Assignment 3: Communication Dilemma—Getting Credit Due ✓ Solved

Assignment 3: Communication Dilemma—Getting Credit Due

In order to complete this assignment, refer to the Case Study titled “Communication Dilemma—Getting Credit” found in Chapter 7 of your Reeves textbook. In addition, use the Internet or Strayer Library to research the gender communication structure in three (3) countries of your choosing.

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

  • Propose three (3) lessons you can learn from gender communication in business.
  • Suggest two (2) ways that gender communication in business can affect a business as a whole. Justify your response.
  • Compare and contrast Robert’s and Claudia’s styles of communication.
  • Speculate on three (3) ways that their communication styles impacted their handling of the situation. Provide support for your response.
  • Imagine if you were in Robert’s shoes. Suggest three (3) ways that you could deal with the situation with Claudia.
  • Next, imagine that you are Claudia. Suggest the main actions that you would take in this situation. Justify your response.
  • Compare and contrast three (3) ways your selected countries’ gender communications are similar or differ.
  • Next, identify one (1) common element from your selected countries’ gender communications; then, suggest two (2) reasons why this element is prevalent in all of your selected countries. If your selected countries’ gender communications do not share any common elements, suggest two (2) reasons as to why this is the case. Justify your response.

Paper For Above Instructions

The intricacies of gender communication in business environments are profound, shaping interactions, leadership, and teamwork. Drawing from the case study of Claudia and Robert, we can discern valuable lessons regarding gender communication that can enhance business success and interpersonal relations. This paper will explore these lessons, suggest implications of gender communication, and analyze the communication styles exhibited by Robert and Claudia.

Lessons from Gender Communication in Business

Firstly, one lesson to be learned is the necessity of recognizing different communication styles based on gender. Research indicates that men often communicate in a more competitive manner, focusing on assertiveness and dominance, whereas women typically emphasize relational and collaborative communication (Tannen, 1990). Understanding these nuances can lead to improved collaboration and synergy in teams.

Secondly, gender communication highlights the importance of emotional intelligence. Effective leaders understand their own emotions and those of their team members, leading to better conflict resolution and decision-making (Goleman, 1995). Claudia’s emotional sensitivity toward Robert indicates the potential for leveraging emotional intelligence to navigate workplace tensions.

Lastly, a balanced representation of gender communication can enhance innovation. Diverse teams that incorporate both masculine and feminine perspectives benefit from a broader spectrum of ideas and solutions (Page, 2007). Organizations should strive for gender inclusivity to take advantage of these benefits.

Impact of Gender Communication on Business

Gender communication significantly affects business operations. One way is through the influence on team dynamics. Poor communication can lead to misunderstandings, low morale, and a decrease in productivity (Schein, 2001). Claudia’s frustrations with Robert’s communication style exemplify this impact, as his actions caused contention rather than collaboration.

Another way gender communication affects business is through leadership styles and employee retention. Gender biases can influence perceptions of competence and the likelihood of advancement in the workplace (Eagly & Carli, 2003). Organizations that acknowledge and address these biases tend to have higher employee satisfaction and retention rates.

Comparison of Communication Styles: Robert and Claudia

Robert and Claudia exhibit distinct communication styles that reflect their experiences and gender dynamics. Robert’s style is characterized by assertion and a desire for dominance, evident in his response to Claudia’s assertion of ownership over the training program. In contrast, Claudia uses a more collaborative approach, attempting to address her grievances directly yet tactfully (Glick et al., 2007). This difference plays a critical role in how they handle workplace challenges, often leading to miscommunications if not addressed.

Impact of Their Styles

The communication styles of Robert and Claudia have significant implications. First, Robert's assertiveness may lead to overlooking Claudia’s contributions, thereby fostering resentment and diminished teamwork. Secondly, Claudia’s diplomatic approach, while effective in maintaining some level of peace, fails to assert her authority, potentially weakening her leadership position. Lastly, their contrasting styles can create a cycle of misunderstanding, further compounding the issue if not adequately resolved.

Alternative Approaches for Robert

If I were in Robert’s position, I would consider three strategies to manage the situation better. One, I would acknowledge Claudia’s contributions publicly, enhancing her visibility and reinforcing teamwork. Two, I would prioritize open communication, establishing an environment where both parties feel heard and valued, which could mitigate future miscommunications. Three, I would integrate regular feedback sessions to ensure alignment and address any potential issues proactively.

Actions for Claudia

As Claudia, my main actions would include directly addressing Robert's behavior by requesting a follow-up meeting to clarify roles and responsibilities in future communications. Additionally, I would document my contributions more thoroughly to ensure recognition. Finally, advocating for a team meeting to discuss communication norms could prevent similar issues and enhance collaboration.

Gender Communication Across Selected Countries

In examining gender communication structures within three chosen countries—Japan, Sweden, and Nigeria—I found both similarities and differences. All three cultures exhibit differences in assertiveness and relational communication; for instance, Japan tends to favor indirect communication, whereas Sweden emphasizes egalitarianism in interactions, and Nigeria displays a mix of both, relying on hierarchical respect in communication (Hofstede, 2001). Moreover, a common element across these countries is the emphasis on respect in communication practices, crucial for fostering positive interactions and relationships.

Two reasons for this commonality include cultural traditions that prioritize respect and the increasing influence of global business practices that highlight the value of positive interpersonal relations.

Conclusion

Understanding gender communication in business is crucial for enhancing teamwork, leadership effectiveness, and organizational success. Robert and Claudia’s case exemplifies the real-world implications of communication styles while demonstrating how to navigate these dynamics effectively. By recognizing and addressing such differences, businesses can leverage diverse communication styles to foster a more inclusive and productive work environment.

References

  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 807-834.
  • Glick, P., Zion, C., & Nelson, J. (2007). A Global Perspective on Gender Differences in Managerial Styles. Journal of Business and Management, 13(1), 121-134.
  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Page, S. E. (2007). The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton University Press.
  • Schein, E. H. (2001). The Corporate Culture Survival Guide. New York: Jossey-Bass.
  • Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Morrow.
  • Wooten, L. P. (2013). Weaving together the strands of gender and communication. Communication Research, 40(2), 190-214.
  • Wood, J. T. (2009). Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender, and Culture. Cengage Learning.
  • Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Science, 330(6004), 686-688.

Related Assignments