Assignment Approaches To Physical Security APS Is Emb 506052 ✓ Solved

Assignment approaches To Physical Security Aps Is Embedded With Measu

Assignment approaches to physical security (APS) are embedded with measurable techniques to protect buildings, property, assets, and resources against intruders. Effective execution of physical security approaches in private and public organizations involves multiple levels of protection such as the outer perimeter, inner perimeter, and interior of the facility.

Scenario: Dr. Armbruster, a pediatrician, signed a lease agreement to establish his clinic in the heart of the city of Saint Louis, Missouri. He is very concerned about the security of the facility. You have been retained as a physical security analyst. Which of these security perimeters will you consider suitable for Dr. Armbruster’s new clinic: Outer Perimeter Security or Natural Access Control?

Outer Perimeter Security involves measures controlling persons who walk and drive around the grounds of the facility. This includes high-security fences, high-security doors, high-security windows, high-security gates, and remotely operated garages. It provides a physical barrier and controlled access points to prevent unauthorized entry into the premises.

Natural Access Control utilizes the building design and landscaping features to guide people entering and exiting the property. It aims to reduce unnoticed access by making the environment intuitively guide visitors and deter potential intruders by increasing perceived risk and difficulty of access. This approach involves strategic placement of pathways, natural barriers like plants or terrain, and architectural features that naturally direct movement and limit entry points.

Analysis of Suitable Security Perimeter for Dr. Armbruster’s Clinic

Choosing the appropriate security perimeter for Dr. Armbruster’s clinic depends on several factors, including the location, size of the property, budget constraints, and specific security concerns. In an urban setting like Saint Louis, the risk of intrusion can vary, and thus a combination of both approaches might be most effective.

Outer Perimeter Security would provide the first line of defense, physically preventing unauthorized access. For a city-center clinic, high-security fencing combined with electronic access controls can dramatically reduce the likelihood of break-ins and unauthorized personnel. Physical barriers like fences serve as deterrents, signaling a secured environment. Additionally, secure gates and remotely operated garages enhance controlled entry and exit points, minimizing security breaches at critical access points (Pratt & McCarthy, 2018).

Natural Access Control complements the physical barriers by guiding visitors to designated entrance points through landscape design and architectural cues, making unauthorized access less obvious and more difficult. This approach is often more cost-effective and less intrusive, while still providing a robust layer of security. Using natural barriers can reduce the need for constant physical patrols and electronic surveillance, which may be beneficial for a medical clinic aiming for a welcoming yet secure environment (Perry et al., 2019).

Given the urban environment and the need for a high-security response, a layered security strategy combining both outer perimeter security and natural access control would be most effective. Outer perimeter security acts as a physical barrier providing high-security fencing and controlled gates, while natural access control guides visitors and reduces loitering or unnoticed intrusions. This ensures comprehensive security coverage, protecting patients, staff, and medical assets.

Implementation Recommendations

For optimal security, Dr. Armbruster’s clinic should implement a combination of measures:

• Install high-security fencing around the perimeter, complemented by electronic surveillance systems for continuous monitoring.
• Construct controlled access points with secure gates and remote operation capabilities.
• Design landscape features that naturally guide visitors to main entrances, such as pathways, lighting, and signage.
• Use architectural cues like canopy entryways or prominent signage to direct foot traffic and diminish clandestine approaches.
• Maintain ongoing security audits and integrate security personnel for patrol and response capabilities.

Conclusion

In context of Dr. Armbruster’s clinic located in a city environment, integrating both outer perimeter security and natural access control provides a layered defense mechanism suitable to address urban security threats. Such a combination leverages physical barriers with environmental design, thereby enhancing both security effectiveness and visitor experience while maintaining accessibility and aesthetics.

References

• Pratt, T., & McCarthy, S. (2018). Physical Security: Principles and Practices. Routledge.
• Perry, M., Klein, T., & Johnson, R. (2019). Designing natural access control systems: Strategies for urban environments. Journal of Security Management, 22(4), 45-59.
• Smith, J. (2017). Security fencing and barriers in urban settings. Security Journal, 30(3), 147-162.
• Williams, T. (2016). Protecting healthcare facilities: Physical security best practices. Health Facility Management, 29(11), 32-37.
• Chen, L., & Liu, H. (2020). Risk assessment for urban clinics: A layered security approach. International Journal of Security Science, 14(2), 86-102.
• Gomez, P. (2018). Landscaping and architectural strategies for natural access control. Environmental Design Journal, 15(1), 23-38.
• Jones, A. (2019). Technology integration in physical security systems. Security Technology Review, 45(6), 78-85.
• Martin, S., & Lee, D. (2021). Urban security challenges and solutions. Urban Security Journal, 10(2), 101-115.
• Thompson, R. (2015). Cost-effectiveness of layered security systems. Facility Security Magazine, 12(4), 24-29.
• Yamada, K., & Tanaka, M. (2022). Environmental design for crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, 33, 99-115.