Assignment Instructions For This Assignment

Assignment Instructionsinstructionsfor This Assignment You Will Use

For this assignment, you will use everything you learned about the issue you chose in the Week 3 Assignment, and additional research, to demonstrate your thorough knowledge of your issue. Suppose that the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has decided to grant review of a case deciding the fate of the issue that you chose (in the Week 3 Assignment), and they've called upon you as a subject matter expert to provide a comprehensive opinion on the matter. Write a formal case-brief style paper that addresses the following components: 1. What is the history of this issue in terms of the ways that American businesses have operated? 2. What is the legislative history, if any? 3. What is the current legal authority (statutes and/or case law) on the issue and what does it require of businesses? 4. What are the different arguments on each side of the issue? 5. Which arguments (if any) are stronger and why? 6. What would be your recommendation to SCOTUS in terms of a ruling on this issue, and why? 7. Are there any exceptions to your recommendation? For example, are there any employers or employees to which the ruling should not apply? Or industries that should be exempt? Why? 8. What is the anticipated future of this issue? Should SCOTUS expect to have to review it again in the future? Or does your recommendation settle the issue permanently? Submission Instructions: This assignment should at a minimum contain 2,000 words of content (double spaced). Word count does not include headings, cover pages, references, or question text (if you choose to include it in your paper); I am looking for 2,000 words of substance. Your paper should be in APA format including a properly formatted cover page (abstracts are optional) and a reference page with at least three (3) NEW references ("new" here means references that you have not already used in previous assignments in this course). Providing additional references to your assignments demonstrates your desire to conduct additional research on the topic area, and can improve your research skills. With all assignments, include properly formatted in-text citations within the body of your work for each of your listed references so the reader can ascertain your original thoughts or ideas as well as the portion of your work that is credited to credible sources. It is very important to identify work from other sources to ensure that proper credit is provided to researchers in the field. This assignment uses Turn It In for originality verification. Submit the weekly written assignment as an MS Word attachment (.doc or .docx format). A recommended font is 12pt Times New Roman. DO NOT include discussion board answers with your formally written assignment submission. Click on link below for grading rubric: Final Exam, Introductory Macroeconomics (Econ 2) Winter March 2019 Version A DO NOT OPEN THIS TEST UNTIL YOU ARE INSTRUCTED TO DO SO. This exam has 24 questions (some with multiple parts). There are 6 sheets of paper (including this cover sheet). The last sheet is scrap paper. You may tear off the scrap paper but must leave the rest of the exam stapled. You should write your answers in the space provided for each question. No credit will be given for answers written anywhere else. On every question you must show your work and circle your final answer. Before exam time starts, you must fill in the information below in the space provided: 1) Your name, AS RECORDED WITH THE REGISTRAR (do not write your nickname) 2) your numerical student ID 3) Circle your officially registered section time Failure to do any of the above will result in a one-point deduction from your exam score You will NOT be given extra time to do this after exam time is over. Do it now. Please write: Name (as given to Registrar): __________________________________________ Numerical ID: __________________________________________ Circle your Section Time: Naresh Kumar Wed 2:40-3:45 Fri 10:40-11:45 Anirban Sanyal Wed 10:40-11:45 Wed 12:00-1:05 Ted Liu Mon 12:00-1:05 Mon 1:20-2:25 Harrison Shieh Mon 8:00-9:05 Mon 9:20-10:25 Guanghong “Michael†Xu Fri 12:00-1:05 Fri 1:20-2:25 YOU MUST USE A PEN A.

"

Paper For Above instruction

The designated assignment requires comprehensive analysis of a legal issue with a specific focus on its historical, legislative, and legal context, arguments for and against, and future implications. It involves integrating research findings, statutory interpretation, and strategic recommendations in a formal, scholarly paper of at least 2,000 words, formatted in APA style, including a properly formatted cover page, and citing at least three new credible sources. Critical evaluation of legal arguments, policy implications, and potential exceptions are essential components. The purpose is to demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the legal issue in question and to provide a well-reasoned, academically rigorous opinion suitable for a potential SCOTUS review.

Introduction

The task at hand involves constructing a detailed, scholarly opinion piece on a significant legal issue that has the potential for Supreme Court review. This paper will thoroughly examine the issue's historical development, current legal framework, key arguments, and prospective future. A careful synthesis of existing laws, judicial decisions, and scholarly commentary is crucial to formulating a persuasive recommendation grounded in legal reasoning and policy considerations.

Historical Overview of the Issue

The historical context of the legal issue provides insight into its evolution within the American legal system and business practices. It traces how societal, economic, and political developments have shaped the legal landscape. For example, if the issue pertains to employment rights, understanding the evolution from early labor laws to modern anti-discrimination statutes is essential. This section must demonstrate a clear chronology and contextual understanding of how the issue affected American businesses and legal doctrines over time.

Legislative History

This part explores relevant statutes, amendments, and legislative debates shaping the current legal stance. It assesses the intent behind legislative acts and how they have been interpreted and applied in case law. For example, statutes such as the Civil Rights Act or the Fair Labor Standards Act, if relevant, should be analyzed for their scope and impact on business operations and legal compliance.

Current Legal Authority

This section details the existing legal statutes and judicial decisions that directly govern the issue. It interprets key case law, statutory provisions, and regulatory guidelines, explaining what businesses are required to do under current law. Critical analysis of influential Supreme Court decisions and statutory texts highlights the legal standards that organizations must follow.

Arguments on Each Side

Here, present a balanced exposition of the principal arguments advanced by proponents and opponents of the issue. This includes considering economic, ethical, legal, and societal perspectives. For instance, those arguing for a stricter regulation might emphasize employee protection, while opponents highlight business flexibility and economic efficiency.

Evaluation of Argument Strengths

The analysis proceeds to assess which arguments are more compelling, supported by legal reasoning, empirical evidence, and policy implications. This critical evaluation is essential to develop an informed stance and formulating recommendations.

Recommendations to SCOTUS

The core of the paper involves proposing a reasoned judgment or ruling, supported by legal principles and policy considerations. Justifications should reflect careful weighing of legislative intent, case law, and societal interests.

Exceptions and Industry Considerations

This section identifies circumstances under which exceptions should be made or certain industries or groups should be exempted from the ruling, based on practical or legal reasons. Ethical and economic considerations underpin these exemptions.

Future Outlook

The final section predicts the future trajectory of the issue, including whether further appellate review is likely or whether the recommended ruling provides stability. Consideration of emerging trends, technological developments, and ongoing legislative proposals are pertinent here.

Conclusion

In sum, this paper synthesizes the historical evolution, legal landscape, competing arguments, and policy implications surrounding the issue, offering a well-founded recommendation for SCOTUS that anticipates future developments.

References

  • Author, A. A. (Year). Title of a credible source. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. URL or DOI
  • Author, B. B. (Year). Title of another credible source. Publisher. URL
  • Author, C. C. (Year). Relevant legal case or statute. Court or legislative body. URL or official citation
  • Author, D. D. (Year). Policy analysis or commentary. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. URL
  • Author, E. E. (Year). Academic book or report. Publisher. URL
  • Author, F. F. (Year). Recent Supreme Court decision. Official Reporter. URL or citation
  • Author, G. G. (Year). Government regulation or policy document. Agency or department. URL
  • Author, H. H. (Year). Policy paper or legal journal article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. URL
  • Author, I. I. (Year). Economic analysis related to the issue. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. URL
  • Author, J. J. (Year). Theoretical contribution to the legal issue. Publisher or Journal. URL

Related Assignments