedule Changesyou Have Kicked Off The District

Assignment 2: Project Schedule Changes You have kicked off the District 4 Production Warehouse Move project, your contractors are in place and working on receiving the proper building permits. You originally were told the permits would only take 2 weeks to obtain but the contractors are telling you it will now take 3 weeks. You need to build the additional week into your schedule for each permit that will be obtained. In addition, your framing and drywall contractors have just told you they are running late on their other jobs and can only release half their crew for your project. This will double their schedule.

Build the extra time into your schedule by doubling the installation work timelines for both the framing and drywall. Your project plan should also be updated with the new 3-week timeline for obtaining permits. Use the project plan you created for this task. You are now looking at an extended project delivery date. Your project sponsor was very clear that you must be done in a 4 month timeframe so you will need to look at options for reducing your schedule to fit into the 4 month window.

You have an option of hiring another contractor to help with the framing and drywall work but it will increase your budget by $200,000. Determine your best course of action for bringing this project in on schedule and update your project plan to reflect your recommendation. Develop a 5-6 slide presentation for senior management outlining your proposed solution. You are seeking approval to proceed with your new plan. Submit both your updated project plan in PDF format and your PowerPoint presentation.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Effective project management requires adaptability and strategic decision-making, especially when faced with unforeseen delays or resource constraints. The District 4 Production Warehouse Move project exemplifies the challenges of schedule management and resource allocation. This paper discusses the necessary schedule adjustments due to prolonged permit acquisition, resource shortages, and explores strategies to meet the project’s four-month deadline. Additionally, it proposes a recommended course of action to ensure timely project completion, supported by an updated project plan and a professional presentation for senior management.

Project Background and Initial Schedule

The project team began with an optimistic timeline based on initial estimates—permits expected within two weeks and sufficient crew availability for installation phases. The original schedule allocated adequate time for permitting, framing, and drywall installation, with the total project duration projected at around four months. Critical to this planning was the assumption that contractors could deliver resources on time and at full capacity.

Identified Issues and Their Impact on Schedule

Subsequently, new information emerged. The permits, initially estimated to take two weeks, now require three weeks due to administrative delays. This additional week must be integrated into the project schedule, causing an initial delay. Furthermore, the framing and drywall contractors reported resource shortages—they can only allocate half their usual crews. This reduction effectively doubles their installation time, adding significant delay, potentially pushing the project beyond the original four-month deadline.

Schedule Adjustments and Risk Management

To incorporate these delays, the updated schedule should reflect:

- An additional week for permit procurement, extending the permit acquisition phase to three weeks.

- Doubling the timeline for framing and drywall installation to accommodate reduced crew availability.

These modifications inherently extend the project timeline, risking missing the four-month completion window. To address this, risk mitigation strategies include compressing certain project phases, overlapping activities where feasible, and deploying additional resources.

Option Analysis: Hiring Additional Contractors

The outlined alternative involves engaging another contractor to assist with framing and drywall. Although this would increase the project budget by $200,000, it offers the potential to significantly shorten installation timelines by providing additional manpower and expertise. This approach entails evaluating:

- Cost-benefit analysis: Is the extra cost justifiable against the risk of deadline failure?

- Schedule compression: How much can additional resources reduce the timeline?

- Project quality: Will increasing manpower impact quality control?

Based on current assessments, bringing in extra help appears to be the most viable strategy to meet the tight deadline without compromising project quality.

Proposed Course of Action

The recommended course of action involves:

1. Incorporating the extended permit timeline into the project schedule.

2. Hiring additional subcontractors for framing and drywall to recover lost time.

3. Implementing a fast-track approach by overlapping certain phases, such as initial framing while permits are still being finalized.

4. Securing approval for the increased budget to facilitate hiring additional contractors.

5. Continually monitoring progress and adjusting the schedule as necessary to ensure milestones are met.

This integrated approach balances cost considerations with schedule requirements, aiming to deliver the project within the stipulated four-month window.

Updated Project Plan and Presentation

The project plan will be revised to include:

- New permit acquisition timeline: 3 weeks.

- Expanded installation phase timelines for framing and drywall, reflecting doubled durations.

- Margins for overlapping activities to optimize schedules.

The presentation to senior management will highlight these adjustments, showcase potential schedule recovery, and justify the increased budget. It will emphasize strategic benefits such as risk reduction and timely project completion.

Conclusion

Managing project delays necessitates proactive adjustments and strategic resource deployment. For the District 4 Production Warehouse Move, adapting the schedule to incorporate permit delays and resource shortages was critical. The most effective solution—hiring additional contractors—provides a feasible, although costlier, pathway to meet the four-month deadline. This approach underscores the importance of flexibility in project planning and the need for decisive action to ensure project success within constraints.

References

• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Project Management Institute.
• Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2014). Project Management: A Managerial Approach. Wiley.
• Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2017). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Harrison, F. (2016). Modern Construction Management. John Wiley & Sons.
• Heldman, K. (2018). PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 6. Wiley.
• Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective Project Management. Wiley.
• Zwikael, O., & Smyrk, J. (2019). Project Management for Complex Projects. Springer.
• Fortune, J., & White, D. (2019). anticipating and managing schedule risks. International Journal of Project Management.