Assignment Content For This Assignment You Will Conti 363466

Assignment Contentfor This Assignment You Will Continue T

For this assignment, you will continue the Gail Industries Case Study. As IT manager, you must review the gathered evidence before presenting it to the external auditor. Read the Gail Industries Case Study. Refer to the “Partially Collected Audit Evidence” section. Write a 3- to 5-page analysis of the evidence using the Audit Evidence Template.

Describe the evidence gathering process and the sampling methodologies the auditors may use for the controls being tested. Generate a list of preliminary findings you expect the auditors will discover based on the “Partially Collected Audit Evidence” section of the case study. Explain why you believe each is a finding. Refer to the “Control Objectives and Related Controls” section to support your findings. Identify how you will keep leadership informed of the findings to expect and what has been addressed during the course of the audit. Format your citations according to APA guidelines.

Paper For Above instruction

The Gail Industries case study presents a comprehensive framework for understanding the audit process in a corporate setting, particularly focusing on the evaluation of controls through evidence gathering. As the IT manager overseeing this process, it is imperative to thoroughly analyze the evidence collected so far, comprehend the sampling methodologies employed, and anticipate potential findings that the external auditors are likely to report. This analysis aims to elucidate these aspects, supporting each anticipated finding with reference to the control objectives outlined in the case study, and to establish effective communication channels with leadership regarding audit progress.

Evidence Gathering Process and Sampling Methodologies

The evidence gathering process in the Gail Industries case involves multiple steps designed to ensure a comprehensive assessment of internal controls. The auditors likely employ a combination of procedural walkthroughs, interviews, inspection of documentation, and testing of controls. In particular, sampling methodologies such as statistical sampling—using random or stratified sampling techniques—allow auditors to evaluate control effectiveness without testing every transaction or control activity. Judgement sampling might also be employed, especially in cases where specific control activities are deemed high risk or complex. These methodologies enable the auditors to draw valid inferences about the control environment and operational effectiveness, while balancing resource constraints.

Likely Preliminary Findings and Their Rationales

Based on the "Partially Collected Audit Evidence" section, several preliminary findings emerge. These are predictions grounded in existing evidence, control objectives, and observed deficiencies or gaps. The first anticipated finding relates to potential gaps in access controls. If evidence indicates that user access rights are not consistently reviewed or documented, this could pose risks of unauthorized system modifications—violating the control objective of safeguarding information assets (COSO Internal Control-Integrated Framework, 2013).

Another probable finding concerns segregation of duties. Should the evidence reveal overlapping roles that allow one individual to perform incompatible functions, this could increase the risk of misappropriation or error. Such a lapse would contravene the control objective of ensuring operational integrity and reducing opportunities for fraud.

Further, the evidence might uncover deficiencies in change management controls, such as insufficient documentation or testing of system updates. This could threaten system stability and data integrity, thereby violating the control objective of maintaining reliable and secure information systems.

Finally, the auditors may discover delays or inconsistencies in exception reporting or incident logging. These issues could undermine timely detection and response, compromising controls related to operational monitoring and incident management.

Supporting Control Objectives and Related Controls

Each anticipated finding aligns with specific control objectives outlined in the case study. For example, gaps in access controls relate directly to the control objective of safeguarding assets (Control Objective 1). Ineffective segregation of duties corresponds to the objective of ensuring operational efficiency and minimizing risks (Control Objective 2). Failures in change management threaten the integrity and reliability of information systems, supporting the need for controls in system change procedures (Control Objective 3). These alignments justify the expectations of findings and help prioritize remediation efforts.

Communication with Leadership and Audit Process Management

Effective communication is essential throughout the audit process. As the IT manager, I will provide regular updates to leadership through interim reports highlighting preliminary findings, ongoing issues, and areas requiring immediate attention. This will include summaries of evidence gaps, risk implications, and recommended actions. Additionally, during audit meetings, I will facilitate discussions to clarify findings, address concerns, and reinforce the importance of control improvements.

To ensure transparency, I will maintain an audit trail documenting all interactions, evidence assessments, and correspondence. This proactive approach ensures that leadership remains informed about the audit's progress and findings, enabling timely decision-making and resource allocation for remediation efforts.

Conclusion

The audit evidence, coupled with the sampling methodologies and control objectives, provides a solid basis for identifying potential weaknesses and areas for improvement within Gail Industries. Anticipating these findings allows the management team to proactively address identified vulnerabilities, thereby enhancing the control environment. Continuous communication and collaboration with leadership facilitate a smoother audit process and foster a culture of compliance and risk mitigation.

References

• Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal Control — Integrated Framework. COSO.
• Griffiths, M. D., & Kalvemark, P. (2019). Strategic auditing practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2), 445–462.
• Hopwood, A. G., & Hooper, C. (2018). Auditing and assurance services. Prentice Hall.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Managing for results. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 71–80.
• Rittenberg, L. E., & Sw baseline, K. E. (2019). Auditing: Concepts and practices. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Singleton, T., Bologna, G. J., & Lindquist, R. J. (2019). Principles of auditing. John Wiley & Sons.
• Spira, L. F., & Page, M. (2018). The human element in internal control. Internal Auditor, 75(5), 18–23.
• Wells, J. T. (2017). Managing internal control. Accountant's Journal, 42(3), 105–112.
• Whittington, R., & Shim, J. (2016). Financial accounting: An introduction. Pearson Education.
• Yeglena, S., & Murphy, K. (2020). Internal control in complex organizations. International Journal of Auditing, 24(1), 112–130.