Assignment 3: Operational Barriers To Success—Deliver 525857

Assignment 3 Operational Barriers To Successdelivering On A Value Pro

Assignment 3: Operational Barriers to Success Delivering on a value proposition demands constant improvement and innovation as competition changes over time along with evolving customers’ needs and wants. How an organization delivers is not only dependent on its ability to serve the market but also on how well it adapts and overcomes the challenges of its own structure, culture, incentives, and design. However, an organization may face many barriers that hinder its ability to overcome these challenges. Using the module readings, Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet, research operational barriers. Based on your research, address the following: What tools might an organization use to help identify barriers?

Identify at least three barriers that impede an organization’s ability to adopt innovative practices and processes. Identify at least one organization that faced these barriers, describe the approach used to address these barriers, and explain whether it was successful or unsuccessful. Explain what you would you have done differently to overcome these barriers. Write a 3–5-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.

Paper For Above instruction

Delivering on a compelling value proposition remains central to organizational success in today’s dynamic business environment. As competition intensifies and customer preferences evolve continuously, organizations must not only innovate but also effectively navigate internal operational barriers that hinder the adoption of new practices and processes. Identifying these barriers involves utilizing various diagnostic tools such as SWOT analysis, process mapping, and stakeholder interviews, which enable organizations to detect bottlenecks, resistance points, and structural limitations that impede innovation (Gopalakrishnan, Kessler, & Scillitoe, 2010). These tools facilitate a comprehensive understanding of internal challenges and foster strategic decision-making aimed at overcoming such obstacles.

Several operational barriers significantly impede an organization's capacity to innovate. First, organizational culture often resists change due to ingrained routines, risk aversion, and discomfort with uncertainty. For instance, companies with a hierarchical culture may discourage experimentation and employee autonomy, thereby stifling innovation. Second, structural inertia, such as rigid hierarchies and bureaucratic procedures, slow down decision-making processes and inhibit agility. A classic example is Kodak, which faced such barriers in its attempt to shift toward digital photography at a time when its existing business model was heavily reliant on film sales (Lucas & Gertner, 2009). Third, inadequate resource allocation, particularly insufficient investment in research and development or technological infrastructure, hampers efforts to implement innovative practices. An organization facing these barriers must develop targeted strategies to foster a supportive culture, streamline decision processes, and optimize resource deployment.

A notable example is Blockbuster, which encountered multiple barriers to innovation, including cultural resistance and structural challenges. Blockbuster's failure to adapt to online streaming and digital distribution was driven by a risk-averse culture and rigid organizational structure that prioritized existing revenue streams over innovation (Christensen, 2013). The company attempted to address these barriers by aligning strategic initiatives with emerging digital trends; however, their efforts were insufficient and too late, leading to bankruptcy. The approach could have been more successful if Blockbuster had adopted a more flexible, innovation-friendly culture earlier and invested adequately in digital transformation. If I were to address these barriers differently, I would advocate for establishing innovation labs within the company, fostering a culture that celebrates risk-taking, and reallocating resources swiftly towards emerging digital platforms, enabling a proactive rather than reactive approach to market changes.

In conclusion, overcoming operational barriers to innovation requires a deliberate and strategic approach. Tools such as SWOT analysis, process mapping, and stakeholder engagement are essential for diagnosing issues early. Organizations must focus on cultivating an adaptable culture, reducing structural inertia, and ensuring resource flexibility. Learning from past failures like Blockbuster highlights the importance of timely, strategic change management processes aligned with innovation goals. By doing so, organizations can sustain competitive advantage, adapt effectively to market transformations, and continually create value for their stakeholders.

References

• Christensen, C. M. (2013). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Gopalakrishnan, S., Kessler, E. H., & Scillitoe, J. L. (2010). Navigating the innovation landscape: Past research, present practice, and future trends. Organization Management Journal, 7(4), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2010.36
• Lucas, H. C., & Gertner, D. (2009). Innovation research and practice: New avenues. California Management Review, 51(2), 8–25.
• Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.
• Teece, D. J. (2010). Business model innovation, technological innovation, and platform stewardship. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 172–194.
• Harreld, J. B., O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2007). Dynamic capabilities at IBM: Driving strategy into action. California Management Review, 49(4), 21–43.
• Schmidt, G., & Braungart, M. (2017). Organizational change and innovation: Strategies for implementing change in organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(4), 603–615.
• Benner, M., & Tushman, M. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.
• Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Ulrich, D., & Barney, J. B. (1984). Perspectives in organizations: Resource dependence, efficiency, and population. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 471–481.