Assignment Using The DMV Case Study And Stakeholder Analysis

Assignment Using the DMV Case Study and the Stakeholder Analysis Exercise

Assignment Using the DMV Case Study and the Stakeholder Analysis Exercise spreadsheet provided, you are to complete the columns of the spreadsheet for each of the ten stakeholder groups listed on the spreadsheet. First, explain the interest or concern that the stakeholder has in the development of the EA. Then, identify their “class” or role in the EA as one of the four shown above (Key Player, Keep Satisfied, Keep Informed, or Minimal Effort). Finally, explain your reasoning for selecting the class/role that you did. Important: You are not being graded on whether you picked the “correct” stakeholder involvement (i.e. key player, keep satisfied, keep informed or minimal effort). You might see your Security Officer as a key player or as a stakeholder needing to be kept informed. This is fine. What is important is that you provide a solid reason for why you chose this classification as it relates to the interest/concern area. Please only pick one “class” or role per stakeholder . Complete the spreadsheet and submit it via your Assignments Folder by the due date shown in the class schedule. Note: The filename of your submission should include your last name. An example would be: Smith_Stakeholder_Analysis.xls.

Paper For Above instruction

The stakeholder analysis process is crucial in the development of an Enterprise Architecture (EA) for a governmental agency such as the DMV. It ensures that all relevant stakeholders are appropriately engaged, their interests considered, and their influence effectively managed to facilitate smooth project implementation. Using the DMV Case Study and the provided Stakeholder Analysis Exercise spreadsheet, this paper aims to categorize ten stakeholder groups based on their interest or concern regarding the EA development, their level of influence, and the appropriate class or role they should assume in the project.

In evaluating each stakeholder's role, it is essential to understand their specific interest or concern in the EA. For instance, the Security Officer's primary concern could be safeguarding sensitive data and ensuring compliance with security standards. Consequently, they may seek to be kept informed about security-related developments but may not need to be engaged as a key player unless their expertise is critical at certain stages. Alternatively, the IT Department may have a significant interest in integrating the EA with existing systems, thus aligning more towards being a key player, as their input directly influences the architecture's success.

The classification into Key Player, Keep Satisfied, Keep Informed, or Minimal Effort depends on the stakeholder's level of influence and their interest. Key Players are those with high influence and interest who can significantly affect the project's success; they should be actively involved in decision-making. Keep Satisfied stakeholders might have high influence but less interest, requiring them to be engaged enough to prevent opposition but not necessarily involved in day-to-day decisions. Keep Informed stakeholders generally have lesser influence but need to be updated periodically to foster transparency and buy-in. Minimal Effort stakeholders have limited influence and interest and require only occasional communication to ensure they are not overlooked.

An example is the Legal Department, whose interest lies in ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. They might be classified as Keep Satisfied, as their influence is significant due to legal implications, but their day-to-day involvement in EA development could be minimal. Conversely, end-users of DMV services are highly interested because their experience depends directly on the EA, and they could be classified as Keep Informed, receiving regular updates to manage expectations and gather feedback.

Deciding on the classification requires careful analysis of each stakeholder's interests, influence, and the potential impact of their involvement. For example, the IT Security Officer may be classified as Keep Informed if their main role is oversight and guidance on security protocols, but they could be classified as Key Player if they are integral to protecting system integrity during development.

The importance of this stakeholder analysis lies in establishing a well-planned communication and engagement strategy tailored to each group's role. This approach mitigates risks associated with stakeholder resistance, unaddressed concerns, or lack of support. It also ensures that critical stakeholders are sufficiently involved where their influence can make a difference and that others are kept appropriately informed to maintain transparency.

References

• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
• Olander, S., & Landin, A. (2005). Stakeholder influence in construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 23(6), 593-602.
• Bourne, L. (2009). Stakeholder Relationship Management: A Maturity Model for Organisational Implementation. Gower Publishing.
• Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to Do When Stakeholders Matter: Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53.
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
• Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition.
• Peterson, R. (2004). Stakeholder management. Journal of Business Strategy, 25(4), 31-37.
• Varvasovszky, Z., & Brugha, R. (2000). How to do (or not to do) a stakeholder analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 338-345.
• European Commission. (2004). Stakeholder analysis and engagement. DG Environment.
• Grint, K. (2005). Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of leadership. Human Relations, 58(11), 1467-1494.