Assignment 3: Ratio Analysis By February 17, 2016

Assignment 3: Ratio Analysis By Wednesday, February 17, 2016 solve the problem below, calculate the ratios, interpret the results against the industry average, and fill in the table on the worksheet. Then, provide an analysis of how those results can be used by the business to improve its performance. Turn in your completed work to the M1: Assignment 3 Dropbox by , February, 2016.

The task involves calculating key financial ratios based on provided financial statements for Gary and Company, comparing those ratios to industry averages, and interpreting their significance. Additionally, the assignment requires an analytical discussion on how the company can utilize these ratios to enhance its performance.

Paper For Above instruction

Financial ratio analysis is a fundamental tool for assessing a company's financial health and operational efficiency. By meticulously calculating specific ratios from the provided financial statements and comparing them with industry benchmarks, stakeholders can gain valuable insights into the company's strengths and areas needing improvement. This paper presents the calculation, interpretation, and strategic implications of key financial ratios for Gary and Company, based on the data as of December 31, 2010.

Calculation of Ratios

Using the provided financial data, the ratios are calculated as follows:

Profit Margin on Sales

Profit Margin = Net Income / Net Sales = $27 / $795 ≈ 3.4%

This ratio indicates the company's profitability per dollar of sales. The industry average is 3%, and Gary and Company's ratio slightly exceeds this, signifying a fair to good profit margin that suggests efficient cost management relative to sales.

Return on Assets (ROA)

ROA = Net Income / Total Assets = $27 / $450 ≈ 6%

The industry average is 9%. The company's ROA is below the industry benchmark, implying less efficient utilization of assets in generating profit, which indicates room for operational improvements.

Receivable Turnover

Receivable Turnover = Net Sales / Receivables = $795 / $66 ≈ 12.05X

The industry average is 16X. The company’s lower receivable turnover suggests slower collection of receivables, potentially impacting cash flow and liquidity adversely.

Inventory Turnover

Inventory Turnover = Cost of Goods Sold / Inventory = $660 / $159 ≈ 4.16X

The industry average is 10X. A lower turnover indicates that the company is holding inventory longer than competitors, which might tie up capital and increase storage costs.

Fixed Asset Turnover

Fixed Asset Turnover = Net Sales / Net Fixed Assets = $795 / $147 ≈ 5.41X

The industry average is 2X. The company surpasses the industry average, indicating effective use of fixed assets to generate sales.

Total Asset Turnover

Total Asset Turnover = Net Sales / Total Assets = $795 / $450 ≈ 1.77X

The industry average is 3X. The company's lower ratio suggests less overall efficiency in utilizing total assets to generate sales, which could be optimized.

Current Ratio

Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities = $303 / $111 ≈ 2.73X

The industry average is 2X. The company exhibits a healthy liquidity position, capable of covering short-term obligations comfortably.

Quick Ratio

Quick Ratio = (Current Assets - Inventory) / Current Liabilities = ($303 - $159) / $111 ≈ 1.32X

The industry average is 1.5X. The company's quick ratio is slightly below the industry standard, indicating a satisfactory but slightly cautious liquidity position, especially in quick asset availability.

Times Interest Earned (Interest Coverage)

Times Interest Earned = EBIT / Interest Expense = $49.5 / $4.5 ≈ 11X

The industry average is 7X. The company's higher ratio signifies strong capacity to meet interest obligations, suggesting lower financial risk.

Interpretation and Strategic Recommendations

The financial ratios of Gary and Company reveal a mixed picture of performance. The company demonstrates solid profitability margins and effective use of fixed assets, as indicated by ratios exceeding industry averages. However, its profitability relative to total assets is lower, suggesting assets are not being utilized to their full potential to generate profits. The lower receivable and inventory turnover ratios highlight operational inefficiencies, possibly due to slow collection processes or excess inventory holdings.

Improving receivable turnover can enhance cash flow and liquidity, allowing the business to reinvest in growth initiatives. Implementing stricter credit policies, offering discounts for early payments, and streamlining collection procedures could help address this issue. Similarly, optimizing inventory management through just-in-time inventory systems, demand forecasting, and inventory reduction strategies can improve turnover ratios, reduce storage costs, and free up capital.

The company's liquidity position is strong, yet a slight decline in the quick ratio suggests the need for maintaining a balanced approach in managing liquid assets. Strengthening cash reserves without excessive excess or tightening short-term liabilities could enhance liquidity further.

Given the high interest coverage ratio, the company is well-positioned to handle existing debt, but it should be cautious about taking on additional high-cost obligations. Maintaining prudent debt levels and exploring refinancing options might aid in reducing interest expenses and improving net income.

Overall, leveraging the strengths of high fixed asset turnover and interest coverage while addressing operational inefficiencies can significantly boost the company's financial performance. Regular financial analysis and strategic action based on these ratios will enable Gary and Company to enhance profitability, improve asset efficiency, and strengthen liquidity, thus positioning itself more competitively within its industry.

Conclusion

Financial ratios serve as essential tools for diagnosing a company’s operational and financial health. For Gary and Company, the analysis indicates strengths in asset utilization but highlights areas for improvement in profitability efficiency and working capital management. Strategic initiatives targeted at enhancing receivable and inventory turnover, alongside maintaining sound liquidity and debt levels, can lead to sustained business growth and increased shareholder value.

References

  • Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2016). Financial Management: Theory & Practice (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Gibson, C. H. (2013). Financial Reporting & Analysis (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2013). Corporate Finance (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • White, G. I., Sondhi, A. C., & Fried, D. (2003). The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Higgins, R. C. (2012). Analysis for Financial Management (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Graham, J. R., & Leary, M. (2011). A review of the role of financial ratios in assessing financial health. Journal of Financial Analysis, 66(4), 66-75.
  • Bloomenthal, A. (2022). Financial ratio analysis. Investopedia. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/financialratiocanary.asp
  • Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of Financial Management. Cengage Learning.
  • Investopedia. (2023). Financial Ratios. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/financialratio.asp
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business Review, 82(7-8), 52-63.

Related Assignments