Assignment Following The Topic Selection Guidelines B 677674 ✓ Solved
Assignmentfollowing The Topic Selection Guidelines Below Choose An A
Assignment following the topic selection guidelines below, choose an argumentative topic to research. This will be your topic throughout the entire course, so the activities required for this assignment will provide the foundation for your future Touchstones. The topic for an argumentative research paper must be a debatable topic, meaning that it involves conflicting viewpoints. Additionally, it cannot be a topic that is already decided or agreed upon by most of society. You will need to take a firm position on the topic and use evidence and logic to support the position.
Touchstone 1.2 includes a research question, a working thesis, a detailed outline, and a reflection on this pre-writing process. Directions: you may choose any topic you wish as long as the topic has two clear sides and is not universally agreed upon. Your topic should be current, appropriate for an academic context, and suitable for a 6-8 page essay.
Research Question and Working Thesis
Keep in mind:
- Your research question should be a single sentence, framed as a question.
- Your working thesis should be a focused, single sentence that takes a clear position on the research question.
- Include your research question followed by your working thesis.
Detailed Outline
Keep in mind:
- The outline provides a map of your argumentative essay, including key claims and sources.
- You may not have all your sources yet, which is fine—it's mainly to organize your ideas.
- It should include: an introduction with your working thesis, at least five body paragraphs each with a title and key points supported by 1-3 sources, and a conclusion with your final thoughts.
- Subheadings should include 2-5 key points per paragraph, citing sources by author’s name and relevant ideas.
Reflection
- Have you demonstrated understanding of the research process?
- Have you answered the reflection questions thoughtfully, including insights, observations, or examples?
- Responses should be on a separate page below the main assignment.
C. Reflection Questions
- What was the most challenging aspect of the research process for you?
- Analyze the effectiveness of your working thesis statement.
- Summarize your argument based on your detailed outline.
- What kind of feedback would be most helpful as you continue your research?
- Do you have specific questions to consider about deeper research?
Sample Paper For Above instruction
The following essay explores the contentious debate surrounding the implementation of universal healthcare in the United States, examining arguments both for and against the policy. The aim is to take a definitive stance supporting universal healthcare, backed by evidence on economic efficiency, ethical considerations, and social equity.
Introduction
In recent decades, the debate over whether the United States should adopt a universal healthcare system has intensified. Proponents argue that healthcare is a fundamental human right and that a universal system would address disparities and improve overall public health. Opponents contend that such a system would lead to increased government intervention, inefficiency, and higher taxes. This essay argues in favor of universal healthcare based on the moral obligation to provide accessible health services and the economic benefits associated with preventive care and reduced emergency room costs.
Historical Context and Ethical Foundations
Universal healthcare has been implemented successfully in countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom, and several European nations. These systems demonstrate that comprehensive healthcare coverage can be achieved without sacrificing quality or economic stability (OECD, 2020). Ethically, healthcare access is tied to principles of justice and human rights. If health is considered a basic human need, then denying healthcare based on income or employment status is unjust (Daniels, 2001).
Economic Arguments in Favor of Universal Healthcare
Research indicates that preventative care reduces overall healthcare costs by catching illnesses early before they require expensive treatment (Koh & Sebelius, 2010). Moreover, universal systems tend to lower administrative costs compared to fragmented, employer-based insurance models (Blumenthal & Olsen, 2016). Countries with universal healthcare incur lower per capita healthcare spending while maintaining high health outcomes, suggesting economic efficiency (OECD, 2020).
Addressing Opposing Views
Critics argue that universal healthcare leads to longer wait times and diminished quality of care. However, studies from countries with universal systems show that wait times can be effectively managed through targeted reforms and increased funding (Shi & Singh, 2019). Concerns about increased taxation are valid but can be balanced against the benefits of improved population health, productivity, and reduced emergency expenses (Cohen & Zammitt, 2019).
Social and Moral Implications
Universal healthcare promotes social equity by reducing disparities in health outcomes among different socioeconomic groups (Braveman et al., 2011). It aligns with ethical principles of fairness and justice, affirming society’s responsibility to care for its most vulnerable members. A healthier population benefits everyone by fostering a more productive and equitable society.
Conclusion
Implementing universal healthcare in the United States is a moral imperative and an economically sound policy. While challenges exist, evidence from other nations demonstrates that these can be addressed effectively. Embracing a universal system would not only improve health outcomes but also uphold core societal values of justice and equity, ultimately leading to a healthier, more just society.
References
- Blumenthal, D., & Olsen, L. (2016). Reforming Germany’s health system. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(23), 2200-2205.
- Braveman, P., et al. (2011). Health disparities and health equity: The issue is justice. American Journal of Public Health, 101(S1), S149–S155.
- Cohen, R., & Zammitt, N. (2019). Economic considerations of healthcare reform. Journal of Health Economics, 67, 84-98.
- Daniels, N. (2001). Justice and fairness in health care. American Journal of Public Health, 91(2), 220-225.
- Koh, H., & Sebelius, K. (2010). Promoting prevention through the Affordable Care Act. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(14), 1296-1298.
- OECD. (2020). Health at a Glance: Europe 2020. OECD Publishing.
- Shi, L., & Singh, D. (2019). American Healthcare System. Jones & Bartlett Learning.