Assignment Preparation Overview: There Are Three Writ 835132
Assignment Preparationoverviewthere Are Three Written Assignments In T
There are three written assignments in the course, in which you will use the same organization to analyze the culture and make recommendations. It is essential you start to think about your company selection now. Consider selecting a company for which you or a family member works. You might also choose a civic organization. To ensure your selection sets you up for success in all three assignments, be sure that your company: Is one with which you are familiar and is one in which you have access to internal processes. Has a true issue that need to be resolved. Is one for which you can think of possible solutions to the issue that are realistic and enforceable.
For this assignment, write a 1–2 page double-spaced paper in which you will discuss: Your selected organization. The issue you will be analyzing. How the issue hinders organization efficiency. This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards.
For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Confidentiality: Since you will be addressing real issues in real organizations in your assignments, it is important to respect confidentiality. Feel free to use an alias for any company or individuals you might mention in your assignments. Remember that all discussions about these organization should only occur within this course and not be shared with people outside the course.
Paper For Above instruction
For this assignment, I have selected a local manufacturing company called "Innovate Manufacturing" for my analysis. This organization specializes in producing electronic components and has been operational for over a decade. I have access to internal processes through my part-time employment there, allowing me to observe organizational culture and workflows directly. The primary issue I have identified is a high rate of defect errors in the quality control process, which compromises product quality and delays delivery schedules. This issue hampers organizational efficiency by increasing rework, escalating costs, and damaging customer satisfaction.
The defect rate is partly due to inconsistencies in employee training and communication gaps between the production and quality teams. As a result, some workers are unaware of updated procedures or quality standards, leading to errors that could have been prevented. Additionally, the lack of an integrated data management system hampers real-time identification and correction of issues, further exacerbating delays. This inefficiency affects the company's reputation, profitability, and ability to meet client demands, ultimately threatening its competitiveness in a fast-paced industry.
Addressing this issue requires a comprehensive approach that includes revising training protocols, improving communication channels, and implementing a centralized data monitoring system. A structured training program that emphasizes continuous learning and regular updates can mitigate errors caused by knowledge gaps. Enhancing communication between departments through regular meetings and shared digital platforms will foster a collaborative environment and ensure uniformity in procedures. Furthermore, deploying an integrated Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system will facilitate real-time data sharing, quicker identification of defects, and prompt corrective actions. Such interventions are realistic and institutionally enforceable, aligning with the organization's resources and operational constraints.
In conclusion, the defect rate in Innovate Manufacturing's quality control process is a significant barrier to operational efficiency. By focusing on targeted training, improved communication, and technological upgrades, the company can reduce errors, optimize workflows, and enhance overall productivity. Maintaining confidentiality by using an alias ensures sensitive organizational information remains protected while allowing a thorough analysis of the issues and feasible solutions. Addressing these challenges within the framework of organizational culture and process improvement will contribute to sustainable growth and competitive advantage.
References
- Bortolotti, T., Boscari, S., & Danese, P. (2015). Reducing lack of activeness in new product development projects: The role of organizational culture. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 139–152.
- Hossain, M., & Batan, N. (2018). Organizational culture and performance: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of Business Research, 101, 402–413.
- La Morina, D., & Pandey, S. (2020). Impact of communication on organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(3), 45–58.
- Ojo, O. (2017). The importance of training and development for organizational success. Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(4), 78–86.
- Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.
- Robinson, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior (17th ed.). Pearson.
- Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
- Stacey, R. (2012). Strategic Management and Organizational Dynamics. Pearson Education.
- Van Der Vegt, G., & Janssen, O. (2003). A multilevel analysis of the impact of organizational culture on individual and team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 567–583.
- Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.