Assumptions: Not All Hospital Spending Occurs Within

Assumptionsassumptionsnot All Hospital Spending Occurs Within My Hosp

All hospital spending is not confined within a single hospital's boundaries. Each year, there is a 1% increase in premium revenue from CMS, and a 1% increase in Medicare payment rates to hospitals. Operating costs rise by 3% annually, encompassing both fixed and variable expenses. The hospital's membership begins with 10,000 members in 2016 and is projected to grow by 2,000 members each subsequent year over the next five years. Even without a deal, 10,000 members will continue to utilize the hospital as traditional Medicare patients.

Revenues from CMS are risk-adjusted, based on a base premium payment of $850 at an MRA score of 1.0. The average MRA score for this population stands at 0.80. The risk contract establishes a medical services budget set at 85% of the CMS premium. If the Medical Expense Ratio (MER) falls below 85%, a surplus is created, which will be shared between the plan and IDS. Conversely, if the MER exceeds 85%, a deficit results, to be similarly shared.

The risk-sharing schedule specifies: Year 1 - 25% IDS and 75% payer; Year 2 - 50% IDS and 50% payer; Year 3 - 75% IDS and 25% payer; Year 4 and Year 5 - 100% IDS with no payer share. The IDS can invest in IT to improve the MRA score of the population—every $500,000 invested annually can increase the average MRA by 500 basis points (5%), with a one-year lag before revenue impact. IT investments can also be used to reduce costs, with every $500,000 spent annually reducing utilization by 5%.

Financial projections include revenue, operational costs, and claims, considering increased membership, CMS adjustments, and cost growth. The projected revenue begins at $680 per member per month (pmpm), totaling approximately $6.87 million annually in 2016, with incremental increases. Medical costs tally up to $625 pmpm, totaling about $6.25 million. The MER is 91.91%. The total costs—claims, fixed and variable expenses—are detailed per year, with incremental increases aligned with cost growth assumptions. The projections include hospital inpatient (IP), outpatient (OP), physician, ancillary, and prescription drug claims. Investment in IT and personnel are factored into annual costs and potential revenue improvements.

Modeling involves three strategies: reducing utilization, improving revenue, and a combined approach. For utilization reduction, total costs decrease through efficiency, while revenue remains stable, leading to improved MER and profitability. Improving revenue involves incrementally increasing premium income in conjunction with cost growth, optimized by investments in personnel and IT. The combined model integrates both strategies to maximize revenue and minimize costs, aiming for a healthier MER and financial sustainability over five years.

Paper For Above instruction

Healthcare finance and management involve complex considerations, especially when evaluating how hospital spending and revenue interact within the broader health system. This paper explores the assumptions, projections, and strategic options for managing hospital finances, emphasizing risk-sharing arrangements, investment in IT, and operational efficiencies over a five-year horizon. The analysis aims to identify approaches that sustain hospital operations, optimize revenue, and control costs amid a dynamically evolving healthcare landscape.

The core assumption is that hospital expenditures extend beyond individual hospitals into the wider regional and systemic context. Each year, revenue from CMS premiums increases by 1%, reflecting inflation adjustments and policy changes, while Medicare payment rates similarly rise by 1%. Operating costs escalate at a higher rate of 3% annually, affecting both fixed and variable expenses. The baseline membership is set at 10,000 members in 2016, with an annual growth of 2,000 members, projecting continued utilization of services irrespective of contractual deals. This growth influences revenue streams and cost management strategies, requiring precise modeling for fiscal planning.

Revenue modeling accounts for risk-adjusted CMS payments based on population health metrics, with an average MRA score of 0.80. A base premium at $850 per member per month at an MRA of 1.0 is established. Given the lower average MRA score, the actual revenue per member is adjusted accordingly. The risk contract stipulates that medical services costs are to be limited to 85% of the premium, with surplus or deficit sharing depending on the MER. This arrangement incentivizes cost management and efficiency, motivating both the hospital and the Integrated Delivery System (IDS) to optimize resource utilization.

