Assignment: APA Format Is Required For Your Assignment

Assignment: APA Format Is Required For Assignment Be Sure To Provide

Analyze questions related to short-run production, cost theory, economic terminologies, production functions, and regression analysis, ensuring scholarly responses using APA formatting. Address each of the five questions comprehensively with proper economic theory, mathematical derivations, and critical analysis, citing credible sources.

Paper For Above instruction

The current economic landscape often prompts managers and firms to reconsider traditional strategies under changing conditions such as deflation and technological advancements. Particularly, the advice that productivity growth can sustain profits amidst falling prices requires an in-depth examination through the lens of short-run production and cost theory. This analysis, along with a discussion of fixed and quasi-fixed inputs, economic terminologies, and the derivation of production functions, provides a robust understanding of core economic principles relevant to managerial decision-making.

1. Short-Run Production and Cost Theory in the Context of Falling Prices

The assertion in the Business Week article that productivity growth allows companies to boost profits even as prices fall is rooted in the fundamentals of short-run production and cost theory. In the short run, at least one input is fixed—typically capital—while others, such as labor, are variable (Mankiw, 2014). Under deflation, the general price level of goods and services declines, reducing revenue per unit sold. However, if firms can improve productivity—measured as output per labor hour—they can lower costs and maintain or even increase output levels at lower prices (Varian, 2014).

In the short run, the total cost (TC) comprises fixed costs (FC) and variable costs (VC). Since fixed costs are unaffected by output, enhancing productivity reduces variable costs per unit, shifting the average variable cost (AVC) downward (Pindyck & Rubinfeld, 2018). This enables firms to sustain profits despite falling prices, provided that marginal revenue (MR) exceeds marginal cost (MC). Moreover, the law of diminishing marginal returns states that adding more variable inputs like labor initially increases output at an increasing rate but eventually causes the marginal product to decline, which affects the shape of cost curves (Sloman, 2014).

Therefore, the advice from the article aligns with the idea that, during deflationary periods, firms can remain profitable through productivity enhancements, as they can produce more with the same or fewer inputs, lowering MC, and maintaining profit margins (Perloff, 2017). However, this strategy demands continuous innovation and efficiency improvements, as static or declining productivity would erode profits when prices fall.

2. Fixed and Quasi-Fixed Inputs in Oversize Transport Inc.

The leasing of a 275-foot tractor-trailer rig under a five-year lease with monthly payments signifies that, in the short run, this capital is a fixed input: its quantity cannot be altered easily within the lease period, and the firm cannot change the leased asset quickly. The rig's fixed nature stems from contractual and technological constraints, positioning it as a fixed input for the duration of the lease (Varian, 2014). Conversely, the owner-driver's labor is a variable input, as he can choose to work or not within this period, making labor a variable input in the short run.

However, considering the long run—when the firm can decide whether to renew or acquire different equipment—the tractor-trailer becomes a quasi-fixed input. It is "quasi-fixed" because its specific capacity constraints are temporary; with enough time, the firm might invest in additional or alternative equipment, altering capacity (Pindyck & Rubinfeld, 2018). In the context of the leasing contract, if the firm cannot adjust the leased asset before the lease expires, the asset remains fixed; if the firm can alter the lease or buy new equipment, then it becomes quasi-fixed, as some adjustments are possible but constrained by contractual or financial conditions.

3. Explanation of Key Economic Terminologies and Their Contexts

Spreading the overhead involves distributing indirect costs, such as administrative expenses or rent, across different products or departments to accurately reflect their share of total costs (Hansen & Mowen, 2014). This practice ensures better cost control and pricing decisions. A break-even level of production refers to the output quantity where total revenues equal total costs, resulting in zero profit; understanding this threshold is essential for managerial planning (Horngren et al., 2018).

