Assignment 3 Literature Review Part 1: Introduction And Sele

Assignment 3literature Review Part 1 Introduction And Selection Cri

Your literature review will be submitted in two parts. The purpose of a literature review is to present relevant literature findings from nursing and related fields, show awareness of what is known about this scientific area and apply the findings to nursing practice. The purpose of this assignment is to provide a basis for the remaining class project that builds on this literature review. Only quantitative research studies should be used. Using the skills you developed in critiquing a research article, perform a literature review in a clinical area of interest.

In your classroom, you will find a list of suggested topics, but that list is by no means comprehensive—choose something of particular professional interest to you. Consult your instructor if you have any questions or need help deciding on an appropriate topic. In your final paper, you should provide a clear rationale for an important scientific investigation related to nursing science including at least four relevant peer-reviewed journal articles published within the past five years. Your final paper should be 10 to 15 pages, including the cover page and references.

The following article offers helpful guidelines for constructing a critique of a nursing research article: Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38-43. Note that you will be submitting this assignment in two parts. You will not receive a separate grade for part 1. You will receive your final grade for this assignment when you submit part 2.

Part 1 should be 3 to 5 pages and follow this outline: Introduction: State the topic you selected and why. List a minimum of four keywords that you used for your search and the databases you used to perform your search. Review: List the articles you selected, briefly describing each article and why you chose those articles—for example, relevance to the research topic, methodology used, peer-reviewed content. Summarize the major findings and recommendations of each article.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of conducting a literature review in nursing research necessitates a deliberate and systematic approach to identify, evaluate, and synthesize existing evidence relevant to a specific clinical topic. This project aims to establish a robust foundation for a more comprehensive review, facilitating the identification of key trends, gaps, and implications for practice. For this initial phase, the focus is on selecting pertinent literature, primarily quantitative studies, aligned with a topic of personal professional interest, which also meets methodological criteria.

The selection of a clinical topic should resonate with current nursing challenges or areas where evidence-based improvements can significantly impact patient outcomes or healthcare delivery. For instance, issues such as pain management, patient safety, mental health interventions, or chronic disease management are prevalent fields where rigorous quantitative research could illuminate best practices. To that end, choosing a topic involves considering personal interest, relevance to current nursing challenges, and the availability of recent, high-quality research—specifically peer-reviewed articles published within the last five years.

Keywords play a crucial role in the search process, guiding the retrieval of relevant articles from academic databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. An example of effective keywords might include “nursing intervention AND patient satisfaction,” “chronic disease management AND outcomes,” “mental health nursing AND intervention effectiveness,” or “patient safety AND error reduction.” The combination of keywords ensures a comprehensive search that captures various dimensions of the selected topic, from clinical interventions to healthcare outcomes. Proper documentation of the search strategy is essential for transparency and reproducibility.

Once articles are retrieved, the evaluation process involves assessing each study’s relevance, methodology, and contribution to the field. For this review, only quantitative research will be considered, emphasizing rigorously designed experimental, quasi-experimental, or observational studies. Selected articles should demonstrate methodological soundness, providing reliable and valid data supporting their findings.

Brief descriptions of the chosen articles should include their objectives, study populations, research designs, and key findings. For example, a study exploring the effectiveness of a nursing intervention on patient pain scores might utilize a randomized controlled trial methodology, with results indicating significant improvements with specific strategies. Summaries should also highlight the relevance of each article to the research topic and its implications for nursing practice.

Summarizing the major findings across selected articles reveals common themes, such as the efficacy of certain interventions, barriers to implementation, or patient-centered outcomes. These insights help identify evidence-based practices and indicate areas where further research is needed, informing the subsequent phases of the project.

References

• Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38-43.
• Published peer-reviewed articles relevant to the selected clinical topic, formatted according to APA style.