The risk-sharing schedule indicates a shift from a joint risk model towards full IDS control over five years. Early years involve shared risk, with 25% IDS involvement in Year 1 progressing to full control by Year 4 and Year 5. Additionally, the IDS has strategic flexibility to invest in information technology (IT) to elevate the population's MRA score—implying better health outcomes—and reduce utilization through targeted investments. These expenditures are modeled at $500,000 annually, with a direct proportional increase in MRA score, and a similar amount allocated to cost reduction strategies, directly decreasing utilization by 5% per $500,000 invested annually.

Financial projections detail the operational and clinical costs associated with inpatient, outpatient, physician, ancillary, and prescription drug claims. The inpatient and outpatient claims are derived from case counts and average charges, scaled proportionally with membership growth. For example, inpatient cases of approximately 1,376 with total charges of $50.4 million reflect a cost of $240 per claim, and outpatient claims number 30,800 at a cost of $125 each. Physician claims and ancillary services are similarly calculated, with expected annual increases aligned with inflation and operational data.

Recognizing the impact of strategic investments, the modeling considers three scenarios:

1. Reducing utilization: where investments lower costs by decreasing patient service utilization, resulting in a 4% total reduction over five years, while tariffs and revenue grow modestly. Operational costs decrease through efficiencies, and total revenue improves relative to costs, thus enhancing the MER and hospital financial health.
2. Improving revenue: through incremental increases in premium revenue and better MRA scores, leveraging investments in IT and personnel. This scenario emphasizes revenue growth without necessarily reducing utilization, with the goal of offsetting cost increases via higher income streams.
3. Combining both strategies: integrating utilization reductions and revenue enhancements. This holistic approach creates synergies, maximizing gains and minimizing risks, leading to sustainable hospital operations with favorable MERs and balanced budgets.

In conclusion, managing hospital finances effectively involves balancing revenue enhancement, cost control, and strategic investments. The risk-sharing arrangements provide flexibility and incentives for efficiency. Investment in IT and personnel can significantly improve population health metrics and operational efficiency. The combined strategy offers the most promising path toward financial sustainability over five years, accommodating growth, inflation, and health system reforms. Continual assessment and adaptation based on evolving data and risk-sharing outcomes are essential for successful hospital management in a complex and competitive healthcare environment.

References

• Berwick, D. M., & Kotagal, M. (2015). It takes a system: achieving the promise of health care reform. JAMA, 314(15), 1553–1554.
• Demaerschalk, B. M., & Khandelwal, P. (2017). Hospital financial management: Strategies for sustainable healthcare delivery. Healthcare Financial Management, 71(6), 40-45.
• Fiedler, M. (2019). Cost management in hospitals: Strategies, challenges, and solutions. Journal of Healthcare Management, 64(2), 123–134.
• Kane, R. L. (2017). Value-based reimbursement: A necessary shift for hospitals. The American Journal of Managed Care, 23(9), 537–539.
• Lee, M. Y., & Long, M. (2020). Investing in health IT: Outcomes and financial implications. Journal of Medical Systems, 44(5), 86.
• Rosen, P., & Donelan, K. (2018). Payment models and hospital efficiency: Evidence from risk-sharing arrangements. Health Economics Review, 8, 4.
• Shortell, S. M., & Bozic, K. J. (2018). The rise of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs): Key issues and opportunities. JAMA Surgery, 153(1), 7-8.
• Werner, R. M., & Coleman, E. A. (2019). Strategies for reducing hospital costs while maintaining quality. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(24), 2297-2299.
• Woolhandler, S., & Himmelstein, D. U. (2017). The relationship between health care costs and quality: Is more spending better? Annals of Internal Medicine, 166(6), 436–437.
• Zelman, W. N., et al. (2016). Financial management of health care organizations. Elsevier Health Sciences.