The efficiency of mass production pertains to the ability to produce large quantities of goods with minimal input per unit, leveraging economies of scale and technological advances (Chase, Jacobs, & Aquilano, 2019). It typically results in lower average costs and higher productivity levels. Applying the theory of efficient production to government bureaus or non-profit clubs involves focusing on resource utilization and cost minimization rather than profit maximization. These entities aim to deliver services at the lowest possible cost, maintaining efficiency while fulfilling their social or organizational missions (Mishan & Quah, 2007).

4. Mathematical Analysis of the Production Function

Consider the production function: \(Q = A \times L^a \times K^b\), where \(a > 0\) and \(b > 0\).

(a) The marginal product of labor (MP_L) is derived by differentiating \(Q\) with respect to \(L\):

\(MP_L = \frac{\partial Q}{\partial L} = A \times a \times L^{a-1} \times K^b\).

(b) (Already covered above, based on the differentiation).

(c) The marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS) between labor (L) and capital (K) is:

\(MRTS_{LK} = -\frac{\partial Q / \partial L}{\partial Q / \partial K} = -\frac{a}{b} \times \frac{K}{L}\), which indicates the rate at which capital can be substituted for labor without changing output.

(d) The convexity of isoquants arises because MRTS diminishes as \(L\) increases, which can be shown by analyzing the expression for MRTS. As \(L\) increases, the ratio \(K/L\) decreases if \(K\) remains constant, implying diminishing MRTS—reflecting the principle of diminishing marginal substitutions.

(e) The long-run expansion path shows the firm's optimal input combination as it scales production. It is derived by equating the marginal product ratios to input prices, resulting in a proportional relationship between \(L\) and \(K\):

\(\frac{MP_L}{MP_K} = \frac{w}{r}\), leading to the expansion path \(K = \left(\frac{b}{a}\right) \times \left(\frac{w}{r}\right) \times L\), where \(w\) and \(r\) are input prices.

5. Estimating a Short-Run Production Function: Data Analysis

Given the data on labor usage and output, a scatter diagram should be created to visually assess whether a cubic polynomial fits the data well. If the data points display a pattern where initial increases in labor lead to increasing output, followed by diminishing returns, a cubic model might be appropriate, capturing inflection points.

Using regression analysis in statistical software, you can estimate the coefficients of the cubic function: \(Q = \beta_0 + \beta_1 L + \beta_2 L^2 + \beta_3 L^3 + \epsilon\). The signs of the estimated parameters should align with economic theory: \(\beta_1 > 0\) for initial increasing returns, \(\beta_2

The point at which marginal product begins to fall is identified when the derivative of the fitted function with respect to \(L\) turns negative or when the estimated marginal product estimates decline beyond a certain \(L\) value.

When the firm employs 23 workers, total product (TP), average product (AP), and marginal product (MP) can be calculated based on the estimated regression parameters. If MP is declining at this point, short-run marginal cost (SMC), which is inversely related to MP (\(SMC \approx \frac{w}{MP}\)), is rising, indicating decreasing efficiency (Tucker & McGowan, 2013). This analysis helps managers in optimizing employment levels.

References

• Chase, R. B., Jacobs, F. R., & Aquilano, N. J. (2019). Operations Management for Competitive Advantage. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Hansen, S. W., & Mowen, M. M. (2014). Cost Management: Accounting and Control. Cengage Learning.
• Horngren, C. T., Sundem, G. L., Stratton, W. O., & Burgstahler, D. (2018). Introduction to Management Accounting. Pearson.
• Mankiw, N. G. (2014). Principles of Economics. Cengage Learning.
• Mishan, E. J., & Quah, J. (2007). Cost-Benefit Analysis. Routledge.
• Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2018). Microeconomics. Pearson.
• Perloff, J. M. (2017). Microeconomics. Pearson.
• Sloman, J. (2014). Economics. Pearson Education.
• Varian, H. R. (2014). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach. W.W. Norton & Company.
• Tucker, I. B., & McGowan, J. (2013). Managerial Economics. South-Western College Pub.