Assignment 21 Justification Report Part 1 Due Week 3 500366

Assignment 21 Justification Report Part 1due Week 3 And Worth 150

In Assignments 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3, you will be building up a formal, researched justification report (one part at a time) that culminates in a recommendation to implement a particular product, service, or program in your place of employment. This recommended product, service, or program should resolve a problem that you identify in your workplace and should be directed to your employer (even if you do not actually plan to share it with your employer). Use the basic outline below to draft Assignment 2. Organize your responses to each question under the following section headings:

Problem Statement (for Question 1)

Overview of Alternatives (for Question 2)

Criteria (for Question 3)

Methods (for Question 4)

Using the provided template, write Part 1 of a single-spaced report in which you:

  • Discuss in detail a problem at work, persuading and convincing the reader that it needs fixing.
  • Provide a detailed description of two (2) possible solutions (“alternatives”) that could be implemented to resolve the problem identified in Question 1.
  • List and detail five (5) criteria that you will use to measure the worth of each alternative in Question 2. Note: The alternative that satisfies the most criteria to the highest degree will be the one you recommend later to your employer (in Assignment 2.3). Criteria are standards that the audience values and are therefore used to measure the worth of each alternative (common examples include cost, desirability, durability, efficiency, time it will take to implement, and practicality).
  • Describe in detail how you will conduct the research needed to determine the best alternative to recommend to your employer.

Note: This is a one to two (1-2) paragraph description of what research needs to be completed in order to evaluate the alternatives. This is not a detailed procedure for solving the problem.

Your assignment must:

  • Be typed, single spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides;
  • Citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format.

Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Support ideas or claims in body paragraphs with clear details, examples, and explanations. Organize ideas logically by using transitional words, phrases, and sentences. Use sentence variety and effective word choice in written communication. Apply writing process strategies to develop formal business reports and / or proposals. Use technology and information resources to research issues related to selected topics. Write clearly and concisely using proper writing mechanics.

Paper For Above instruction

In contemporary workplaces, efficiency and problem resolution are critical factors that influence organizational success. Identifying an operational problem and proposing viable solutions through a well-researched justification report can lead to significant improvements. This paper presents a comprehensive approach to developing a justification report's initial part, focusing on defining a workplace problem, exploring potential solutions, and establishing evaluation criteria to determine the most effective intervention.

Problem Statement

The primary issue at my workplace revolves around the persistent inefficiency in internal communication channels, which has led to delays in project completion, misunderstandings, and decreased overall productivity. Specifically, the current communication system relies heavily on multiple fragmented platforms, including emails, instant messaging applications, and paper memos, resulting in information silos and difficulty tracking conversation histories. This disjointed communication process hampers collaboration among team members, especially in fast-paced projects requiring real-time updates and coordination.

Research indicates that poor communication practices directly impact employee morale and operational outcomes. According to Salas et al. (2015), effective communication is essential for team success, and deficiencies can lead to costly errors and duplicated efforts. Consequently, addressing the communication breakdown is imperative to streamline workflows, reduce misunderstandings, and enhance productivity.

Overview of Alternatives

To resolve the identified communication inefficiencies, two plausible alternatives are considered. The first is the implementation of an integrated communication platform such as Microsoft Teams or Slack, which consolidates messaging, video conferencing, file sharing, and task management into a single interface. This solution aims to centralize communication and facilitate collaboration across departments.

The second alternative involves upgrading existing communication infrastructure by investing in comprehensive training for staff on best practices, utilizing current tools more effectively, and establishing standardized communication protocols. This approach emphasizes optimizing current resources rather than deploying new technology, potentially reducing costs while improving communication habits.

Criteria for Evaluation

To assess these alternatives objectively, five key criteria will be employed:

  1. Cost: The total expenses associated with implementation, training, and maintenance.
  2. Practicality: The feasibility of integrating the solution within the current organizational structure.
  3. Efficiency: The extent to which the solution minimizes communication delays and enhances productivity.
  4. Ease of Use: The user-friendliness of the technology or protocols and the learning curve involved.
  5. Time to Implement: The duration required to fully deploy and operationalize the solution.

Methodology

Research to evaluate the best alternative will involve collecting data through surveys and interviews with employees, managers, and IT staff to understand current communication challenges and preferences. Additionally, a cost-benefit analysis will be performed to compare the financial implications of each alternative. Literature review of organizational communication best practices will guide the assessment of the potential effectiveness of each solution.

To gather relevant information, I will conduct interviews with key stakeholders to identify specific pain points and gather insights on existing communication tools' limitations. Surveys will quantify employee satisfaction and usage patterns related to current communication practices. Furthermore, reviewing industry case studies and scholarly articles will inform the expected outcomes and feasibility of each alternative. The gathered data will be analyzed to determine which solution aligns best with organizational goals, resources, and constraints.

Conclusion

The initial phase of a justification report requires a clear articulation of the workplace problem, detailed exploration of potential solutions, and establishment of evaluation criteria. By systematically researching and analyzing these aspects, organizations can select the most appropriate communication enhancement to foster collaboration and improve productivity. The subsequent steps will include detailed implementation strategies and a recommendation based on the thorough evaluation of the formulated alternatives.

References

  • Salas, E., Shuffler, M., Thayer, A. R., Kilsdonk, B., & Kim, S. (2015). Improving Teamwork in Organizations: Advances in Team Training. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 96-117.
  • Duarte, N., & Snyder, N. (2011). Mastering Virtual Teams: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques That Succeed. Jossey-Bass.
  • Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. Routledge.
  • McKinsey & Company. (2020). Building Effective Business Communication. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology/our-insights/building-effective-business-communication
  • Roberts, K. H., & Roberts, E. C. (2017). Communicating in Business. Pearson.
  • Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
  • Tourish, D., & Robson, P. (2006). Sensemaking and the Puzzling Power of Asymmetry: Affective States in Organizational Communication. Organization Studies, 27(3), 351-368.
  • Valacich, J., & Schonghauser, T. (2014). Information Systems Today: Managing in the Digital World. Pearson.
  • Walker, D. H. T., & Northcott, D. (2014). Management Accounting: Concepts, Techniques, and Strategies. Cengage Learning.
  • Zhu, H., & Chen, C. (2018). Enhancing Organizational Communication via Social Media: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Business Communication, 55(2), 152-170.

Related Assignments