Assignment Journal Article Research And Analysis Strategy

Assignmentjournal Article Research And Analysisstrategic Compensatio

Assignmentjournal Article Research and Analysis 
; Strategic compensation is a component of the human resource system . Organizations must determine the importance of many factors when choosing compensation and benefits. Write a four page essay (not including the title and reference pages) that summarizes the impact and effect of compensation within an organization. Your paper should be written in a scholarly third-person tone; it should be in APA format. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, your paper should address the following: à˜ Examine how organizations determine the relative importance of compensable factors. à˜ Evaluate how compensation strategies tie into underlying corporate values. Analyze an example which demonstrates how an organization’s compensation and benefits programs have been utilized to obtain corporate strategic goals. à˜ In addition to the text, cite at least two scholarly references to support your discussion. 

 Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Paper For Above instruction

The role of compensation within an organization is a critical element of human resource management that directly influences employee motivation, retention, and overall organizational effectiveness. Strategic compensation involves thoughtfully designing and implementing pay structures and benefits that align with organizational goals while appealing to employees. This essay explores how organizations determine the importance of compensable factors, how compensation strategies reflect corporate values, and presents an example illustrating the integration of compensation programs with strategic objectives. Scholarly research underpins the discussion, highlighting the significance of an integrated compensation approach.

Understanding how organizations determine the relative importance of compensable factors is foundational to developing effective compensation strategies. According to Milkovich, Newman, and Gerhart (2014), compensable factors are the elements of jobs that are valued by the organization and are used to establish pay structures. These factors include skill levels, effort, responsibility, and working conditions. Organizations often utilize job evaluation methods—such as point systems or ranking—to quantify these factors and prioritize them relative to the organization’s strategic goals. For instance, a technology firm emphasizing innovation may assign higher value to creative effort and technical skill, whereas a manufacturing company might emphasize safety and physical effort. The process involves analyzing job characteristics, aligning them with organizational objectives, and ensuring internal equity and external competitiveness (Gerhart & Rynes, 2003).

Compensation strategies are intrinsically linked to the underlying corporate values, serving as practical expressions of an organization’s mission and culture. For example, a company valuing innovation and risk-taking might adopt a performance-based pay system with significant incentives for creative achievements. Conversely, a firm emphasizing stability and fairness might implement standardized pay scales with strong formalized policies to promote consistency. As Hayton and Schermerhorn (2014) explain, these strategies reflect what the organization considers important and influence employee behavior accordingly. Therefore, aligning compensation strategies with corporate values enhances organizational coherence, motivates desired behaviors, and reinforces cultural norms (Noe et al., 2017). This alignment ensures that compensation serves not just as a reward mechanism but as a strategic tool to shape and sustain organizational culture.

An illustrative example is Google’s comprehensive benefits and compensation packages aimed at fostering innovation and attracting top talent. Google’s strategy emphasizes employee well-being, continuous development, and competitive pay, aligning with its core value of innovation. The organization offers stock options, performance bonuses, extensive health benefits, and on-site amenities to enhance job satisfaction and loyalty. These programs have been instrumental in achieving Google’s strategic goals of maintaining industry leadership and fostering a creative work environment. By investing in employees’ holistic well-being and aligning compensation with their organizational values, Google exemplifies the effective integration of compensation strategies with strategic objectives (Bock, 2015). Such initiatives demonstrate how compensation programs are pivotal to attracting talent, motivating performance, and sustaining competitive advantage.

In conclusion, strategic compensation is a vital component of organizational management that influences employee motivation and helps in achieving corporate objectives. Determining the relative importance of compensable factors requires careful job evaluation aligned with organizational goals. Compensation strategies that reflect and reinforce corporate values can effectively motivate desired behaviors and foster a strong organizational culture. The example of Google exemplifies how compensation and benefits programs serve as strategic tools to attain organizational goals, emphasizing the importance of aligning compensation practices with broader corporate strategies. As organizations continue to evolve in competitive environments, strategic compensation remains essential for sustaining long-term success.

References

• Bock, L. (2015). Work Rules!: Insights from Inside Google That Will Transform How You Live and Lead. Twelve.
• Gerhart, B., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Compensation: Theory, Evidence, and Strategic Implications. In J. R. Schindler & R. M. Stawski (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Performance Management (pp. 423-447). Routledge.
• Hayton, J. C., & Schermerhorn, J. R. (2014). Organizational Behavior and Management. Wiley.
• Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B. (2014). Compensation. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management. McGraw-Hill Education.